| Date |
Text |
| 2008-04-03 12:21:57 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1. WHEN RESUBMITTING, INDICATE THE REVISION AND REMOVE |
| | AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY.A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A |
| | DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET |
| | OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 2. ADVISORY COMMENT REGARDING NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, |
| | FS713.13. |
| | |
| | 3.FBC1802.2.1, 3RD REQUEST; PLEASE PROVIDE THE SOILS |
| | INVESTIGATION REPORT. TWO ORIGINAL SETS ARE REQUIRED |
| | FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE.THE ENGINEER?S RESPONSE LETTER |
| | STATES THAT THIS WAS ADDRESSED BY ADDING A COMMENT TO |
| | THE PLAN IN THE FIRST REVIEW.FOR ALL NEW BUILDINGS, |
| | AND FOR SOME ADDITIONS, SOILS REPORT IS REQUIRED.THIS |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | 4. ADVISORY COMMENT REGARDING THE IMPACT OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION, FBC*109.3.10. |
| | |
| | 5.ADVISORY COMMENT REGARDING HURRICANE PROTECTION |
| | DURING CONSTRUCTION, FBC*109.3.10.1. |
| | |
| | 6. COMMENTS REGARDING SHEET AS0.1: |
| | |
| | 6A-6C, ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 6D. 3RD REQUEST, THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR OPENINGS ARE |
| | ALL LOW; PLEASE SEE FBC TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2). |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, MWFRS AND COMPONENT & CLADDING PRESSURES |
| | DECLARED BY ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER ARE NOT CONSISTENT. |
| | TO WHICH ONE IS THE BUILDING DESIGNED?PLEASE EITHER |
| | MAKE THE TWO SETS OF DESIGN PRESSURES THE SAME OR |
| | ESTABLISH TO WHICH THE BUILDING HAS BEEN DESIGNED AND |
| | REMOVE ONE. |
| | |
| | SHEET AS0.1, SEE THE TABLE PREPARED BY ROBERT H. BURKE, |
| | JR., ARCHITECT TITLED MAXIMUM DESIGN WIND PRESSURES AND |
| | THE TABLE TITLED PRESSURES FOR OPENINGS.THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SPECIFIED ARE TOO LOW FOR THIS WIND ZONE, |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC TABLES 1609.6.2.1(1) AND (2).IF THESE |
| | PRESSURES REMAIN ON THE PLAN, PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR |
| | MWFRS AND COMPONENTS AND CLADDING PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | SHEET S1.0, PREPARED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, |
| | BRADFORD T. BISHOP, ROOF UPLIFT PRESSURE APPEARS LOW |
| | FOR ZONE 1 (PROVIDE CALCULATIONS) AND IS TOO LOW FOR |
| | ZONES 2 AND 3.SEE FBC TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2). |
| | |
| | 6E. (NEW COMMENT)THIS IS A PLAN CHECK ONLY. GOVERNING |
| | CODE FOR A PERMIT SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BASED ON |
| | APPLICATION DATE.PLEASE REVISE GOVERNING CODE TO |
| | INCLUDE 2007 REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS WHICH BECAME |
| | EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2007.THIS COMMENT MAY APPLY TO |
| | OTHER SHEETS; PLEASE CHECK ALL REFERENCES. |
| | |
| | 7. SEE THE PREVIOUS LIST, AS0.4 SECTION 7720/102(1), |
| | COMMENT NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED.THE GOVERNING CODE WAS |
| | CHANGED TO FBC2006, BUT SHOULD BE FBC2004 WITH 2007 |
| | REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS (NO FBC2006 IN EXISTENCE).THE |
| | ENGINEERING STANDARD REFERENCE WAS CHANGED FROM |
| | ASCE7-98 TO ?ASCE7-02 OR LATEST EDITION?.THIS IS NOT |
| | CORRECT AS FBC CHAPTER 35 SPECIFICALLY REFERS TO |
| | ASCE7-02, AND THE LATEST EDITION (ASCE7-05) CANNOT BE |
| | USED AT THIS TIME.PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | ALSO, THIS CHANGE WAS NOT CLOUDED.ALL CHANGES TO THE |
| | PLAN ARE TO BE CLEARLY INDICATED WITH CLOUDS AND |
| | REVISION NUMBERS. |
| | |
| | 8. SHEET S1.0, SEVERAL LOCATIONS, INCLUDE 2007 |
| | REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS IN GOVERNING CODE (PLANS |
| | CURRENTLY DECLARE FBC2004 WITH 2006 REVISIONS).NOTE |
| | THAT GOVERNING CODE IS BASED ON APPLICATION DATE, AND |
| | AS THIS IS A PLAN CHECK, GOVERNING CODE MAY CHANGE. |
| | |
| | 8A-C, ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 8D, SEE COMMENT 6D.THIRD REQUEST. |
