| Date |
Text |
| 2008-03-06 13:38:07 | 4X PLAN REVIEW FEE IS REMOVED PENDING STATE RULING. |
| 2008-02-11 09:39:44 | ** DENIED 4TH REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING NOTES.SOME OF THESE NOTES |
| | ARE THE SAME EXACT NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW AND SOME |
| | ARE NEW BASED ON CHANGES MADE TO PLANS WHICH WERE NOT |
| | PART OF PREVIOUS PLANS. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS WHICH |
| | WERE SUBMITTED BACK ARE THE EXACT SAME AS PREVIOUSLY |
| | SUBMITTED WITH THE SAME DATE AND PHOTO-COPIED SIGNATURE |
| | BY THE ENGINEER. ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANCE INC EVEN HAS |
| | *SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP* DATED 1/25/08 WHICH STATES |
| | A NOTE THAT THEY NEED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED. THIS |
| | SAME COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO FLORIDA STATUTES 471.025 |
| | AND FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002 HAS BEEN |
| | MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS AND IS STILL NOT BEING DONE. |
| | THIS OFFICE IS LEFT WITH NO CHOICE TO TURN DOCUMENTS |
| | OVER TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND |
| | PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS FOR THE BOARD. THIS REVIEWER HAS |
| | STATED ON ALL PREVIOUS REVIEWS THAT IF THERE WERE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS WITH RESPECT TO THIS TO PLEASE CONTACT THIS |
| | OFFICE HOWEVER NO CONTACT BY THIS DESIGNER HAS BEEN |
| | MADE. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED UPS FOR EMERGENCY BACK UP FOR REQUIRED EGRESS |
| | LIGHTING. |
| | THE SHEET NOW SUBMITTED DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY LISTING |
| | FROM ANY NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY |
| | (NRTL). |
| | THE SHEET SUBMITTED STATES 120 OR 277VOLTS ONLY. SOME |
| | HAND DRAWN CHANGES HAVE NOW BEEN MADE TO THIS |
| | INDICATING 240V. IF THE MANUFACTURE DOES NOT INDICATE |
| | THE VOLTAGE ON THEIR OWN TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS WITH |
| | RESPECT TO VOLTAGE OF LIGHTING ON PLANS THIS MAY NOT BE |
| | HAVE CHANGES MADE. |
| | PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE LIGHTING FOR STAIRS IN EGRESS |
| | MORE SPECIFICALLY*C* OR C1 FIXTURES MEET BACK UP AS |
| | COULD NOT LOCATE QUARTZ RE-STRIKE AS MENTIONED FOR |
| | EITHER *C* OR C1* ARE THESE FIXTURES RATED FOR OUTDOOR |
| | USE AS THESE ARE ALSO SHOWN FOR OUTDOOR WALL PACKS. |
| | THIS EQUIPMENT IS NOT ACCEPTED AT THIS TIME. |
| | LS 101 7.8, 7.9, NEC 110.3, 90.7 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: *** NEW NOTE ** |
| | THIS COMMENT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE ON PREVIOUS PLANS |
| | AS RISER WAS REVISED. |
| | PLEASE SEE RISER NOW SHOWS A NEW MAIN 5 OF 5 TO NEW |
| | WIREWAY *A* YET THE SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS FOR NEW |
| | ADDED LOAD AND NEW MAIN WAS NOT INCREASED??? THE NEW |
| | LOAD SHOWN FOR THE NEW WIREWAY *A* IS SHOWING A LOAD OF |
| | 437AMPS ALONE. |
| | PLEASE SEE 240.4, 310.16 AS SERVICE IS OVER 800AMPS, |
| | THE LOAD IS OVER 840AMPS WHICH IS THE RATING OF THE |
| | SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS AS SHOWN. |
| | ** ANY FUTURE LOADS? |
| | 240.4,310.16,110.14 ETC |
| | FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND |
| | COORDINATION. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE AREAS WHERE NEW |
| | SERVICE, NEW EQUIPMENT, NEW PANELS AND NEW UPSE IS |
| | HATCHED AS TO LEND TO THIS SCOPE OF WORK NOT PART OF |
| | THIS SET OF PLANS OR SCOPE OF WORK. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE SHEET E3.1 DOES NOT NOW SHOW THE |
| | PANELS LD OR LE FROM WIREWAY *A*.PANEL LC IS SHOWN |
| | AND LABELED. THIS CAN NOT BE ASSUMED. |
| | PLEASE COORDINATE AND SHOW ALL. |
| | 110.26, 240.24, |
| | FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 FOR COORDINATION AND |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE EXTERIOR LIGHTING POWER ALLOWANCES |
| | ARE STILL NOT COMPLETE. PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.3. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS DO NOT CORRELATE THE FIXTURE |
| | LEGENDS ETC |
| | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | SHEET 1.1 AND 1.2 WHICH IS THE SITE LIGHTING PLANS |
| | SHOWS *A* FIXTURES, YET THE FIXTURE LEGEND INDICATES |
| | THESE AS INTERIOR 400A HIGH BAYS. HOW IS THIS |
| | POSSIBLE? |
| | SHEET 1.1 AND 1.2 SHOWS EXTERIOR WALL LIGHT FIXTURES AS |
| | *C* YET SHEET 2.1 SHOWS THESE SAME FIXTURES AS *C1*. |
| | THE FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY *C* FIXTURES. |
| | AS THERE ARE THERE STILL QUESTIONS AND ITEMS NOT |
| | COMPLETE PLEASE BE SURE TO GO OVER ALL ITEMS BEFORE |
| | RESUBMITTING PLANS. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE REVISED DETAIL ON E0.1 DOES NOT |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR TIME CLOCK TYPE AND BACK UP PER |
| | 13-415.1.ABC.1.4. |
| | PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE OF TWO METHODS ARE PERMITTED OR |
| | BOTH MAY BE DONE. WHERE IS ASTRONOMICAL TIME CLOCK? |
| | WHERE IS BACK UP FOR TIME CLOCK FOR THE REQUIRED |
| | 10HRS? |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO |
| | REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THE CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE FOR LIGHTING CALCULATIONS AND SPECIFIC CODE |
| | SECTIONS 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.3 HAVE BEEN REPEATED |
| | FOR THE LAST THREE REVIEWS AND BACK TO THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW ALSO. |
| | PLEASE SEE A FEE AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTES AS |
| | NOTED ABOVE IS ASSESSED. IT IS RECOMMENDED A MEETING BE |
| | HELD TO GO OVER COMMENTS BEFORE PLANS ARE RESUBMITTED |
| | FOR THE 5TH REVIEW. PLANS DO NOT COORDINATE ETC AS |
| | NOTED ABOVE. |
| | THIS FEE OF $53,299.87 IS DUE BEFORE NEXT RE-SUBMITTAL |
| | AS REQUIRED UNDER THE FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | ONCE AGAIN IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL TO |
| | GO OVER. IF A MEETING IS NEEDED TO SIT DOWN AND GO OVER |
| | COMMENTS ARE CLEAR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING |
| | THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
