| Date |
Text |
| 2007-06-27 19:04:35 | |
| | |
| | *** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW *** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARESEVERAL COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. PLEASE |
| | SEE THERE ARE SOME NEW COMMENTS BASED ON PLANS AND |
| | REVISIONS TO PLANS WHICH INFORMATION IS ONLY NOW BEING |
| | SUBMITTED. MOST OF THE COMMENTS ARE FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW AND WILL BE INDICATED AS SUCH. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS NOTES FROM MULTIPLE |
| | REVIEWERS WHICH INDICATED *IMPORTANT*.ONE OF THESE |
| | NOTES WAS TO *COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | FROM SETS* AND ONLY INSERT THE NEW REVISED SHEETS INTO |
| | THE COMPLETED SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. THIS WAS |
| | NOT DONE AND ALL OF OLD SHEETS WERE LEFT IN SETS. THESE |
| | WERE NOT MARKED/LABELED AS VOID OR ANY INDICATION THEY |
| | WERE NOT CURRENT. PLANS WERE REVIEWED BASED ON REVISION |
| | DATES. ANY SHEETS WHICH WERE NOT REVISED AND LEFT FROM |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW MAY HAVE COMMENTS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THIS WILL NOT BE DONE BY THIS OFFICE AND |
| | OLD PLANS/SHEETS MUST BE REMOVED. |
| | CALLED ELITE EXPEDITORS AS LISTED ON RE-SUB COVER SHEET |
| | FOR CONTACT AND INFORMED JENNIFER MELANSON THIS NEEDED |
| | TO BE DONE. AS PLANS ARE COMING BACK TO ADDRESS CODE |
| | COMMENTS THIS WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE DONE BEFORE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL. IF PLANS ARE SUBMITTED WITHOUT THIS DONE, |
| | PROCESSING FOR REVIEW WILL NOT BE DONE AND PLANS WILL |
| | BE PLACED OUT-FRONT FOR PICK UP. |
| | ** PLEASE ALSO KNOW THAT ONLY TWO COMPLETE SETS ARE |
| | NEEDED FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK. PLEASE KNOW THIS OFFICE |
| | WILL STAMP UP TO THREE, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE 12 SETS OF |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED AND ONLY THREE WILL |
| | BE STAMPED ONCE CODE COMPLIANT. |
| | FBC 106.3.1 |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS MUST CONTAIN THE |
| | PRE-APPROVED/REVIEWED STAMP AND SIGNATURE ON ALL PLANS |
| | FROM CITY PLACE MANAGEMENT/LANDLORD BEFORE THEY ARE |
| | STAMPED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH FOR PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. THE PREVIOUS PLANS WERE STAMPED HOWEVER THE |
| | NEW SHEETS WERE NOT. |
| | FBC 106.1 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE TITLE BLOCKS FOR ARCHITECTURAL |
| | SHEETS ARE STILL MISSING THE PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER FOR |
| | THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| | PLEASE SEE THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS ARE MISSING THE |
| | PRINTED NAME OF THE ARCHITECT ON TITLE BLOCKS AS |
| | REQUIRED PER FAC61G1-16.004. |
| | * THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER |
| | TRADE(S). |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED BACK |
| | WITH THE SAME VALUE ON PERMIT APPLICATION AND NO |
| | CHANGES WERE MADE. THE APPLIED VALUE MUST INCLUDE ALL |
| | LABOR, MATERIALS, PERMANENTLY INSTALLED EQUIPMENT, |
| | DESIGN/ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURAL FEES ETC EVEN IF ANY |
