| Date |
Text |
| 2008-05-14 15:40:13 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. NOTE CORRECTION SUBMITTAL |
| | WHEN RE-SUBMITTING CORRECTED PLANS FOR PERMITTING, |
| | PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY SHEETS AS NECESSARY. |
| | INCLUDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE. IDENTIFY THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE |
| | WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND AND INCLUDE THE OLD |
| | SHEETS IN THE RE-SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR THE PLAN |
| | REVIEWER'S REFERENCE. |
| | THIS SHALL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU |
| | FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2. F.S. 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT |
| | FILE NOTICE WITH THE CLERK OF COURT RECORDING |
| | DIVISION. |
| | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE IS NOT COMMENCED |
| | |
| | WITHIN 90 DAYS OF FILING THE NOTICE WILL BECOME NULL |
| | |
| | AND VOID. SUBMIT THE NOTICE AT THE TIME OF PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE AND POST A COPY AT THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE |
| | FIRST INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | 3. NOTES SHEET 2.1 |
| | |
| | (A) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | (B) PROJECT INFORMATION - PLEASE COMPLETE ON PLAN |
| | INFORMATION |
| | CONSTRUCTION TYPE |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, TYPE DECLARED IS TYPE II, BUT DETAILS SHOW |
| | WOOD TRUSSES.NO INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDING THE |
| | EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING, SEE FBC503.1.3. |
| | |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, SEE FBC 1004, OCCUPANT LOAD CANNOT BE LESS |
| | THAN FBC TABLE 1004.2.1. |
| | |
| | OTHER INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED AND PROVIDED, BUT DUE |
| | TO INCORRECT/INCOMPLETE INFORMATION, CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | CANNOT BE DETERMINED.COMPLETE INFORMATION REGARDING |
| | THE TWO BUILDINGS MUST BE PROVIDED AS WELL AS |
| | INFORMATION REGARDING HOW YOU ARE COMPLYING WITH FBC |
| | TABLE 601, FBC TABLE 602, FBC TABLE 503, FBC TABLE |
| | 704.8.WITHOUT ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED, CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE DETERMINED.NO INFORMATION |
| | REGARDING HOW THIS PROJECT COMPLIES WAS PROVIDED.SEE |
| | FIRST COMMENT LIST, ALL CALCULATIONS REGARDING ANY AREA |
| | INCREASES ARE TO BE ON THE PLAN.NO AREA INCREASES |
| | WERE TAKEN BUT THE WRONG BUILDING TYPE DECLARED.NOT |
| | ENOUGH INFORMATION PROVIDED TO DETERMINE CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | FBC 501.2 PREMISES IDENTIFICATION. |
| | 3RD REVIEW, PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS WAS ADDRESSED AS |
| | REQUESTED.HOWEVER, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH MUNICIPAL |
| | CODE 78-6(1) AND ALSO NFPA 101/FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION |
| | CODE REQUIRE 6IN HIGH, 1IN WIDE MINIMUM.PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT HAD ALL OTHER ITEMS BEEN ADDRESSED, THIS WOULD |
| | HAVE BEEN A REDLINE/PROVISO ITEM. |
| | |
| | FBC 602.2 TYPES I AND II. |
| | TYPE I AND II CONSTRUCTION ARE THOSE TYPES OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION IN WHICH THE BUILDING ELEMENTS LISTED |
| | IN |
| | |
| | TABLE 601 ARE OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, WOOD TRUSSES SHOWN; TYPE II IS TO BE |
