| Date |
Text |
| 2007-09-01 13:15:14 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 07040087 |
| | ADD: 4720 N DIXIE HWY |
| | CONT: NUNNO BUILDERS |
| | TEL: (954)961-0777 |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 2NDREVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE |
| | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED |
| | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE |
| | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT |
| | ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING |
| | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) |
| | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | 3A)THE EDITION OF THE CODE UNDER WHICHTHE PERMIT |
| | WAS ISSUED. WHAT LEVEL OF ALTERATION WILL THIS BE , |
| | 2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE? PLANS INDICATED LEVEL I |
| | PLESE SEE THE REMOVAL OF RESTROOM FACILITIES AND THE |
| | RECONFIGURATION MADE A LEVEL II ALTERATION. THE REMOVAL |
| | OF THE ROOF PARAPET,&MANSARD PLUS THE REST OF THE |
| | DESCRIBED WORK IN THE PROJECT WILL CLASSIFY THIS AS A |
| | LEVEL III ALTERATION. |
| | |
| | 3B) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 3C) PLANS INDICATE THIS BUILDING TO BE A TYPE III |
| | BUILDING PLEASE PROVIDE IF THIS IS A |
| | **A OR B**. IF THE DESIGNER WISHES TO CLASSIFY THIS AS |
| | A MORE RESTIVE IIA OR IIIB THE BUILDING WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED TO MEET THESE RATINGS. THE MINIMUM CODE |
| | CLASSIFIES THIS AS A VB.FOR THIS REVIEW THE REVIEWER |
| | WILL CONTINUE THE REVIEW AS A VB BUILDING, BUT THE NEXT |
| | ROUND OF COMMENTS WILL FOLLOW THE DESIGNERS DESIGNATION |
| | OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 3D-F) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 4) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 5)FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, |
| | PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) |
| | OF PRODUCT |
| | TESTING REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: A) |
| | EFIS WALL SYSTEMS MISSING THE FLORIDA COVER SHEET/ |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD APPROVAL |
| | WITH SHOP DRAWING STAMP. |
| | B) TRUSS ANCHORS NONE SUBMITTED WILL REQUIRE THE |
| | FLORIDA COVER SHEET/ DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD APPROVAL WITH SHOP DRAWING STAMP. |
| | |
| | C) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES- THE FLORIDA COVER SHEET/ |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD APPROVAL |
| | WITH SHOP DRAWING STAMP. SUBSYSTEMS ARE NOT |
| | HIGHLIGHTED. WILL REQUIRE ENHANCED |
| | FASTENING IN ZONES 2 & 3. PROVIDE RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS PER LIMITATION# 7. |
| | |
| | D) FIXED/ STOREFRONT WINDOWS-NONE WERE SUPPLIED. |
| | PROVIDETHE FLORIDA COVER SHEET/ PRODUCT TESTING |
| | SHEETS & DESIGNER OF RECORD APPROVALWITH SHOP |
| | DRAWING STAMP. |
| | |
| | |
| | 6)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 |
| | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION |
| | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE |
| | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER |
| | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, |
| | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR |
| | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. |
| | |
| | 7) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE |
| | PRODUCT WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 8A) 2ND REQUEST, SHEET A-4.1 INDICATES THE FRAMING |
| | DETAIL FOR THE NEWLY DESIGNEDTOWER, SHEET A-4.1 |
| | INDICATES THE NEW TOWER HAS THE CENTER OPEN AND THE |
| | INSIDE WALLS HAVE A MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING MEMBRANE, |
| | THERE APPEARS TO BE NO ROOF DRAIN NOR OVERFLOW SCUPPERS |
| | TO ALLOW THE RAIN WATER OUT OF THIS BOX LOOKING TOWER. |
| | HOW WILL RAIN WATER BE DRAINED? |
| | |
| | 8B) SHEET A.4.0, A.4.1 & A5.0 ALL SHOW THE PARAPET |
| | DETAILS, BUT NONE INDICATE HOW THE |
| | PARAPET WILL BE ATTACHED TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE? |
| | 106.1.2*/ 1609 HOW WILL THE MOMENT OF OVERTURNING BE |
| | RESTRICTED? |
| | |
| | 9) COMPLIED CANOPY AND AWNINGS TO BE UNDER A SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 10)THE NEW RESTROOM LAYOUT HAS DISCREPANCIES, SEE THE |
| | MEN?S RESTROOM DOOR ON SHEET A1.0 VERSES E1.0. SHEET |
| | A1.0 THE IN SWING DOOR INTERFERES WITH THE CLEAR FLOOR |
| | SPACE REQUIRED FOR THE URINAL, 11-4-18-3.SHEET E1.0 |
| | THE DOOR BLOCKS THE EGRESS ROUTE. SEE 1005.2. |
| | |
| | 11) A SECOND DISCREPANCY IS D2 VERSES A.1.0 SHEET A.1.0 |
| | INDICATES WINDOWS 4(A) & 4(B) ON THE DEMO PLAN ONE |
| | WINDOW STAYS AND ONE IS REPLACED. PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| | |
| | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS |
| | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST |
| | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT |
| | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC |
| | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC |
| | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
