| Date |
Text |
| 2007-06-06 19:25:52 | ** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE KNOW THAT AS THERE ARE SOME ITEMS WHICH ARE |
| | FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW AND SOME NEW ITEMS BASED ON |
| | REVISED PLANS AND NEW COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL SOME CODE SECTIONS |
| | ON PLANS WHICH ARE IN NEED O CORRECTING. PLEASE SEE THE |
| | PREVIOUS NOTES FOR ADA ADOPTED CODE FOR CHAPTER 11 OF |
| | THE FBC 2004 W/2006 REVISIONS. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME ARE NOW INDICATING THE * 1992* CODE? |
| | PLEASE SEE THE COVER/T-SHEET IS OK, HOWEVER SEE E002. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE WITH RESPECT TO |
| | SIGNATURES FOR SOME ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING |
| | SHEETS. ONLY ONE LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE ARCHITECT FOR |
| | SIGNATURE VERIFICATION. THIS WAS NOT SIGNED, DATED AND |
| | SEALED. THESE LETTER(S) IN PACKAGE WERE PHOTO-COPIES |
| | AND NOT ORIGINAL. PLEASE ALSO BE SURE THE LETTER IS |
| | CORRECTLY NOTARIZED PER FLORIDA STATUTES 117.05 AS THE |
| | NOTARIZATION AS SUBMITTED DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE |
| | MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED PER SAID STATUE GIVEN. NO |
| | LETTER WAS FOUND FOR ENGINEER MR. LIZASOAIN AND THE |
| | RESPONSE LETTER FROM SGM ENGINEERS DID NOT CONTAIN ANY |
| | RESPONSE FOR THIS NOTE? |
| | THESE WILL BE PLACED IN OUR SIGNATURE FILE FOR ANY NEED |
| | OF FUTURE PROJECTS OR REFERENCE. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE BOTH LETTERS ARE PROPERLY NOTARIZED PER |
| | FS 117.05. THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND ON THE STATES |
| | WEBSITE AT: WWW.LEG.STATE.FL.US/WELCOME/INDEX.CFM ** |
| | THIS COMMENT WAS FOR MR. DOUGLAS AND MR. LIZASOAIN. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2004 FBC |
| | CHAPTER 13 IS STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE SQ FT ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS STILL DOES |
| | NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES ON ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS DO NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE NUMBER OF EACH TYPE OF FIXTURE DOES NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH PLANS. (SHOWS ONE FIXTURE FOR EACH TYPE) |
| | THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | SPECIFICALLY STATE THE NUMBER(S) OF FIXTURE FOR EACH |
| | TYPE. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE WATTAGE FOR FIXTURES AND COORDINATION OF |
| | THE CALCULATIONS TO THE PLANS CAN NOT BE DONE AT THIS |
| | TIME. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE VERSION OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS IS |
| | NOT THE CURRENT VERSION FOR THE 2006 REVISIONS TO THE |
| | 2004 FBC. (3.0) |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT ALL SEPARATE SPACES FOR LIGHTING |
| | CONTROLS AND/OR OVER RIDES NEED TO MEET |
| | 13-415.1.ABC.1.2. PLEASE SEE ANY TYPE OF OVER RIDE |
| | DEVICES NEED TO STATE THE MAXIMUM TIME FOR OVER RIDE OF |
| | SYSTEM OR FOR INDIVIDUAL CONTROL OF A SEPARATE SPACE. |
| | PLANS INCLUDE NEW TIMER SWITCHES FOR SOME ROOMS HOWEVER |
| | NO MAXIMUM TIME(S) IS SHOWN ON LEGEND. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1 (4HRS MAXIMUM FOR TIMER |
| | TYPE(S) AND 30MINUTES MAXIMUM FOR ANY OS TYPE DEVICES. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE ALL OVER RIDE DEVICES AND LOCATIONS ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | PLEASE STATE ALL MAXIMUM OVER RIDE TIMES. |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING EXTERIOR LIGHTING ALLOWANCES ON |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS. PLEASE SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | INDICATE *NONE ENTERED* AND NONE ON THE INPUT DATA |
| | REPORT.HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN PLANS CLEARLY |
| | INDICATE LIGHTING? |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE THE ALLOWED WATTS PER SQ FT ON |
| | TABLE E003 IS COMING FROM? THERE ARE NO NUMBERS IN THE |
| | TABLES OF THE FBC CHAPTER 13-415.2.B, 13-415.2.C.1 |
| | WHICH CONTAIN THESE SAME HIGH NUMBERS. PLEASE SEE THE |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS BEING SUBMITTED IS METHOD A. |
| | PLEASE CALL TO GO OVER THIS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE METHOD OF CONTROL FOR LIGHTING ON ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS IS NOT ENTIRELY ACCURATE AS SOME OF THE |
| | LIGHTING IS NOT ON A PROGRAMMABLE TIMER. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE THE *OWNER AGENT* SPACE ON THE SHEET #2 |
| | FOR CERTIFICATIONS IS SIGNED. THIS IS BLANK AT THIS |
| | TIME.13-103.1.1.1 |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT AS MUCH OF THIS INFORMATION HAS NOT |
| | YET BEEN COORDINATED REVIEW OF THESE ITEMS WILL STILL |
| | NEED TO TAKE PLACE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: THE RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THE EXISTING |
| | SERVICE FOR PREVIOUS RESTAURANT IS OF SUFFICIENT SIZE |