| | |
| | 9. FBC1609.1.4, IMPACT PROTECTION REQUIRED.SOME |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED/APPROVED BY |
| | THE ARCHITECT ARE NON IMPACT.USE OF IMPACT PROTECTION |
| | ON COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL, SEE ATTACHED.A HURRICANE |
| | INSTALLATION PLAN PROPOSING USE OF REMOVABLE PANELS MAY |
| | BE SENT PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL VIA EMAIL TO [email protected] |
| | FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW.NOTE ALSO THAT EXIT DOORS MUST |
| | BE IMPACT, SEE FBC1003.6.SOME OF THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS SUBMITTED ARE FOR NON IMPACT GLAZING. PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AND THE ATTACHED INSTALLATION SCHEDULE ARE |
| | REQUIRED FOR SHUTTER PERMITS. |
| | |
| | 10. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED |
| | IN ADDITION TO THE NOAS SUBMITTED, FAC9B72.PLEASE |
| | PRINT THE STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL FROM THE WEBSITE, |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.IF UNAVAILABLE, PLEASE ADVISE |
| | AND IF CODE COMPLIANT, A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE |
| | ISSUED USING THE NOA. |
| | |
| | SEE PREVIOUS LISTS, ITEMS 10A AND 10B.THE FLORIDA |
| | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET MUST BE SUBMITTED |
| | WITH THE NOA, FAC9B72. |
| | |
| | ***ALSO PLEASE NOTE THAT, UPON PERMIT APPLICATION, ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS? EXPIRATION DATE WILL BE REVIEWED. |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE CURRENT AS OF APPLI |
| | |
| | A. STOREFRONT SYSTEM; AS ADVISED, THERE MAY BE ISSUES |
| | WITH THE ANCHORING AS A STRESS INCREASE MAY HAVE BEEN |
| | USED IN CALCULATIONS.THE NOA SUBMITTED IS FOR NON |
| | IMPACT.SEE COMMENT 9; THIS CANNOT BE APPROVED UNTIL A |
| | PLAN REGARDING SHUTTER INSTALLATION IN THE EVENT OF A |
| | HURRICANE WARNING IS ISSUED.PROVIDE FLORIDA STATE OR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | B. PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTED THAT THERE MAY BE ISSUES WITH |
| | THE READY ACCESS DRIVE THROUGH WINDOW.SEE DETAIL 12 |
| | AS8.1 AND SHEET 1 OF9 (DRAWINGS) OF THE READY ACCESS |
| | DRIVE THROUGH WINDOW.THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SHOWS A MAX |
| | FRAME HEIGHT OF 60.5INCHES, THE DETAIL SHOWS A HEIGHT |
| | OF 5FT3IN.GRAPHICALLY THE HEAD DETAIL 1 THE BUCK IS |
| | SHOWN AS VERY SMALL, AND THE DETAIL 13 WHICH SHOULD BE |
| | THE SILL DETAIL IS NOTED AS NOT USED (ALTHOUGH |
| | REFERENCED ONDETAIL 12C).CLARIFY FRAME SIZE. |
| | |
| | C. YKK STOREFRONT DOOR, PREVIOUS LIST REQUESTED THAT |
| | TYPE OF GLASS BE HIGHLIGHTED.THIS WAS NOT DONE.ALSO |
| | SEE ITEM 9, IF THIS IS USED IN A REQUIRED EXIT DOOR |
| | LOCATION, IMPACT REQUIRED.PLEASE NOTE ON THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL WHERE THIS DOOR WILL BE INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | D. INGERSOLL RAND H16-4 OK; PLEASE SEE ITEM 10 AND |
| | PROVIDE FL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | E. SUPREMA MODIFIED, SEE PREVIOUS LIST, NO SYSTEM |
| | SELECTED.THE SYSTEM AND ENHANCED FASTENING |
| | CALCULATIONS REQUIRED (SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #7) CAN |
| | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION. HOWEVER, |
| | SEE DETAIL 4 AS5.2, AS6.2, S2.2, S3.1, THE ROOF |
| | STRUCTURE IS SHOWN AS STEEL.THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR WOOD DECK, BUT WAS REVIEWED/APPROVED |
| | BY THE ARCHITECT.PLEASE ADDRESS OR CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | F. EFIS SYSTEM, NO PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED.SEE |
| | FAC9B72, PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED AND TO BE REVIEWED |
| | BY DOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | G. METAL ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED, BUT FL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL IS ALSO REQUIRED, AND THIS PRODUCT |
| | WILL NOT BE REVIEWED UNTIL ROOF COMPONENT & CLADDING |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES ARE ESTABLISHED.THERE ARE TWO |
| | SYSTEMS, A1 AND A2.IT APPEARS THAT SYSTEM A1 |
| | LIMITATION MIGHT NOT MEET THE PRESSURES FOR ZONE 3. |