| | OF THESE ITEMS ARE OWNER SUPPLIED. PLEASE KNOW A VALUE |
| | WILL BE ASSESSED USING ADOPTED GUIDES PER THE FBC IF AN |
| | APPROPRIATE VALUE IS NOT ADJUSTED ON APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE THE VALUE FOR THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK |
| | SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS EVEN IF |
| | MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, ETC IS OWNER SUPPLIED AS STATED |
| | ON PLANS. |
| | VALUE IS LOW AT THIS TIME. PLEASE ADJUST. |
| | PLEASE KNOW A VALUE MAY BE ADJUSTED BY THIS OFFICE |
| | USING ADOPTED DOCUMENTS INTO THE FBC. |
| | FBC 108.3 |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FBC CHAPTER 13 |
| | HAS NOT YET BEEN ACHIEVED. PLEASE SEE EH FOLLOWING |
| | ITEMS: |
| | A) PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT CORRECT. |
| | |
| | B)PLEASE SEE THE NUMBER OF LUMINAIRES NEED TO |
| | COORDINATE WITH PLANS. |
| | C) PLEASE SEE THE WATTAGE OF LUMINAIRES NEED TO |
| | CORRELATE WITH PLANS. |
| | D) PLEASE SEE THE METHOD OF CONTROLS NEEDS TO CORRELATE |
| | WITH PLANS. |
| | E) PLEASE SEE THE OWNER AGENT IS NOT SIGNED ON SHEET 2 |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | F) PLEASE SEE NO TIME OF DAY SCHEDULING WAS SUBMITTED |
| | AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. |
| | F) PLEASE SEE NO LOCATION FOR ALL OVER RIDE DEVICES |
| | WERE SHOWN ON PLANS. THE ONLYOVER RIDE DEVICE AS |
| | NOTED IS LOCATED AT THE LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL WHICH |
| | DOES NOT MEET THE CODE. |
| | H) PLEASE SEE ALL SEPARATE SPACES CONTAINING FLOOR TO |
| | CEILING HEIGHT PARTITIONS REQUIRES DEVICES: NONE WERE |
| | SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | I) PLEASE SEE MISSING SEPARATE CONTROLS FOR |
| | DISPLAY/ACCENT LIGHTING. |
| | J) PLEASE SEE NOT EXTERIOR LIGHTING WAS FIGURED INTO |
| | THE CALCULATIONS. (PLEASE SEE NOTE #8) |
| | **PLEASE KNOW AS THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME ANY |
| | DESIGN/INFORMATION FOR CHAPTER 13 WAS SUBMITTED PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS THESE COMMENTS AND SEE THE PREVIOUS NOTE BELOW |
| | FOR ALL CODE SECTIONS AND SEE ALL OF CHAPTER 13 AS |
| | THERE ARE TOO MANY TO BE STATED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE THE 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS FOR CHAPTER |
| | 13. AT THIS TIME THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS MISSING FOR |
| | REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE SEE NO SCHEDULING OF SYSTEM WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE NO INFORMATION ON A SYSTEM WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE NO OVER RIDE DEVICES AT THE POINTS OF |
| | EGRESS/INGRESS INTO SPACE FROM ENTRANCE WIN WHICH THE |
| | OCCUPANT CAN SEE THE LIGHTING WHICH IS BEING |
| | CONTROLLED. |
| | PLEASE SEE NO TIMES ON ANY OVER RIDE DEVICES AND TYPES |
| | OF DEVICES. |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS. |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING CERTIFICATIONS PER DESIGNER(S) OF |
| | RECORD. |
| | PLEASE SEE REQUIRED CALCULATION METHODS FOR TRACK |
| | LIGHTING. 13-415.2.ABC.1.2 |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-103.1, 13-415.1ABC.1, 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, |
| | .1.2 AND .1.3, 13-415.1.AB.1.1, 13-415.1.A, .B AND .C, |
