| Date |
Text |
| 2007-04-20 15:54:45 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | |
| | REGARDING THE LETTER PREPARED BY JOHN HOLT, PE, NOTE |
| | THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | 1.THE ENGINEERING DOES NOT REFER TO THE NOA.PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, |
| | FBC*106.3.3. |
| | |
| | 2.THE ENGINEER STATES THAT THE CORNER IS 4" EACH |
| | DIRECTION.PLEASE REVISE, SEE FBC R 301. |
| | |
| | 3.THE ENGINEER STATES THAT THE LAP NAILING IS 3", 4" |
| | IS THE MINIMUM SPACING, RAS117. |
| | |
| | 4.THE ENGINEER STATES THAT THE CORNERIS TO HAVE 5 |
| | 1/2INCH SPACING.RAS117 REQUIRES THAT NAILING BE |
| | ROUNDED DOWN TO THE NEXT WHOLE NUMBER. |
| | |
| | 5.THE ENGINEER STATES THAT HE IS USING 140 EXPOSURE C |
| | PRESSURES.ASCE7-02 OR FBC TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2)? |
| | ENGINEER DOES NOT SPECIFY DESIGN PRESSURES, SO I CANNOT |
| | DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT ENHANCED FASTENING FOR ZONE 2, |
| | PERIMETER, IS REQUIRED.ENGINEER SPECIFIES ONLY THE |
| | FIELD AND CORNER, ZONES 1 AND 3. |
| | |
| | 6.THE FIELD FASTENING SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IS |
| | NOT COMPLIANT FOR THE ASSEMBLY THE CONTRACTOR HAS |
| | SELECTED.AS THE ENGINEER DOES NOT REFERENCE ANY NOA |
| | OR ASSEMBLY, DOES HE INTEND THAT THIS FASTENING IS FOR |
| | ANY ROOF SYSTEM?MOST HAVE FASTENING CLOSER THAN |
| | 10INCHES. |
| | |
| | 7.SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #7.PROVIDE CALCULATIONS IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH RAS117. |
| | |
| | A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED. |
| | |
