| Date |
Text |
| 2007-09-22 09:49:26 | 2007-09-22 09:49:26 |
| | |
| | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SOME ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: COMMENT # 1 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. ONLY SOME OF |
| | THESE CODES COULD BE FOUND ON THE ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | PLEASE ADJUST. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE CODES ON PLANS NEED TO BE CORRECTED |
| | TO THE LATEST CODES ADOPTED BY THE STATE AS OF DECEMBER |
| | 8TH, 2006. |
| | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING. |
| | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS. |
| | 2005 NFPA-70 (NEC) 2002 SHOWN. |
| | 2003 NFPA-101 |
| | 2002 NFPA-72 |
| | |
| | THIS IS REQUIRED AT A MINIMUM ON ARCHITECTURAL AND |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: AS MENTIONED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #2, |
| | PLEASE KNOW THE FIRE ALARM PLANS STILL BEING SUBMITTED |
| | WITH THE BASE BUILD OUT PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED UNDER A |
| | SEPARATE PERMIT. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO |
| | THE MINIMUM LOCATIONS AND LEVELS FOR FBC ADA NEED TO BE |
| | ON THE BASE BUILD OUT PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE MINIMUM LEVELS AND NOT QUOTING THE CODE |
| | SECTIONS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN SHOULD BE ON PLANS. THESE |
| | LOCATIONS AND LEVELS ARE IN FBC 11-4.28.1, .2, AND .3. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 W/2006 REVISIONS AND |
| | CHAPTER 13. |
| | PLEASE SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS FROM FLA-COM ARE STILL |
| | BEING SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE POSSIBLE NOTES FROM |
| | MECHANICAL REVIEWER FOR THIS AND METHODS. AS THIS SPACE |
| | IS APPARENTLY ALREADY CONDITIONED SPACE, THIS |
| | ELECTRICAL REVIEWER ONLY NEEDS THE LIGHTING PERFORMANCE |
| | CALCULATIONS AS SHOWN ON E-2. |
| | PLEASE SEE AS THERE ARE FOUR SETS OF ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED THE LIGHTING DESIGN USE ON |
| | CALCULATIONS DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE LIGHTING |
| | DESIGN USE ON PLANS ON E-2. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE FIXTURE LEGEND FOR ALL FIXTURES ARE |
| | NOT COMPLETE AT THIS TIME. |
| | THERE IS A WATTAGE GIVEN FOR TRACK LIGHTING HOWEVER |
| | FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT INDICATE ANY TRACK. PLEASE |
| | COORDINATE AND COMPLETE. |
| | PLEASE VERIFY HOW ACCENT LIGHTING IS BEING CONTROLLED |
| | PER 13-415.1ABC.1.3. |
| | THE PLANS DO INDICATE A COMBINATION OF SEVERAL TYPES OF |
| | DEVICES, HOWEVER IT IS UNCLEAR HOW THE ACCENT LIGHTING |
| | ETC WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE NORMAL LIGHTING IN AREAS |
| | IS BEING CONTROLLED. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.2 AS THE WATTAGE WHICH IS TO |
| | USED AND FIGURED FOR TRACK LIGHTING (LINE VOLTAGE |
| | @120V)IS TO BE THE FIXTURE WATTAGE @ THE NUMBER OF |
| | FIXTURES OR THE TOTAL LINEAR FT OF TRACK AT 30VA PER FT |
| | WHICH EVER IS GREATER. |
| | AS THE PLANS INDICTED, THE TOTAL LENGTH OF TRACK @ 30VA |
| | PER FT IS GREATER THAN THE FIXTURES AND WATTAGE OF |
| | THOSE FIXTURES THEREFORE THE 30VA PER FT BASED ON TRACK |
| | SHALL BE USED. PLEASE ADJUST THE CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE VALUE FOR COMPLETE SCOPE OF |
| | WORK AS APPLIED WILL NEED TO BE REVISED SUBSTANTIALLY |
| | BASED ON THE COMMENT ABOVE (NOTE #3). |
| | THE PLANS WHICH HAS NOW INCLUDED WORK NOT ON ORIGINAL |
| | PLANS AND APPLICATIONS NEEDS TO BE REVISED. NO |
| | ADJUSTMENT WAS MADE, NO RESPONSE ETC? |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC 108.3 WHICH REQUIRES THE VALUE TO |
| | INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, DESIGN COST, EQUIPMENT |
| | ETC, EVEN IF ANY OR PART IS OWNER SUPPLIED. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS NOTE #9 |
| | MENTIONS THE PANEL SCHEDULES ON PLANS ARE NOT REQUIRED |
| | TO MATCH HOWEVER PLEASE KNOW THIS AHJ DOES REQUIRE THE |
| | PANEL SCHEDULE WHICH ARE ON RECORD SETS OF PLANS TO |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE PLANS FOR ALL SPECIFIC ROOMS AND |
| | AREAS. |
| | THIS IS SOMETHING THAT CAN AND WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED |
| | AND REVISED BEFORE FINAL HOWEVER THE PLANS DO NEED TO |
| | BE SPECIFIC. |
| | THERE ARE NUMEROUS RESEARCH REQUESTS FOR RECORD SET OF |
| | PLANS FOR PANEL SCHEDULES/DIRECTORIES.THE 2005 CODE |