| | 13-415.2 AND TABLES UNDER THE NEW 2006 REVISIONS. ETC. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE CD LEVELS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR |
| | MINIMUM ADA COMPLIANCE DOES NOT MEET THE FBC AS |
| | PREVIOUSLY STATED IN NOTES. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FBC WHICH CONTAINS MORE RESTRICTIVE |
| | REQUIREMENTS THANNFPA. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3(4) AND STATE |
| | THE MINIMUM HORN, STROBE LEVELS ON PLANS FOR ADA |
| | REQUIRED AREAS. DEVICES ARE BEING SHOWN ON LEGEND ONLY. |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE ON LAYOUT OF PLANS AND DEVICES. PLEASE |
| | KNOW EVEN THOUGH FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM WORK |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT THE BASE |
| | FIRE ALARM DEVICES ALONG WITH FIRE PROTECTION WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED IN BASE PLANS. THIS WILL BE NOTED BY THE FIRE |
| | AND BUILDING REVIEWER(S) ALSO. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THE SIGN |
| | CIRCUIT WAS REMOVED FROM PANEL? WHY WAS THIS DONE? |
| | PLEASE SEE THE MINIMUM OF ONE CIRCUIT IS REQUIRED AT |
| | THE ENTRANCE LOCATION WHETHER OR NOT A SIGN INSTALLED |
| | AND IS TO BE FROM THE TENANT SPACE PANEL. THE EXISTING |
| | SIGNS LOCATED AT CITY PLACE ARE FROM EACH TENANT AND |
| | ONLY THE COMMON AREA SIGNS FOR CITY PLACE NOT THE |
| | TENANT ARE FROM THE HOUSE PANEL. 600.5 |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING SIGN CIRCUIT ON PLANS AND PANEL |
| | SCHEDULE PER 600.5. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ANY EXTERIOR LIGHTING FOR COMMON |
| | AREA WALLS ETC ARE FROM CITY PLACE HOUSE. PLEASE SEE |
| | THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IF UNDER THE |
| | LANDLORDS PANEL AND AREA WILL BE REQUIRED UNDER |
| | SEPARATE PERMITS AND PLANS. PLEASE OBTAIN COORDINATION |
| | FROM THE CITY PLACE MANAGEMENT AND LANDLORD FOR THIS. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS AS THERE WERE NO EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIGURED |
| | INTO THE CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS NOW MENTIONS AND SHOWS AN |
| | EXISTING 400AMP SERVICE WAS ALREADY PRESENT FOR THIS |
| | SPACE, HOWEVER THE EXISTING 400AMP SERVICE WAS FOR A |
| | MUCH LARGER SPACE WHICH IS NOW SPLIT UP TO MORE THAN |
| | ONE TENANT. PLANS WHICH HAVE ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED BY |
| | THE NEW TENANT FOR UPSTAIRS HAS ALREADY INDICATED THE |
| | *EXISTING 400AMP SERVICE* IS BEING USED FOR THEIR |
| | SPACE? PLEASE KNOW THE COORDINATION BETWEEN THE TWO |
| | TENANTS AND THE LANDLORD IS IMPERATIVE FOR THIS. THE |
| | LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THE EXISTING 1200AMP SERVICE FOR |
| | EACH OF THE NEW TENANTS INCLUDING THE LOAD FOR EACH OF |
| | THE NEW TENANTS WILL BE REQUIRED ON EACH SET OF RECORD |
| | PLANS. |
| | THIS INFORMATION IS A MUST AND A COMPLETE BREAKDOWN OF |
| | THE EXISTING AND NEW WILL BE NEEDED. AN ONSITE MEETING |
| | MAY ALSO BE ARRANGED TO GO OVER THIS. |
| | 215.5,230,220,240, ETC NEC. THERE ARE TOO MANY SECTIONS |
| | OF CODE WHICH APPLY SPECIFICALLY TO THIS. |
| | FBC 106.3.5.1.2 |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** PLEASE VERIFY SERVICE AS |
| | SHOWN AS THE RISER MENTIONS THE METER IS BEING DONE BY |
| | THE LANDLORD?? THIS SCOPE OF WORK HAS NOT BEEN DONE/OR |
