| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-17 14:04:02 | BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST: |
| | 1-PROVIDE RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 2- PERMIT VALUATION WAS UPDATED USING THE REVISED |
| | VALUATION SHOWN ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION.OWES |
| | $1026.14 FOR PERMIT VALUATION AND RADON FEES. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) METAL ROOF PANEL.NOA 06-0317.05 SUBMITTED IS |
| | GOOD FOR UP TO -45PSF ONLY.ACCORDING TO SYSTEM |
| | LIMITATION #1 ON PAGE 4 NAIL ENHANCING IS NOT ALLOWED. |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT MEETS THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS. |
| | ***CLARIFY WHY ARCHITECT APPROVED THIS PRODUCT IF IT |
| | DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | B) GARAGE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.NOA03-0430.04 |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR 9'-0" WIDE DOORS. PLANS CALL FOR |
| | 10'-0" WIDE DOORS. |
| | *** CLARIFY WHY ARCHITECT APPROVED THIS PRODUCT IF IT |
| | DOESN'T WORK FOR THE SIZE SPECIFIED ON PLANS. ALSO, |
| | PROVIDE 2 COPIES WITH LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | C) ALL USP STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING |
| | THE CONNECTORS ONLY. NOT NEED TO SUBMIT COMPLETE |
| | REPORT. |
| | |
| | D) EXTERIOR SWING DOORS. CLEARLY IDENTIFY PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR ENTRY DOOR,REAR DOOR AND GARAGE SIDE |
| | DOOR. |
| | ALSO, THERE IS ONLYONE COPY SUBMITTED FOR JELD-WEN |
| | DOOR. |
| | ALSO, CHECKDOOR SIZES SPECIFIED ON PLANS TO MAKE SURE |
| | CORRECT PRODUCT APPROVAL IS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | E) GLASS BLOCK. |
| | |
| | F) PROVIDE ONLY THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT APPLY TO |
| | THIS PROJECT. THERE ARE SOME PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| | FIXED WINDOWS THAT DON'T APPLY TO THIS JOB. |
| | ALSO, REVISE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR COMPONENTS AND |
| | CLADDING SCHEDULE. IT DOESN'T MATCH PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| | NOTE: THIS SCHEDULE IS NOT REQUIRED. REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATIONIS ON SHOWN ON PLANS.THIS SCHEDULE JUST |
| | CONFUSES THE INFORMATION WHEN IT DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. |
| | |
| | 4- GLASS BLOCK PRODUCT APPROVAL TO BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY ARCHITECT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 5- STRUCTURALBUCK DETAILS FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS TO |
| | MATCH INFORMATION GIVEN ON FASTENER SCHEDULE SHOWN ON |
| | SHEET A3. |
| | |
| | 6- REVISE INFORMATION GIVEN ON FASTENER SCHEDULE ON |
| | SHEET A3.NAIL SIZE SPECIFIED FOR WIRE LATH |
| | INSTALLATION ON SOFFIT IS INCORRECT.SEE ASTMC-926 |
| | AND ASTM C1063FOR CORRECT SIZE AND SPACING TO BE |
| | SPECIFIED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | 7- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A) ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE HIS NAME AS REQUIRED BY |
| | CHAPTER 481 FLORIDA STATUTE AND SEC. 61G1-16.004 |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | B) OWNER/AGENT TO SIGN AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORM |
| | ALSO. |
| | |
| | 8- TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT IS |
| | INCORRECT.THERE IS NOT TYPE VI ON FBC 2004. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. SEE SEC. 602.1 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 9- AREA CALCULATIONS FOR NEW PORCH IS INCORRECT. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED.ALSO, REVISE TOTAL AREA AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 10- SHEET A4: |
| | A) SPECIFYCOLUMN TOP CONNECTORS AT CORNER AREAS OF |
| | NEW PORCH. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 11- ROOF SHEATHING NOTE AND INFORMATION GIVEN ON |
| | FASTENER SCHEDULE SHEET A3 DON'T MATCH REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED.ALSO, CLARIFY NOTE REGARDING ZONE 3 (GABLE |
| | END). ROOF ZONE 3 IS NOT ONLY FOR GABLE ENDS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
