| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-02 15:15:00 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW FOURTH CHECKLIST. |
| | |
| | REVIEW DONE UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS (FIRST TIME ENERGY CALCS ARE |
| | SUBMITTED): |
| | A) OWNER/AGENT NEEDS TO SIGN AND DATE BOTTOM OF |
| | FORM. |
| | B) JURISDICTION NUMBER ON TOP OF FORM IS INCORRECT. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | C) COMPLETE ALL INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING NAME OF BUILDER AND PERMITTING OFFICE. |
| | D) CLARIFY WHY THE CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA ON ITEM #4 |
| | IS 210SF, WHILEUNDER ATTIC SQUARE FOOTAGE ON ITEM |
| | #10(A) IS 274SF. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | E) COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TABLE 6C-1. |
| | F) INFORMATION ON TABLE 6C-2 IS WRONG. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2- ROOF FRAMING PLAN: REVISE NUMBER OF FASTENERS |
| | SPECIFIED FOR SIMPSON HETAL20 CONNECTOR.SEE CURRENT |
| | SIMPSON CATALOG AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.OTHERWISE |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSISFOR NUMBER OF |
| | FASTENERS THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED |
| | BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 3- ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND EXISTING WALL:NEED TO |
| | SPECIFY WOOD TO MASONRY CONNECTOR FOR ROOF JOISTS THAT |
| | ARE RESTING ON EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL.FLOOR PLAN |
| | SHOWS THIS WALL AS CONCRETE BLOCK WALL WITH FILLED |
| | CELLS AT DOOR OPENING.CONNECTOR MTS-18IS A WOOD TO |
| | WOOD CONNECTOR. REVISE INFORMATION ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN |
| | AS REQUIRED. CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHAT KIND OF WALL IS THE |
| | EXISTING WALL. IS IT MASONRY OR WOOD FRAMED WALL?. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. (THIS INFORMATION |
| | WAS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST ALSO). |
| | |
| | 4- SOFFIT VENTILATION SPECS SHOWN ON WALL STEM DETAIL |
| | ON SHEET A2 WERE REVISED AGAIN AND STILLDON'T COMPLY |
| | WITH SEC. R806 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.NEED |
| | TO PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION.SEPARATE VENTS DON'T |
| | PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION ON A FLAT ROOFWITH 2X12 |
| | ROOF JOISTS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5- WALL STEM DETAIL ON SHEET A2: SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | INTERIOR CEILING CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT CLEAR.REVISE |
| | INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. REMEMBER THIS IS AN INTERIOR |
| | CEILING. ALSO, WHERE IS THE FIREBLOCKING LOCATED AT?. |
| | THERE ARE NOT TRUSSES IN THIS ROOF EITHER.WHY USING |
| | EXTERIOR GRADE GYPSUM BOARD?. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. REVISE COMPLETE SPECS AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6- REVISE EMERGENCY EGRESS WINDOWS INFORMATION ON SHEET |
| | A2: |
| | A) REVISE REFERENCES. SEC. 1005.4 AND SEC. 105.43 |
| | DON'T CORRESPOND TO 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | B) NET CLEAR OPENING OF 20". IS THIS FOR CLEAR WIDTH?. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | C) EGRESS IS MEASURED BY EGRESS CLEAR OPENING,NOT |
| | MINIMUM TOTAL GLASS AREA. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7- STRUCTURAL LOADS ON SHEET A2: |
| | A) FLOOR AND ROOF LIVE LOADS CAN'T BE 10PSF.REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | B) CLARIFY WHY CEILING DEAD LOAD IS 20LBS?. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | C) CLARIFY WHYSUBMITTING WALL INTERIOR AND |
| | EXTERIOR DEAD LOADS AND WHERE ARE THESE NUMBERSTAKEN |
| | FROM. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | D) SPECIFY BUILDING CODE USED AND WIND LOADS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | THESE INFORMATION WAS GIVEN ON PREVIOUS SUBMITTALS, BUT |
| | NOW IS NOT SHOWN ON PLANS. PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 8- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY RULE 9B-72 |
| | FOR: |
| | A) FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY: |
| | * NOA 04-0506.03 EXPIRED ON 5-23-07. NEED CURRENT ONE. |
| | |
| | ** NOA 04-0506.03 SUBMITTEDHAS NOTHNG TO DO WITH |
| | FL735. |
| | *** CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC APPROVED ASSEMBLY TO BE |
| | INSTALLED. |
| | **** CLEARLY IDENTIFY ASSEMBLY BASE SHEET FASTENING |
| | OPTION. |
| | ***** PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | GENERAL LIMITATION #7. SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON |
| | LAST PAGE OF NOA SUBMITTED. (NOTE: IF GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #7 STATES THAT RAS 117 CALCULATIONS MUST BE |
| | DONE BY A PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT, ENGINEER OR |
| | REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT, THEN SUCH CALCS MUST BE |
| | DONE BY ONE OF THEM ONLY). |
| | |
| | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 9- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | USE COMPANY STANDARD REVIEW STAMP OR WRITE ENGINEERS |
| | NAME AND CLEARLY WRITE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AND SIGNED |
| | BY WHO DID THE REVIEW. PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WERE |
| | REVIEWED BY SOMEBODY ELSE OTHER THAN THE ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD. AND ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE WITHOUT NAME IS NOT |
| | INFORMATION ADEQUATE ENOUGH TO IDENTIFY PERSON WHO |
| | REVIEW THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. THESE COMMENT WAS |
| | ADDRESSED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. |
| | |
| | 10- SURVEY AND FLOOR PLANS DON'T MATCH REVISE |
| | DIMENSIONS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 11- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WAS RECORDED ON 03/30/07. |
| | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS OF |
| | RECORDING IF WORK IS NOT STARTED.SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA |
| | STATUTE. NEED RE-RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. |
| | |
| | 12- NOW TYPICAL WALL SECTION IS MISSING THE ROOF AND |
| | WALL INSULATION. PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 13-600 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