| | APPLIED FOR. PLEASE SEE THE RISER SEEMS TO SHOW THE NEW |
| | TENANT MAIN AS NEMA 3R WHICH LENDS TO THIS BEING |
| | LOCATED OUTSIDE? PLEASE KNOW THAT THIS BUILDING |
| | CONTAINS AN INDOOR ELECTRICAL ROOM WHERE ALL TENANT |
| | MAIN DISCONNECTS ARE LOCATED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LAYOUT |
| | FOR LOCATIONS AND LOADS OF THE NEW ON THE EXISTING MAIN |
| | WITH THE EXISTING LOADS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW AT THIS TIME THERE ARE ITEMS WHICH CAN NOT |
| | BE REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | PLEASE SEE NEC 220 IN THE 2005 NEC AS THE CALCULATIONS |
| | AND LOAD SUMMARY FOR THIS SERVICE AND LOADS WITH |
| | EXISTING SERVICE NEED TO BE SHOWN PER NEW CODE. PLEASE |
| | SEE PLANS WHICH CONTAIN CODE SECTIONS FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | NEC. |
| | FBC 106.3.5.1.2 |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED |
| | RISER AND THIS WAS ADDRESSED, HOWEVER THE RISER |
| | INDICATES *IF*?? PLEASE SEE THIS METER IS INSTALLED |
| | AFTER THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT AND A FLOATING |
| | NEUTRAL KIT IS REQUIRED. PERHAPS THIS CAN BE VERIFIED |
| | BY THE DESIGNER/DESIGN TEAM OF RECORD WHEN SITE VISIT |
| | IS DONE FOR NOTE #9 ABOVE. |
| | 250.6,250.24. |
| | FBC 106.3.5.1.2 |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| | PLEASE INDICATE A *FLOATING NEUTRAL* IN METER AS |
| | REQUIRED PER 250.6 AND 250.24. THIS WILL ALLEVIATE ANY |
| | OBJECTIONABLE CURRENTS. |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE:PLEASE SEE RESPONSE MENTIONS THE SECTIONS OF |
| | THE NEC WAS ADDED TO PLANS WHICH IS CORRECT HOWEVER |
| | PLEASE SEE THE CIRCUITING ON PANEL LP TO BE EXACT STILL |
| | NOTES THE EM/EXT LTS ON A DEDICATED CIRCUIT? THIS DOES |
| | NOT CORRELATE WITH THE CIRCUITING AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | PLEASE ADJUST. |
| | 408.4, FBC 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE 700.12E FOR CIRCUITING OF EMERGENCY LIGHTING |
| | AND EXIT LIGHTING.THE PLAN MENTIONS 701, 701.11F |
| | WHICH IS NOT APPLICABLE. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RESPONSE MENTIONS THE AIC RATINGS |
| | ARE STATED ON ALL EQUIPMENT HOWEVER THE RATING OF THE |
| | NEW FUSED MAIN COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON PLANS. PLEASE |
| | ALSO VERIFY THE RATINGS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON ALL PANELS |
| | FOR THE PANEL AND BRANCH BREAKERS. PLEASE SEE THE |
| | RATINGS FOR THE BRANCH BREAKERS AS STATED SEEM HIGH, |
| | HOWEVER ARE OK AND DO NOT VIOLATE ANY CODE. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE BE SURE ALL EQUIPMENT CONTAINS THE AIC RATINGS |
| | AS REQUIRED PER 110.9. PLEASE INDICATE FOR THE NEW MAIN |
| | ON RISER AS SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURES SPEC/CUT |
| | SHEETS FOR THIS EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SEE THE NOTE FOR |
| | CHAPTER 13 AS THE RISER AND EQUIPMENT IN RISER MAY |
| | CHANGE. |
| | THE NOTE ON PLANS MENTIONS THE LISTING AND OTHER |
| | INFORMATION ABOUT CONTACT INFORMATION ETC HOWEVER THE |
| | REQUEST WAS TO SUBMIT THE DOCUMENTS FOR THIS EQUIPMENT |
| | AT THIS TIME FOR REVIEW. |
| | 110.3,90.7. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURES SPEC/CUT SHEETS ON THE |
| | PROPOSED POWER DISTRIBUTION CENTER FOR REVIEW. PLEASE |
