| Date |
Text |
| 2008-01-01 15:25:43 | 2008-1-01 15:25:43 |
| | |
| | *** DENIED REVIEW *** |
| | |
| | THIS IS THE THIRD REVIEW FOR PROPOSED BUILDING; HOWEVER |
| | THIS IS ONLY FIRST REVIEW UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | PERMIT WAS APPLIED FOR ON DECEMBER 20TH, 2007. |
| | |
| | ** A CONDITION KNOWN AS A *PROVISO* MAY BE GRANTED FOR |
| | SOME ITEMS BELOW AND ARE NOTED AS SUCH. SOME OF THESE |
| | OTHER ITEMS ARE IN NEED OF ADDRESSING AT THIS TIME. AS |
| | PLANS APPEAR TO BE COMING BACK FOR COMMENTS FROM OTHER |
| | TRADES, PLEASE ADDRESS AT THIS TIME.. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS WITH |
| | RESPECT TO MEANS OF EGRESS PHOTO-METRICS FOR STAIRS. |
| | UPON REVIEW OF THE PLANS COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLANS ANY |
| | MINIMUM LEVELS FOR OUTSIDE STAIRS WHICH ARE AT MANY |
| | LOCATIONS AROUND THE BUILDING.THE LEVELS WHICH WERE |
| | ADDED FOR THE TYPICAL INSIDE STAIRS WERE LOCATED AND |
| | REVIEWED. THE INSIDE WAS OK. |
| | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8 AND 7.9 |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THAT DIVISION SPEC BOOKS WERE |
| | STILL NOT SUBMITTED AND PLANS REFERENCE THESE ITEMS FOR |
| | REQUIREMENTS. UNLESS THESE ARE SUBMITTED, SIGNED, |
| | DATED, SEALED AND FILED AS PART OF THE PROJECT AND FOR |
| | PUBLIC RECORD ANY AND ALL REFERENCES ON PLANS WHICH ARE |
| | SIGNED, DATED, SEALED AND FILED FOR PUBLIC RECORD SHALL |
| | CONTAIN THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION. |
| | ANY REFERENCES MUST BE ON PLANS. EXAMPLE: LIGHTNING |
| | PROTECTION SYSTEM NOTED ON PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE OTHERS. |
| | FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 106.3.1( INFORMATION REQUIRED ON |
| | PLANS) |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MEN AND WOMEN BATHROOMS AS NO |
| | FIXTURES SHOWN CONTAIN NOTES FOR BATTERY BACK UP |
| | FIXTURES AND FIXTURES ON EACH FLOOR SUCH AS L AND L2 DO |
| | NOT CONTAIN NOTES ON FIXTURE LEGEND WHICH STATES THESE |
| | ARE TO BE BATTERY BACK UP. |
| | THIS IS TYPICAL OF THE BATHROOMS ON EACH FLOOR. |
| | ** THIS MAY BE PART OF THE *PROVISO*. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE GENERATOR IS NOW SHOWN FULLY AS |
| | A SEPARATELY DERIVED UNIT; HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE |
| | SUBMITTAL FOR THE FIRE PUMP ATS/CONTROLLER STILL |
| | APPEARS TO BE ONLY A THREE POLE UNIT. |
| | PLEASE CONFIRM THIS AS THE ATS FOR THE EMERGENCY |
| | SERVICE IS OK AT THE 4-POLE AS REQUIRED. |
| | 250.20, ETC. PLEASE CONFIRM AS THE GEN IS SD. NFPA-20 |
| | 9.6, 10.8. |
| | NFPA-110 6.2.15 |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY CONTROL OF FIXTURES F-1 IN |
| | LOBBY 1-115, AS NO NOTE IS DIRECTLY CORRESPONDING TO |
| | THESE FIXTURES THE NEAREST NOTE IS #6. IS THIS |
| | CORRECT? |
| | THIS IS A ITEM WHICH CAN BE RED-LINED AND GIVEN ON |
| | *PROVISO*. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS REFLECT PATTERSON FIRE |
| | PUMP AND SPECS/SUBMITTALS INDICATE AURORA AND |
| | PATTERSON. |
| | WHICH ONE WILL BE PART OF THE PERMITTED PLANS/PACKAGE. |
| | IF PLANS REMAIN WITH THE PATTERSON SPECS THEN ONLY THE |
| | AURORA SPECS NEED TO BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO THE |
| | INPUT DATA REPORT (IDR) AND ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS TO |
| | COORDINATE WITH THE IDR FOR NUMBERS OF FIXTURES, THE |
| | TYPES AND WATTAGES. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING ON THE IDR NEEDS TO BE |
| | ADJUSTED FOR SOME ON PLANS OR IDR. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE SEE THE AMOUNT OF *K*, *K1* AND *K2* FIXTURES |
| | ARE IN QUESTION. THE AMOUNT ON PLANS APPEARS HIGHER |
| | THAN THE IDR. AS THE WATTAGE FOR WHAT IS BEING ASSUMED |
| | AS *K1* ON PLANS AND FIXTURE LEGEND COULD AFFECT THIS |
| | COUNT. PLEASE CLARIFY LOADING DOCK LIGHTS AND HOW THEY |
| | ARE PLANS ON THE IDR. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE SEE THE AMOUNT OF *J* FIXTURES ON PLANS EXCEED |
| | THAT SHOWN IN THE IDR. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY *Z* FIXTURES |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY THE 128 WATT FIXTURE SHOWN ON THE IDR. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY THE FIXTURE LEGEND AND THE POLE DETAIL |
| | ON SHEET E5.01 WHICH INDICATES A TYPE SC FIXTURE |
