| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-16 10:29:08 | RESIDENTIAL ALTERATION BUILDING REVIEW SECOND |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW DONE UNDER EXISTING BUILDING CODE 2004,FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE 2004 AND FBC 2004 WITH 2007 |
| | REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: SCOPE OF WORK WAS CHANGED. |
| | |
| | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 713.13FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 2- DESIGNER OF RECORD NEED TO SPECIFYROOF SHEATHING |
| | NAILTYPEAND SPACING INCLUDING NAILING AT ZONE 3 AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | 3- SPECIFY WALL SHEATHING NAIL TYPE AND SPACING.SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***NOTE: SEE HARDIPLANK PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SHEATHING |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4- HARDIPLANKDRAWINGS ON SHEET A2 ARE NOT LEGIBLE. |
| | NEED CLEAR AND LEGIBLE DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 106.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***ALSO,COORDINATE INFORMATION WITH PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | TO AVOID DISCREPANCIES AND EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | SEE REQUIRED STUD SPACING,SHEATHING THICKNESSS, ETC. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5- TYPICAL WINDOW/DOOR OPENING FRAMING DETAIL ON SHEET |
| | A1:REVISE SPECIFIED CONNECTORS. HUGHES IS OUT OF |
| | BUSINESS. |
| | |
| | 6- BASE PLATE DETAIL ON SHEET A1: SPECIFY HOW LONG ARE |
| | THE 1/2" J BOLTS.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | 7- TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A1: |
| | A) REVISE CS-18CONNECTOR SPECIFIED TO ATTACH WALL |
| | TO STEM WALL.NEED TO SPECIFY WOOD TO MASONRY |
| | CONNECTOR. SEE CATALOG FOR PROPER CONNECTOR TYPE AND |
| | TYPE AND NUMBER OF FASTENERS.OTHERWISE PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS FOR NAIL TYPE AND NUMBER |
| | THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE |
| | MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE NUMBER AND TYPE OF FASTENERS SPECIFIED FOR |
| | CS-18 AT CONNECTION TO ROOF TRUSS. SEE CATALOG. |
| | OTHERWISE PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS FOR |
| | FASTENER TYPE AND NUMBER OF FASTENERS THAT DON'T MATCH |
| | THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 8- THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL MUST ELECT THE ALTERATION |
| | LEVEL AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 301.5 OF EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE 2004. |
| | |
| | 9- IDENTIFY WINDOWS IN BEDROOMS THAT ARE GOING TO BE |
| | REPLACEDTO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 505 OF EXISTING BUILDING 2004. |
| | |
| | 10 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) HARDIPLANK.NOA 02-0729.02 SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON |
| | MAY 01/2007. |
| | |
| | B) ALLSIMPSON OR USP STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS |
| | SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | ***NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL PAGE |
| | AND PAGE SHOWING THE CONNECTOR TO EXPEDITE REVIEW AND |
| | SAVE PAPER. |
| | |
| | C) ROOF SHINGLES. |
| | |
| | 11- DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN |
| | WRITING (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | TO FBC 2004 |
| | |
| | 12- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