| | BECAME MORE DETAILED ALONG WITH SEVERAL SECTION |
| | MEETINGS WITH THE CODE PANELISTS WHICH THE INTENT OF |
| | THIS IS NOT ONLY THE ON-SITE PANEL DIRECTORY BUT ALSO |
| | RECORD SET(S) OF PLANS. |
| | PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. MAY BE DONE BY ALPHA OR |
| | NUMERIC DESIGNATIONS AND AS MENTIONED ABOVE THIS MAY BE |
| | GONE OVER SO THAT PART OF THIS MAY BE DONE AT FINAL |
| | REVISED PLANS. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.1,106.3.5.1.2, 110.1.2 ETC |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | NEC 408.4, 240.4, 310.16, 220 ETC. |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PANEL SCHEDULES NEED TO BE SPECIFIC TO |
| | ALL ROOMS, AREAS AND CIRCUITING IN WHICH THEY FEED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE NUMERICAL DESIGNATION AS SHOWN ON PLANS |
| | MAY BE USED FOR THE CIRCUITS ON PANEL SCHEDULE OR LABEL |
| | WITH NAME(S). |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING TEXT IS TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM |
| | THE NEC 408.4 AND IS ONLY ONE OF THE SECTIONS AS |
| | MENTIONED. |
| | |
| | *SECTION 408.4 WAS REVISED FOR THE 2005 CODE TO REQUIRE |
| | THAT THE IDENTIFICATION FOR EVERY CIRCUIT SUPPLIED BY A |
| | PANELBOARD OR SWITCHBOARD BE LEGIBLE AND CLEARLY STATE |
| | THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE CIRCUIT IS USED. |
| | CIRCUITS USED FOR THE SAME PURPOSE MUST BE IDENTIFIED |
| | AS TO THEIR LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, SMALL APPLIANCE |
| | BRANCH CIRCUITS CAN SUPPLY OUTLETS IN THE KITCHEN, |
| | DINING ROOM, AND KITCHEN COUNTERTOPS. IDENTIFYING THE |
| | CIRCUITS AS SMALL APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE; INSTEAD, THEY SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AS |
| | ``KITCHEN WALL RECEPTACLES,'' ``DINING ROOM FLOOR |
| | RECEPTACLE,'' OR ``KITCHEN COUNTERTOP RECEPTACLES LEFT |
| | OF SINK.'' CIRCUIT DIRECTORIES CONTAINING MULTIPLE |
| | ENTRIES WITH ONLY ``LIGHTS'' OR ``OUTLETS'' DO NOT |
| | PROVIDE THE SUFFICIENT DETAIL REQUIRED BY THIS |
| | SECTION..* |
| | |
| | (EXAMPLE LV1- (31) OFFICE 128/127 RECEPTS) OR |
| | WORDS/IDENTIFICATION TO THAT AFFECT. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: AS REQUESTED ON NOTE #11 ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE EXPAND ON THE CALCULATIONS. |
| | HOW WAS LOAD DETERMINED ON RECEPTACLES? (MIN NEC |
| | 220.44, 220.14H) |
| | HOW WAS LOAD FIGURED FOR TRACK LIGHTING? (MIN VA PER FT |
| | BASED ON NEC 220.43) |
| | PLEASE EXPLAIN WHERE THE 65% DE-RATING FOR RECEPTACLES |
| | IS IN THE NEC. |
| | SOME OF THIS PREVIOUS NOTE WAS DONE. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE LOAD SUMMARY ON HOW LOADS |
| | WERE DERIVED FOR LIGHTING, TRACK LIGHTING, RECEPTACLES |
| | AND ALL EQUIPMENT. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS AT 125%. PLEASE |
| | INDICATE ANY HEAT LOADS, LARGEST MOTORS ETC. PLEASE SEE |
| | NEC 220, 215.3, 230.42 ETC. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #12 WHICH |
| | REQUESTED FOR INFORMATION REGARDING THE ACCESS/EGRESS |
| | CONTROL DEVICES HOWEVER THE RESPONSE WAS TO SEE THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR THIS INFORMATION. THIS |
| | INFORMATION COULD NOT BE READILY LOCATED AND AS THESE |
| | DEVICES ARE ELECTRICAL IN NATURE THESE ARE TO BE ON |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE ARCHITECT DOES GIVE RESPONSES TO OTHER |
| | TRADES WHEN THE NOTE MAY HAVE BEEN FROM OTHER TRADES |
| | HOWEVER NONE OF HIS RESPONSES GAVE ANY REFERENCE TO |
| | THIS ELECTRICAL NOTE. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION. |
| | **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION FOR ACCESS CONTROL |
| | LOCKS AS NOTED ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE LIFE SAFETY |
| | CODE AND SHOW COMPLIANCE FOR FAIL SAFE OPERATION OF |
| | THESE LOCKS AND DEVICES WHICH SHALL NOT IMPEDE THE |
| | EGRESS UNDER NORMAL OR EMERGENCY CONDITIONS. PLEASE SEE |
| | NFPA-101 7.2.1.5, 7.2.1.6.2 |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH |
| | MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS OR DESIGN. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS |
| | OR COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY |
| | WAY, NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, |
| | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND |
| | THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2007-09-21 16:58:51 | |
| | |
| | |
| | REVIEW TO CONTINUE ON 9/22 |