| | NONCOMBUSTIBLE.ALSO A OR B MUST BE DECLARED AND ANY |
| | FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS REQUIRED SHOWN ON THE PLAN, FBC |
| | TABLE 601.NO INFORMATION PROVIDED IN REGARDS TO |
| | EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING; SEE OTHER COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | COMMENT 3D) FBC 11-4.1.6 II ACCESSIBLE BUILDINGS - |
| | ALTERATIONS |
| | PLANS DO NOT INDICATE OR IDENTIFY THE ACCESSIBLE |
| | ENTRANCE INTO THE BUILDING. PLANS INDICATE A 4?IN |
| | DIFFERENCE IN ELEVATION AT ENTRANCES FROM PARKING AREA |
| | TO UNIT SPACES. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, PLAN STILL SHOW A 4IN ELEVATION CHANGE AT |
| | THE RAMP, SHEET 2.1, EAST SIDE.SEE OTHER COMMENTS |
| | REGARDING ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. |
| | |
| | 11-4.3.1-. ALL WALKS/HALLS/CORRIDORS SHALL BE |
| | ACCESSIBLE |
| | |
| | 3E.FBC 1210.1 AND 1210.2 FLOORS / WALLS |
| | URINALS AND WATER CLOSETS SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH, HARD, |
| | |
| | NON-ABSORBENT SURFACE |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, DRYWALL SHOWN ON THE PLAN.THIS IS NOT A |
| | HARD NON-ABSORBENT SURFACE. |
| | |
| | 3. |
| | B) USE AND OCCUPANCY COMPLETE INFORMATION |
| | C) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION |
| | E) SPRINKLER SYSTEM REQUIREMENT |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, NOT COMPLETELY ADDRESSED.PLEASE SEE OTHER |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4. FBC EXISTING 812.4.2 |
| | HAZARD CATEGORIES IN REGARD TO HEIGHT AND AREA SHALL |
| | BE |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 812.4.2. |
| | SEE TABLE FOR CLASSIFICATIONS |
| | |
| | I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE WHERE THIS WAS ADDRESSED ON THE |
| | PLAN.PLEASE ADVISE.ALSO IT IS NOT CLEAR IF YOU ARE |
| | TREATING THIS AS ONE BUILDING OR TWO BUILDINGS WITH AN |
| | ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE, FBC503.1.3. |
| | |
| | 5. WALL INSULATION VALUES ON ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS DOT NOT MATCH PLAN |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, INPUT DATA REPORT FOR ENERGY CALCS NOT |
| | INCLUDED.INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; NO REVIEW CAN BE |
| | DONE AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | ROOFING SYSTEM TAMKO, HIGHLIGHT SYSTEM USED |
| | AND MATCH ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR SPECIFIED |
| | MATERIALS |
| | |
| | IN SYSTEM |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, A SYSTEM WAS SELECTED BUT REQUIRES |
| | ENGINEERING FOR THE ENHANCED FASTENING FOR ZONES 2 AND |
| | 3.THIS MAY BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME OR AT THE TIME OF |
| | ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION (PROVISO ITEM). |
| | |
| | NOTE THAT A PRELIMINARY REVIEW WAS DONE ON THE NOA |
| | SUBMITTED, BUT IF THIS BUILDING IS A TYPE II, WOOD DECK |
| | CANNOT BE USED AND THE APPROPRIATE NOA SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 6-7.ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 8.FURNISH TRUSS ENGINEERED DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW |
| | |
| | THIS WAS REQUESTED BY PREVIOUS PLANS EXAMINER AND NOT |
| | ADDRESSED.THIS PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED WITH A PROVISO |
| | THAT THEY BE SUBMTTED FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, |