| | AND THE PREVIOUS SERVICE FOR THE BUSINESS OCCUPANCY |
| | WILL NOT BE NEEDED. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL AND NOTES ON |
| | THIS PREVIOUS SERVICE EQUIPMENT INCLUDING, METER, MAINS |
| | AND PANELS BEING DELETED AND REMOVED. |
| | FBC 106.1.3.5.1.2 |
| | NEC 230. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE WHICH REQUESTED |
| | (ALL) SERVICE EQUIPMENTTO BE SHOWN ON PLANS. MOST |
| | WERE LOCATED ON PREVIOUS PLANS HOWEVER HDP COULD NOT BE |
| | LOCATED. |
| | PLEASE SPECIFY THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT, ELECTRICAL |
| | PANELS, AND TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS. ARE THESE LOCATED IN |
| | AN ELECTRICAL ROOM? |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ROOM AND AREA DESIGNATIONS FOR ALL AREAS |
| | AND ROOMS. |
| | AS REQUESTED PLEASE INDICATE ROOMS AND USE AS SECOND |
| | FLOOR ROOM FOR SOME OF THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IS NOT |
| | IDENTIFIED. |
| | 110.26, 240.24, 450.11, 450.13, 408.7 ETC |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LOAD CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE |
| | NOT COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE |
| | LOAD SUMMARY ON HOW LOADS WERE DERIVED FOR SERVICE. |
| | PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO SHOW WINDOWS, |
| | SIGN CIRCUIT. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW AND WHERE CU 1,2,3,4 |
| | AND 5 ARE FED? LOADS ON A/C HEAT ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE LOADS ON EACH PANEL ARE NOT CLEAR WHERE AND |
| | WHAT TYPE OF DE-RATING IS BEING DONE. (EXAMPLE, PLEASE |
| | SEE RECEPTACLES WHICH INDICATES FOR DEMANDON EACH |
| | PANEL COLUMN * NEC *. THIS IS OK FOR LOADS ON PANELS |
| | HOWEVER HOW ARE NO RECEPTACLE LOADS SHOWN ON LDP? IT IS |
| | BEING ASSUMED HOW LOADS ARE BEING FIGURED, HOWEVER AS |
| | THESE ARE RECORD SETS OF PLANS, THESE SHOULD COORDINATE |
| | WITH THAT OF THE NEC. |
| | PLEASE SHOW DETAILED LOAD CALCULATIONS. 215.3, 230.42, |
| | 220.12, 220.14, 220.42, 220.43, 220.44, ETC. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE MISSING SIGN CIRCUIT IS NOW |
| | SHOWN HOWEVER THE LOAD AS INDICATED DOES NOT MEET THE |
| | MINIM PER 600.5 (1200VA MIN) |
| | PLEASE SEE 220.43A FOR LOADS FOR SHOW WINDOW |
| | RECEPTACLES. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS ON |
| | THE LIGHTING CONTROL PANELS. THIS WAS REQUESTED ON THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS SHEETS ADDED TO |
| | PLANS, HOWEVER NO LISTINGS COULD BE LOCATED AND |
| | SPECS/CUT SHEETS ON ACTUAL LIGHTING CONTROL/DIMMING |
| | PANELS ARE BEING REQUESTED FOR REVIEW. 110.3, 90.7. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PHOTO-METRICS WERE SUBMITTED AS |
| | PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR REVIEW OF LIGHTING LEVELS OF |
| | EGRESS PATHS UNDER NORMAL AND EMERGENCY CONDITIONS |
| | HOWEVER PLANS MENTIONS AND SHOWS NUMEROUS |
| | *EMERGENCY/NIGHT LIGHT* BATTERY BACK UP TYPE OF |
| | FIXTURES SHOWN AS BEING DIMMED TO AS MUCH AS 30%. HOW |
| | IS THE MINIMUM NORMAL AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING LEVELS |
| | STILL OBTAINED AS REQUIRED UNDER THE LIFE SAFETY CODE |
| | WHEN THE DIMMED LEVELS FALL BELOW THE 10FT CANDLES FOR |
| | STAIRS UNDER NORMAL AND UNDER 1FT CANDLE FOR STAIRS |
| | UNDER EMERGENCY. HOW ARE THE MINIMUM LIGHTING LEVELS |
| | MET FOR ALL OTHER EGRESS PATHS UNDER EMERGENCY WHEN |
| | LIGHTS ARE DIMMED AT 30%? ONE STAIR DOES INDICATE A |
| | NOTE WHICH STATES THE LIGHTING FIXTURES WILL BE WIRED |
| | AHEAD OF LIGHTING CONTROL AND DIMMING PANELS. PLEASE |
| | KNOW AT THIS TIME THIS INFORMATION IS BEING FORWARDED |
| | TO THE FIRE MARSHAL FOR REVIEW. |
| | THIS IS REQUIRED FOR LIFE SAFETY AND TRIPPING HAZARDS. |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE WHEN OLD/VOIDED ARE REMOVED |
| | THAT WHEN NEW SHEETS ARE INSERTED OR WHEN NEW SETS ARE |
| | SUBMITTED THAT ALL SHEETS ARE BOUND INTO SETS. PLEASE |
| | SEE THAT ALL THE MEP SHEETS WERE SUBMITTED LOOSE IN |
| | SETS. |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: PLEASE LABEL LIGHTING/DIMMING PANELS. (D-1, |
| | D-2) |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO |
| | REPEAT CODE COMPLIANT COMMENTS. THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE |
| | GIVEN AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW AS THERE IS INFORMATION NOT YET |
| | SUBMITTED, THERE MAY NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW ONCE PLANS ARE COMPLETED FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME ITEMS ARE REDLINED ON ONE OF THE |
| | SETS FO PLANS FOR SOME ITEMS WHICH MAY HELP LOCATE |
| | NOTES AS TYPES. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW: PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS |
| | WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF THERE ARE |
| | ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, NOT |
| | UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO NOT |
| | HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
