| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-09 14:02:58 | DENIED 2ND TIME |
| | REFERENCE: |
| | ** FBC-2004 PLUMBING. |
| | ** FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, THE CITY OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS. |
| | ** FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | ** FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL |
| | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH SOME NEW COMMENTS, |
| | SOME BASED ON PLANS NOW SUBMITTED, NEW DOCUMENTS BEING |
| | REVIEWED FOR THE FIRST TIME AND SOME NEW COMMENTS NOT |
| | MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A NO, OK OR A NO/OK. |
| | THESE WILL BE FOR THE EXACT NUMERICAL NOTATION OF THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES. |
| | |
| | A **NO** IS IF THE COMMENT WAS NOT FULLY ADDRESSED |
| | AND/OR FURTHER EXPLANATION OR CHANGES IN PLANS OR |
| | DOCUMENTS ARE STILL NEEDED. THIS REVIEWER WILL TRY TO |
| | BETTER EXPLAIN NOTE ABOVE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT. |
| | |
| | AN **OK** WILL BE LABELED AS SUCH ON THE SAME NUMERICAL |
| | COMMENT AND WILL HAVE OLD NOTE REMOVED FROM COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | A **NO/OK** MEANS PART OF THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE ANY NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END OF |
| | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AND NOTED AS SUCH. |
| | |
| | 1. **OK** |
| | |
| | 2. **OK** |
| | |
| | 3. **OK** |
| | |
| | 4. **NO**PER FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, SECTION 106.3.5.4 |
| | RESIDENTIAL (ONE AND TWO-FAMILY) PLEASE SUBMIT A |
| | PLUMBING SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM INDICATING |
| | ALL WASTE, VENTS, TRAPS AND SIZES WITH CLEANOUT |
| | LOCATIONS. |
| | NOTE: THE RESUBMITTED DRAWINGS STILL DO NOT HAVE A |
| | SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM REQUIRED FOR PLUMBING |
| | PLAN REVIEW. AGAIN PLEASE REFERENCE AN EXAMPLE OF THE |
| | PROPOSED BATHROOM SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM |
| | ATTACHED TO THE DENIED PLUMBING COMMENTS FOR THE |
| | RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 5. **OK** |
| | |
| | 6. **OK** |
| | |
| | 7. **NO/OK** FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1,SECTION 106.3.4.2: THE |
| | PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF |
| | THE DRAWING SHALL CLEARLY PRINT AND SIGN |
| | NAME, AND ALSO DATE DRAWING. PLEASE DO |
| | THIS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING. |
| | NOTE: NOT ALL RESUBMITTED DRAWINGS HAD THE PRINTED AND |
| | SIGNED NAMES OF THE PERSON RESPOSIBLE FOR THE DRAWINGS. |
| | TWO COMPLETE SETS OF SIGNED DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | **THE FOLLOWING ARE NEW COMMENTS.** |
| | NOTE: THE RESUBMITTED INFORMATION IS INDICATING THAT |
| | THIS IS A NEW BATHROOM THAT WAS AN OLD STORAGE CLOSET. |
| | THIS PROJECT SHOULD HAVE BEENSUBMITTED AS A |
| | RESIDENTIAL RENOVATION WITH PLAN REVIEWS FROM |
| | ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, BUILDING AS WELL AS THIS |
| | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 8. PER FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, SECTION 106: CONSTRUCTION |
| | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN PENCIL ARE UNACCEPTABLE, PLEASE |
| | RESUBMIT ANY FUTURE DRAWINGS IN INK. |
| | |
| | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** |
| | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, |
| | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS |
| | WHICH HAVE CHANGED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY |
| | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE |
| | ONLY. |
| | NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING |
| | IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR |
| | RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | END OF COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON |
| | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6730 |
| | FAX (561) 805-6731 |
| | E-MAIL [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