| | BUT THERE ARE OTHER ISSUES WITH THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN. |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR ON SHEET 5.1 WHERE I AND J ARE TO BE |
| | INSTALLED. WHAT DO THE ARROWS ON THE TIE DOWN SCHEDULE |
| | MEAN?WHY ARE THE COLUMNS FOR CALCULATED LATERAL LOAN |
| | BLANK?IF ARROWS INDICATE THE ONES TO BE USED, WHY ARE |
| | THEY BLANK BUT OTHER CONNECTORS HAVE DATA?PROVIDE |
| | DESIGN LOAD CRITERIA (WIND UPLIFT, LATERAL) WITH |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (A RESULT OF PLAN CHANGES WHEN ADDRESSING |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENTS): |
| | |
| | 9.SHEET 3.1 SHOWS AN ACUSTIC CEILING.DO YOU MEAN |
| | ACOUSTIC?THE CEILING SPECIFIED ON 6.1 IS A HUNG |
| | CEILING, BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT IS SHOWN GRAPHICALLY ON |
| | WALL SECTIONS; THEY ARE SHOWN AS ATTACHED TO THE |
| | TRUSSES.PLEASE CLARIFY; PROVIDE A SPECIFICATION FOR |
| | ATTACHMENT. |
| | |
| | 10.FBC1008.1.8, THE HANDRAIL TO THE RAMP OBSTRUCTS |
| | THE DOOR SWING.PLEASE EXPLAIN LOGIC OF HAVING A DOOR |
| | BLOCKING THE CORRIDOR TO THE REQUIRED EXIT, SEE SHEET |
| | 6.1. |
| | |
| | 11.THE BUILDING IS NOTED AS FULLY SPRINKLERED, NO |
| | FIRE ALARM NOTES.SEE FBC11-4.28 AND SHOW REQUIRED |
| | ALARMS IN AREAS SPECIFIED (SUCH AS BATHROOMS). |
| | |
| | 12.SEE OTHER TRADES? COMMENTS REGARDING ENERGY CALCS. |
| | ALL BUILDING COMPONENTS TO BE INCLUDE.THE SQUARE FOOT |
| | AREA DOES NOT MATCH PLAN.ENERGY CALCS ARE TO BE |
| | PREPARED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, NOT CLEAR WHO HAS |
| | SIGNED THIS.PROVIDE A SEAL AND PRINTED NAME. |
| | |
| | 13.SHEET 2.1, CLARIFY WALL FINISH SHOWN AS VINYL |
| | COMPOSITE TILE; APPEARS TO BE FLOORING. |
| | |
| | 14.SPRINKLER PLANS ARE REQUIRED IF SPRINKLERS ARE |
| | REQUIRED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 15.SHEET 2.1, A NOTE WAS ADDED STATING THAT THIS |
| | BUILDING IS A SEPARATE BUILDING FROM THE EXISTING |
| | BUILDING.ANY TIME THAT AN ADDITIONAL STRUCTURE IS |
| | ADDED TO A PARCEL, CODE COMPLIANCE FOR THE NEW |
| | STRUCTURE AS WELL AS THE EXISTING STRUCTURE MUST BE |
| | SHOWN.THE EXISTING STRUCTURE WAS REVIEWED FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE REGARDING DISTANCE TO THE PROPERTY LINE, |
| | SIZE, ETC.ADDING ANOTHER STRUCTURE TO THE PARCEL |
| | CHANGES THE HAZARD TO THE EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 16.SHEET 2.1, DEAD END REFERENCE INCORRECT. |
| | |
| | 17.SHEET 2.1, IT APPEARS THAT YOU ARE USING DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA FOR A FULLY SPRINKLERED BUILDING.SEE OTHER |
| | COMMENTS; IF SPRINKLERS ARE REQUIRED FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE SPRINKLER PLANS MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO |
| | PERMIT ISSUANCE.THIS HAS BEEN VERIFIED BY A |
| | DECLARATORY STATEMENT FROM THE STATE, |
| | FBC*106.3.5.1.1(5), FS553.79 (2). |
| | |
| | 18. SHEET 2.1, SQUARE FOOT AREA 4184, DOES NOT MATCH |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD SQUARE FOOT AREA (2396 AND 1617), AND |
| | DOES NOT MATCH ENERGY CALCS 4023. |
| | |
| | 19. SHEET 2.1, CORRIDOR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING PER FBC |
| | TABLE 1016.1, REQUIREMENTS NOT CLEAR AS A FULLY |
| | SPRINKLERED BUILDING WAS DECLARED, BUT NO INFORMATION |
| | PROVIDED REGARDING THE OTHER BUILDING OR WHETHER THIS |
| | WILL BE A SEPARATE BUILDING WITH AN ASSUMED PROPERTY |