| | PRIOR TO ROOF PERMIT ISSUANCE, A SYSTEM IS TO BE |
| | SELECTED. |
| | |
| | 11. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 12. ENGINEER'S RESPONSE IS NOTED; 146MPH IS ACCEPTABLE |
| | AS IT EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM CODE.THE CITY OF WEST PALM |
| | BEACH IS ENTIRELY IN THE 140MPH ZONE. |
| | |
| | 13. SEE PREVIOUS LIST, THERE IS STILL A DISCREPANCY |
| | BETWEEN AS6.3 AND S3.1 DETAIL 1, AND NEITHER IS |
| | COMPLIANT WITH FBC2114.2.THE ENGINEER'S RESPONSE |
| | STATES THAT THERE IS NOT SECONDARY POUR, ARCHITECT?S |
| | DETAIL SHOWS A COLD JOINT.DETAIL 1 S3.1 SHOWS THE |
| | VENEER SITTING ON WHAT LOOKS LIKE CONCRETE BLOCK, WITH |
| | JOINTS WHICH DO NOT HAVE A PHYSICAL BARRIER (TERMITES |
| | CAN GET INTO THE WALL FIRST HORIZONTALLY AT THE BASE OF |
| | THE BLOCK UNDER THE VENEER, THEN UP THE WALL).PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | FOR ALL DETAILS, PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THERE ARE NO OTHER |
| | CONFLICTS BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DETAILS, |
| | OR A AND AS SHEETS.THIS WILL CREATE DELAYS IN THE |
| | FIELD AS IT IS POSSIBLE THAT, IF TWO DETAILS CONFLICT, |
| | A REVISION IN THE FIELD MAY BE REQUIRED AND INSPECTIONS |
| | MAY BE DELAYED UNTIL CONFLICTS ARE RESOLVED THROUGH |
| | PLAN REVIEW.PLEASE ADDRESS ALL INCONSISTENCIES NOW |
| | AND NOTE POSSIBLE CHANGES IN THE NEXT RESPONSE LETTER. |
| | IF DESIGNERS FIND NO INCONSISTENCIES, THIS ITEM DOES |
| | NOT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. THIS COMMENT IS MADE AS |
| | ADVISORY AND AS A COURTESY TO TRY TO ASSIST IN FUTURE |
| | INSPECTIONS. |
| | |
| | 14. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 15. 3RD REQUEST, DETAIL 8 S5.2, ANCHORING OF THE |
| | CORNICE BRACKET NOT SPECIFIED.BRACKET ANCHORS ARE |
| | SHOWN GRAPHICALLY BUT NO INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDING |
| | MATERIAL, DIAMETER, EMBEDMENT, TYPE. |
| | |
| | 16. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 17. PROVISO; AWNINGS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT.DESIGNER |
| | GAVE TWO OPTIONS AS DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 18. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 19. A2.0 WALL TYPE LEGEND WAS REVISED, WALL TYPE 1 |
| | PREVIOUSLY STATED EXISTING WALL, NOW STATES NEW WALL, |
| | BUT THE WALL TYPE KEY WAS NOT REVISED.THE |
| | GRAPHIC/LEGEND STILL SHOWS AN EXISTING WALL ON THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION PLAN. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | |
| | 21. AS0.1 STATES (UNDER FBC TABLE 403.1 REQUIRED |
| | PLUMBING FIXTURES) THAT THIS IS A SHELL PERMIT ONLY AT |
| | THIS TIME.PLEASE REMOVE. |
| | |
| | 22.(ADVISORY) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, |
| | IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY, |
| | 561-233-5025.THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED AND THE |
| | RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION.IF THIS HAS |
| | ALREADY BEEN DONE, PLEASE PROVIDE THE STAMPED FLOOR |
| | PLAN OR SITE PLAN AND A COPY OF THE RECEIPT. |
| | |
| | 23. (ADVISORY) AS FIRE SPRINKLERS ARE REQUIRED BY THE |
| | WESTWARD SHOPPING PLAZA, FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS MUST |
| | REMAIN IN THE PACKAGE.NOTE THAT THE DESIGNER HAS |
| | DECLARED A FULLY SPRINKLERED BUILDING, BUT THIS EXCEEDS |
| | MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS.NO ACTION NEEDED; ADVISORY |
| | ONLY. |
| | |
| | 24.SEE ELECTRIC REVIEW COMMENT REGARDING TWO SETS OF |
| | PLANS INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT APPLICATION.SUBMITTAL |
| | OF TWO SETS OF ELEVATIONS, TWO SETS OF LIFE SAFETY, |
| | ETC. CAUSES SOME CONFUSION.PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENT |
| | REGARDING INCONSISTENCIES WITHIN THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 25.PLEASE NOTE THAT A BUILDING REVIEW IS REQUIRED |
| | EACH TIME NEW ENERGY CALCS ARE SUBMITTED.PLEASE |
| | CONFIRM THAT ALL BUILDING COMPONENTS ON THE ENERGY CALC |
| | INPUT DATA REPORT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS (DOORS, |
| | WINDOWS, INSULATION, HOT WATER HEATER, FLOOR AREA, |
| | ETC.).(ADDED 4/8; INFORMED ARCHITECT.) |