| | BE SURE LISTINGS FROM A NRTL( NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED |
| | TESTING LABORATORY) IS SHOWN. |
| | 110.3, 90.7. |
| | FBC 106.1.2. |
| | |
| | 14) NOTE:THIS NOTE REMAINS AS THE COLOR CODING ADDED |
| | TO THE NOTES WAS NOT AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE> |
| | THIS IS TO BE BROWN (A) ?PURPLE (B) AND YELLOW (C). |
| | PLEASE SEE THIS MUST HAVE BEEN A MISPRINT. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE THE COLOR CODING SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS. |
| | 277/480V SYSTEMS, BROWN, PURPLE, YELLOW. |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT THE NEC HAS *ORANGE* DESIGNATED FOR |
| | MARKING OF A *HIGH-LEG* IN AN OPEN DELTA SYSTEM WHICH |
| | IS NOT WHAT IS BEING INSTALLED. |
| | PLEASE KNOW AS PER LOCAL JURISDICTIONS AND LOCAL WIRING |
| | AT THE LOCATION OF SAID PROJECT THE COLOR CODING OF THE |
| | EXISTING SYSTEMS IN THIS BUILDING IS AS NOTED. 90.4 |
| | |
| | 15) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE MOTE INFORMATION ON THE |
| | LOCATION OF THIS VERY LARGE TRANSFORMER. PLEASE SEE THE |
| | LOCATION DOES NOT SEEM TO GIVE THE WORKING CLEARANCES |
| | AS REQUIRED PER THE NEC. PLEASE SUBMIT ELEVATION |
| | DETAILS FOR THIS LOCATION AS THE UNIT SHALL NOT BE |
| | ENCLOSED, CLOSE TO IGNITABLE MATERIALS, AND MUST MEET |
| | THE CLEAR SPACE ETC. PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL |
| | SUPPORT DETAIL FOR MOUNTING OF SAID UNIT. THESE ITEMS |
| | WILL BE REVIEWED FOR NUMEROUS NEC CODES INCLUDING |
| | STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY. |
| | FBC 106.3.5.1.2, NEC 450.13B, 450.21, 450.9, 110.26, |
| | 408.7 ETC. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE 240.21 AS THE LENGTH OF CONDUCTORS IS |
| | OF CONCERN TO MEET THIS SECTION OF THE NEC. AT THIS |
| | TIME THE MCB IN THE MDP APPEARS TO BE TOO FAR AWAY |
| | BASED ON THE LENGTH OF CONDUCTORS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE THE TRANSFORMER WHICH IS BEING SHOWN ABOVE |
| | OFFICE IS NOT PERMITTED AT THIS LOCATION PER 450.13B |
| | AND 450.21B. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS AND INFORMATION ON TYPE OF |
| | TRANSFORMER. THE LOCATION IS NOT PERMITTED BASED ON |
| | PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| | 110.3, 90.7 |
| | FBC 106.3.5.1.2 |
| | |
| | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA STATUTES 553.80(2)(B) WITH |
| | RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. PLEASE |
| | SEE THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME. ** PLEASE |
| | KNOW ONE SET OF PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE |
| | AND WILL BE PLACED WITH PREVIOUSLY RETAINED PLANS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW AS THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS NOT SHOWN OR |
| | SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, THE COMPLETE REVIEW FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE CAN ONLY BE BASED ON THE PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE ANY COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES |
| | WHICH MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS AND DESIGN CHANGES. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2007-06-27 16:47:22 | PLANS WERE REMOVED FROM INCOMING AND WILL BE RETURNED |
| | ONCE ELECTRICAL REVIEW IS DONE. |
