| Date |
Text |
| 2007-08-02 10:15:49 | PANERA BREAD 2ND REV |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 07030523 |
| | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY# 142 |
| | CONT: PEMBERTON BUILDERS |
| | TEL: (561)718-8624 |
| | |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 2NDREVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2) FL S S 713.13 |
| | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF |
| | THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN |
| | THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED |
| | WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE |
| | IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6)THE POSTING OF THE |
| | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE |
| | THE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | 3)BUILDING PROVISO: 109.3.10.1 HURRICANE PROTECTION. |
| | IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO ALLOW |
| | CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS TO |
| | REMAIN LOOSE OR OTHERWISE UNSECURED AT A CONSTRUCTION |
| | SITE FROM 24 HRS. AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN |
| | ISSUED UNTIL THE HURRICANE WATCH OR WARNING HAS BEEN |
| | LIFTED. ALL SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND |
| | DEBRIS SHALL BE EITHER REMOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION |
| | SITE OR SECURED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE THE |
| | DANGER OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND |
| | DEBRIS CAUSING DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY FROM HIGH |
| | WINDS. ANY PERSONS WHO FAILS TO COMPLY TO REMOVE OR |
| | SECURE THE CONSTRUCTIONMATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS |
| | WITHIN 24 HRS AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED |
| | SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $500.00. IN |
| | ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, A LICENSED CONTRACTOR WHO |
| | VIOLATES THIS SECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE |
| | PURSUANT TO SECTION 113 OF THIS CHAPTER. |
| | |
| | 4-5) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 6) 2ND REQUEST, 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. IN |
| | WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT |
| | RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 |
| | M) IN BUILDINGS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE |
| | BALANCE OF GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING |
| | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT |
| | RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR |
| | PROTECTED WITH AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, |
| | OR MIAMI-DADE TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN |
| | AS FOLLOWS: |
| | 1.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) |
| | OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE |
| | MISSILE TEST. |
| | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 |
| | M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL |
| | MISSILE TEST. |
| | |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SIGNED OFF BY ARCHITECT LOUISE K |
| | CRAVER APPARENTLY MISSED THIS IS A NON-RATED ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | 7) 2ND REQUEST,7)FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING, |
| | ROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) |
| | , |
| | NOT THE (12) TWELVE COPIES SUBMITTED, OF PRODUCT |
| | TESTING REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:A) |
| | STOREFRONT WINDOWS: YKK SERIES YHS-50 FINOA |
| | 02-0618.08 |
| | 12 SETS ONLY 2 ARE REQUIRED, THIS REPORT IS A 1994 |
| | TEST REPORT AND THE FASTENERS TOOK 1 1/3 STEEL |
| | INCREASES NOT ALLOWED BYTHE 2004 FBC. REQUIRES REVIEW |
| | BY A FLORIDA PE OR TAKE THE DESIGN PRESSURES LISTED IN |
| | THE NOA AND DIVIDE BY 1.33 TO COMPLY WITH THE 2004 |
| | FBC. |
| | PLEASE HIGHLIGHT THE TYPE OF GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED IN |
| | THESE UNITS. IT APPEARS THAT THERE MAY BE PROBLEMS |
| | POSSIBLY WITH ZONE 4 AND DIFFERENTLY ZONE 5. PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY THESE ZONES. |
| | SHEET A-2.2 THE WINDOWS NEXT TO THE FRONT ENTRY |
| | INDICATES ACTUAL CURVED GLAZING, WILL THIS WINDOW BE |
| | ACTUALLY CURVED? IF SO PROVIDE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | WITH TESTING. |
| | B) MULLIONS- MAY OR MAY NOT BE PART OF THE NOA, A |
| | SECOND ISSUE IS THE HEIGHT OF THE HORIZONTAL MULLIONS |
| | ON SHEETS A-5.1 AND A-5.2 IN EITHER CASE ONE OF THE |