| | HOWEVER NO FIXTURE COULD BE LOCATED ON THE SITE PLANS |
| | OR 400W FIXTURE WAS LOCATED IN THE IDR. |
| | |
| | ************************ |
| | |
| | ** THE FOLLOWING ARE ITEM IS NOTED IN RESPONSE AND ON |
| | PLANS WHICH WAS NOT REQUESTED BY REVIEWER. |
| | THESE ITEMS STILL NEED TO BE CLARIFIED HOWEVER WILL NOT |
| | PREVENT ISSUANCE OF PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: ** ITEM #1** |
| | PLEASE SEE PLANS STATE AND SHOW THE COMPLETE TABLE PER |
| | 310.16 WAS ADDED TO PLANS AT THE SPECIFIC REQUEST BY |
| | THIS REVIEWER WHEN IN FACT THIS WAS NOT THE CASE. |
| | PLEASE SEE SHEET E5.03. |
| | THIS WAS PREVIOUS NOTES # 10. |
| | THE PANEL SCHEDULES DID NOT SHOW ANY BRANCH CIRCUIT |
| | CONDUCTOR SIZE FOR THE LISTED OVER CURRENT PROTECTION |
| | DEVICES. THE REQUEST WAS TO LIST THE *MINIMUM* ON PANEL |
| | SCHEDULES OR TO SET UP SOME SORT OF TABLE WHICH WOULD |
| | CORRELATE THE SPECIFIC OVER CURRENT PROTECTION DEVICES |
| | WITH THE CONDUCTOR SIZES. FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | 15AMP = #14 |
| | 20AMP = #12 |
| | 30AMP = #10 |
| | 40AMP= #8 |
| | ETC ETC. |
| | VOLTAGE DROP AS REFERENCED FOR FBC 13-413.1.ABC.1.1 AND |
| | .1.2 WAS FOR WORST CASE. |
| | |
| | ** THIS DOES NOT NEED TO BE REMOVED HOWEVER WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE REVISED TO ACCURATELY SHOW ACTUAL |
| | CONDUCTORS INSTALLED FOR STANDARD OVER CURRENT |
| | PROTECTION DEVICE AND THE CONDUCTORS INSTALLED FOR |
| | WORST CASE. |
| | ** IN THE MEETING HELD BEFORE PLANS WERE RE-SUBMITTED |
| | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR ELECTRICAL ASKED IF 310.16 |
| | COULD BE PLACED ON PLANS IN LIEU OF ANY *TABLE*. THE |
| | RESPONSE FROM THIS REVIEW WAS THAT WOULD BE OK, HOWEVER |
| | WAS NOT REQUIRED OR REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE KNOW THE LENGTH AND WORST CASE DESIGN CAN BE |
| | PART OF THE *PROVISO*. |
| | ** PLEASE DO NOT PLACE STATEMENTS ON PLANS FOR ITEMS |
| | NOT REQUESTED BY REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: *** ITEM #2*** |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE RESPONSE MENTIONS 215.3 AND 230.42 DID NOT |
| | APPLY FOR CONTINUOUS LOADS TO BE SHOWN AT 125% AND THE |
| | REVIEWER WAS REQUESTING THIS ABOVE THE *MINIMUM* CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION OR DOCUMENTATION HOW THESE |
| | SECTIONS OF THE CODE DO NOT APPLY TO CONTINUOUS LOADS. |
| | (LOADS OF WHICH ARE 3 OR MORE HOURS, SEE NEC 100 FOR |
| | *CONTINUOUS LOADS* ALONG WITH 210.20A). |
| | IF PLANS DID NOT INDICATE ANY CONTINUOUS LOAD FACTORS |
| | WERE ALREADY FIGURED OR IN DESIGN HOW WOULD THIS OFFICE |
| | KNOW IF ANY CONSIDERATION WAS IN DESIGN? |
| | |
| | THIS WOULD BE THE FIRST TIME AND THE ONLY TIME WHERE |
| | THIS HAS BEEN AN ISSUE. THE FACT IS THAT MOST PLANS |
| | ALREADY HAVE THE CONTINUOUS LOADS SHOWN AT 125% IN |
| | COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ANY DOCUMENTATION WHERE THESE SECTIONS |
| | DO NOT APPLY AND WHAT IS BEING REQUESTED IS ABOVE THE |
| | MINIMUM CODE. |
| | IF THE PLANS/SERVICE/CONDUCTORS AND FEEDERS ETC DO NOT |
| | NEED TO BE SIZED ACCORDING TO THESE SECTIONS AS NOTED |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION ACCORDINGLY. |
| | ** PLEASE DO NOT MAKE STATEMENTS THAT THIS REVIEWER IS |
| | REQUIRING OR REQUESTING ANYTHING ABOVE THE *MINIMUM* |
| | CODE. |
| | IF DOCUMENTATION CAN BE PROVIDED FROM NFPA THAT THESE |
| | SPECIFIC ITEMS DO NOT APPLY THEN THE SERVICE SIZE, |
| | CONDUCTORS, FEEDERS ETC, CAN BE DECREASED. THE RESPONSE |
| | STATES ALL OF THESE ITEMS WERE INCREASED DUE TO THIS |
| | REVIEWER'S COMMENTS AND ARE ABOVE THE MINIMUM. **ONLY |
| | THE MINIMUM IS REQUIRED. THIS OFFICE DOES NOT AND WILL |
| | NOT REQUIRE OR REQUEST ITEMS ABOVE MINIMUM DESIGN. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO ADDRESS COMMENTS. IF THERE ARE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS, ANY COMMENTS NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR OR |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD IN ANYWAY PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN |
| | CONTACTING THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR |
| | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS |
| | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT |
| | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY |
| | DELAYS. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
