| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-30 14:43:47 | BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- THIS IS THE THIRD TIME THAT THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | (FORM 600B-04ROR 600C-04R)ARE REQUESTED AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 13-600.3.ABC.3FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 2- ROOF FRAMING PLAN: REVISE NUMBER OF FASTENERS |
| | SPECIFIED FOR SIMPSON HETAL20 CONNECTOR TO ACHIEVE THE |
| | SPECIFIED UPLIFT LOAD.SEE CURRENT SIMPSON CATALOG AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. OTHERWISE, PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO DEMONSTRATE WHY NUMBER OF |
| | FASTENERS IS DIFFERENT THAN THAT TESTED AND PUBLISHED |
| | BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOFFIT |
| | CONSTRUCTION. "STUCCO FINISH SOFFIT" ARE NOT COMPLETE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | 4-SOFFIT VENTILATION WAS CHANGED.NEW SPECS CALL FOR |
| | 7" X 24"AT 24" O.C. VENTS.THEY ARE ARE NOT ENOUGH |
| | TO PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 |
| | FOR FLAT ROOFS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5- REVISE REFERENCES FOR EMERGENCY EGRESS WINDOWS. SEE |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR CORRECT CODE SECTIONS TO BE USED. |
| | ON THE OTHER HAND,EGRESS WINDOWS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR |
| | BATHROOM WINDOWS. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) STORM SHUTTERS. DRAWINGS SUBMITTED ARE NOT AN |
| | APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | ***NOTE: ALSO, CLEARLY INDICATE ON SHUTTER DRAWINGS |
| | SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS (EG; WALL MOUNTED, ETC) |
| | AND SPECIFIC ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE USED. |
| | |
| | B) FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY. AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC |
| | ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED AND SPECIFIC FASTENING OPTION. |
| | |
| | ALSO, PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL ENHANCING |
| | AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #7. |
| | |
| | 7- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***NOTE: ENGINEER NEEDS TO WRITE HIS NAME ON REVIEW |
| | STAMP.REVIEW & APPROVE STAMP ALONE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE |
| | BECAUSE IT DOESN'T SAY WHO REVIEWED THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 8- SURVEY AND FLOOR PLANS DON'T MATCH. SEE DIMENSIONS |
| | AND BUILDING LAYOUT. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