| | WINDOWS ARE |
| | ILLUSTRATED WRONG EFFECTING THE SQ FT AREA OF THE |
| | GLAZING. |
| | THIS SAME AREA OR WINDOWA VERTICAL MULLION APPEARS TO |
| | BE MISSING. |
| | C) GLAZED SWING DOORS (EXTERIOR) YKK SERIES 20D NARROW |
| | STILENOA 03-0801.05 |
| | THE NOA SUBMITTED HAS NO IMPACT TESTING, THIS DOOR IS |
| | LOCATED IN AN END ZONE (5) , PRESSURES ARE LOW ALSO |
| | TESTED UNDER THE 1994 CODE. ,THIS REPORT IS A 1994 TEST |
| | REPORT AND THE FASTENERS TOOK 1 1/3 STEEL INCREASES NOT |
| | ALLOWED BYTHE 2004 FBC. REQUIRES REVIEW BY A FLORIDA |
| | PE OR TAKE THE DESIGN PRESSURES LISTED IN THE NOA AND |
| | DIVIDE BY 1.33 TO COMPLY WITH THE 2004 FBC. SUBMIT ONLY |
| | (2) SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT HAVE LARGE MISSILE |
| | TESTING. AND MEET THE END ZONE PRESSURES. |
| | D) EXTERIOR METAL SWING DOORSPRESSURES ARE GOOD FOR |
| | ZONE 4 ONLY, PLEASE SUBMIT ONLY 2 SETS OFPRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | E) PRE ENGINEERED A/C STANDS PRESSURES ARE GOOD SUBMIT |
| | ONLY 2 SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | F) EFIS SYSTEMS PLEASE SUBMIT ONLY 2 PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS, HIGHLIGHT WHICH SUBSYSTEM TO BE USED. VERIFY |
| | PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | 8) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 9) 2ND REQUEST WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. THE RESPONSEINDICATES THE |
| | NOA?S WERE SIGNED THEY NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | 10) 2ND REQUEST,SHEET G-SP2HEADING 815-C |
| | INSTALLATIONINDICATES A WIND PRESSURE OF 26PSF PLEASE |
| | SEE TABLE 1609.6.2.1(1)ALSO SEE MULTIPLIERS THE |
| | SHOPPING CENTER AND PARKING GARAGE ARE CONSIDERED ONE 5 |
| | STORY BUILDING!!!! SEE TABLE 1609.6.2.1(4) FOR |
| | MULTIPLIERS., |
| | PRESSURES SHOULD BE HIGHER AS ON SHEET S3.1. |
| | |
| | 11-12) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 13) SEMI-COMPLIED, THE OLD VOID SHEETS HAVEN?T BEEN |
| | REMOVED AS REQUESTED |
| | UNDER COMMENT # 1. |
| | |
| | 14) 2ND REQUEST DEALS WITH PROVIDING INFORMATION ON THE |
| | FREEZER AND WALK-IN COOLERS, RESPONSE INDICATES SHOP |
| | DRAWINGS WERE SUBMITTED, NOT IN THIS SUBMITTAL: |
| | 2603.4.1.2 COOLER AND FREEZER WALLS. |
| | FOAM PLASTIC INSTALLED IN A MAXIMUM THICKNESS OF 10 |
| | INCHES (254 MM) IN COOLER AND FREEZER WALLS SHALL: 1. |
| | HAVE A FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF 25 OR LESS AND A |
| | SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 450, WHERE |
| | TESTED IN A MINIMUM 4 INCH (102 MM) THICKNESS. |
| | 2.HAVE FLASH IGNITION AND SELF-IGNITION |
| | TEMPERATURES OF NOT LESS THAN 600?F AND 800?F (316?C |
| | AND 427?C), RESPECTIVELY. |
| | 3.HAVE A COVERING OF NOT LESS THAN 0.032-INCH (0.8 |
| | MM) ALUMINUM OR CORROSION-RESISTANT STEEL HAVING A BASE |
| | METAL THICKNESS NOT LESS THAN 0.0160 INCH (0.4 MM) AT |
| | ANY POINT. |
| | 4.BE PROTECTED BY AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM. |
| | WHERE THE COOLER OR FREEZER IS WITHIN A BUILDING, BOTH |
| | THE COOLER OR FREEZER AND THAT PART OF THE BUILDING IN |
| | WHICH IT IS LOCATED SHALL BE SPRINKLED. |
| | |
| | 2603.4.1.3 WALK-IN COOLERS. |
| | IN NON-SPRINKLED BUILDINGS, FOAM PLASTIC HAVING A |
| | THICKNESS THAT DOES NOT EXCEED 4 INCHES (102 MM) AND A |
| | MAXIMUM FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF 75 IS PERMITTED IN |
| | WALK-IN COOLERS OR FREEZER UNITS WHERE THE AGGREGATE |
| | FLOOR AREA DOES NOT EXCEED 400 SQUARE FEET (37 M 2 ) |
| | AND THE FOAM PLASTIC IS COVERED BY A METAL FACING NOT |
| | LESS THAN 0.032-INCH-THICK (0.81 MM) ALUMINUM OR |
| | CORROSION-RESISTANT STEEL HAVING A MINIMUM BASE METAL |
| | THICKNESS OF 0.016 INCH (0.41 MM). A THICKNESS OF UP TO |
| | 10 INCHES (254 MM) IS PERMITTED WHERE PROTECTED BY A |
| | THERMAL BARRIER. |
| | |
| | 15) SEMI-COMPLIED. PLEASE ONLY SUBMIT (2) SETS OF FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER PLANS FOR THIS REVIEW. THE FIRE SPRINKLER |
| | CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO SUPPLY(2) MORE SETS FOR THEIR |
| | OWN FIRE SPRINKLER PERMITTO BE FILED AT A LATER DATE. |
| | THE OTHER ISSUE IS UNTIL THE HEIGHT OF THE COOLERS AND |
| | FREEZERS ARE KNOWN THE UNKNOWN IS THE FIRE SPRINKLERS |
| | TO BE LOCATED IN THE COOLERS! |
| | |
| | 16) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 17) SEMI-COMPLIED, PLEASE REMOVE OLD SHEETS AS PER |
| | COMMENT # 1. |
| | |
| | 18-20) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | PLAN EXAMINER II BUILDING |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