| | LINE, AND NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 20.MAXIMUM DEAD END, SHEET 2.1, WRONG CODE |
| | REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | 21.EXITING FROM THE OTHER BUILDING AND HOW ACCESSIBLE |
| | EXITING HAS BEEN AFFECTED IS NOT CLEAR.IS THE ROUTE |
| | THROUGH THE NEW BUILDING TO THE PUBLIC WAY ALSO AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE EXIT FOR THE OTHER BUILDING, OR DOES IT HAVE |
| | EXITS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING?IT APPEARS |
| | THAT THE EXISTING BUILDING CURRENTLY HAS AN ACCESSIBLE |
| | ROUTE TO THE PUBLIC WAY THROUGH THE EXISTING PARKING |
| | LOT.THIS IS NOW BLOCKED BY THE NEW BUILDING, UNLESS |
| | THEY USE THE CORRIDOR THROUGH THE NEW BUILDING.NO |
| | FIRE RESISTANCE RATING SHOWN, BUT MAY BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 22.THE NOTE REGARDING MAXIMUM TRAVEL ON SHEET 2.1 IS |
| | NOT CLEAR.IT STATES 85FEET PER NOTE D, TABLE 1018.2. |
| | THIS TABLE IS FOR BUILDINGS WITH ONE EXIT, AND NOTE D |
| | IS APPLICABLE FOR BUSINESS OCCUPANCY, BUT THE NEW |
| | BUILDING IS M AND S1 OCCUPANCY.AND, NOTHING ON THE |
| | TABLE SPECIFIES 85FEET. |
| | |
| | 23. (FROM PREVIOUS LIST)FBC 1609.1.4 IMPACT |
| | PROTECTION FOR GLAZED OPENINGSTHIS WILL REQUIRE A |
| | SHUTTER PERMIT AND PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS SUBMITTED |
| | |
| | USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS ON COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MUST |
| | BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.SEE ATTACHED |
| | POLICY, ITEM 13.A PLAN INCLUDING ALL INFORMATION |
| | REFERENCED MUST BE SUBMITTED. THIS MAY BE DONE PRIOR TO |
| | RESUBMITTAL OF THE BUILDING PERMIT PLANS FOR |
| | PRELIMINARY REVIEW, [email protected] TO HAVE |
| | THE PRE STORM PREPARATION PLAN APPROVED PRIOR TO |
| | RESUBMITTAL OF THE PERMIT PACKAGE MAY RESULT IN DELAYS |
| | IN PERMITTING. |
| | |
| | SEE PREVIOUS LIST, IMPACT PROTECTION REQUIRED |
| | FBC1609.1.4.IF USE OF SHUTTERS IS PROPOSED, ATTACHED |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE MUST BE COMPLETED. |
| | |
| | 24.THE COMMENT REGARDING IMPACT FEES WAS ADDRESSED. |
| | PLEASE KEEP THE STAMPED PLAN AND THE RECEIPT IN THE |
| | PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 25.DETAIL 3 3.1 SHOWS A CEILING OVER NEW HALL. |
| | SPECIFY THE NEW CEILING, FBC*106. |
| | |
| | 26.DETAIL 4 4.1 TEST STATES THAT A 1 ? IN WATERSTOP |
| | WILL BE INSTALLED; NONE SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 27. DETAIL 7 4.1 SHOWS A FLASHING DETAIL AT A FRAME |
| | WALL.TYPE II IS DECLARED.WHERE WILL THIS BE |
| | INSTALLED? |
| | |
| | 28.A VALUE ADJUSTMENT WAS DONE USING ICC TABLES. THIS |
| | VALUE MAY CHANGE PENDING CORRECT INFORMATION ON PLANS. |
| | (BUILDING TYPE, SQUARE FOOT AREA) |
| | |
| | 29.SHEET 5.1, CLARIFY ROOF DRAIN CALCULATIONS.SEE |
| | PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING CALCULATIONS AND ROOF |
| | DRAINAGE.ALSO SHOW PARAPET DIMENSION ON THE PARAPET |
| | WALL DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 30.ROOF COMPONENTS AND CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | REQUIRED, FBC1603.1.4. |
| | |
| | 31.SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X PLAN REVIEW |
| | WILL BE CHARGED IF COMMENTS ARE NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED |
| | A THIRD TIME.A FEE MAY BE ASSESSED AT THIS TIME AS |
| | SOME COMMENTS ARE FROM THE FIRST LIST.A SET HAS BEEN |
| | RETAINED. |
