| Date |
Text |
| 2007-08-12 12:20:35 | |
| | ** DENIED 3RD TIME ** |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THAT SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE |
| | STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LETTERS NOW SUBMITTED FOR |
| | SIGNATURE VERIFICATION NOT DATED AND SEALED WHEN |
| | SIGNED. IF THIS WAS THE ONLY ITEM, THESE COULD BE |
| | MAILED IN TO THIS OFFICE HOWEVER AS THE PLANS HAVE |
| | OTHER COMMENTS PLEASE SUBMIT. |
| | FS 481.221, 471.025 |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2004 FBC |
| | CHAPTER 13 IS STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING REFLECT CEILING PLAN ON SHEET |
| | A1.4 DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH THE ELECTRICAL LIGHTING |
| | PLANS? |
| | PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED WERE ONCE |
| | AGAIN NOT SEALED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AS STATED |
| | ON THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS. THIS WAS SPECIFICALLY |
| | MENTIONED ON THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS AS THIS IS |
| | REQUIRED PER THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND FLORIDA |
| | STATUTES. THESE WERE SIGNED BUT WERE NOT SEALED AND |
| | DATED. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE *OWNER AGENT* IS ALSO NOT SIGNED ON |
| | SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS NOTE WHICH REQUIRES THE |
| | DESIGNER(S) OF RECORD RESPONSIBLE FOR SCOPE OF WORK TO |
| | *SIGN, DATE AND SEAL* SAID DOCUMENTS. THIS IS NOT ONLY |
| | REQUIRED PER FS 471.025, 481.221, FAC 61G15-23, 61G1-16 |
| | BUT ALSO FBC 13-103.1.1.1. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURES AND WATTAGES AS SHOWN ON ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE SUBMITTED PLANS |
| | AND FIXTURE LEGEND(S). |
| | PLEASE SEE THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS WHICH WERE MARKED |
| | WITH AN ASTERISK ** FOR 13-415.2.ABC.1.2 SPECIFICALLY |
| | FOR TRACK LIGHTING, HOWEVER THE WATTAGE ON THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE ADJUSTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT THE WATTAGE USED MUST BE THE WATTAGE OF |
| | THE TRACK LIGHTING HEADS WITH A *MINIMUM* OF 30VA PER |
| | FT. THIS MEANS WHICH EVER FIGURE IS HIGHER BASED ON THE |
| | MINIMUM OF THE TWO. |
| | EXAMPLE: |
| | IF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TRACK FIXTURES WERE 100 AND EACH |
| | WAS 75WATTS EACH THIS WOULD BE 7500VA. |
| | IF THE TOTAL LENGTH OF THE TRACK WAS 300FT AND THE |
| | MINIMUM PER FOOT OF TRACK AS STATED FROM THE FBC WAS |
| | 30VA PER FT, THEN THE TOTAL OF 9000VA WOULD BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE TOTAL LENGTH OFTRACK PER LINEAR |
| | FEET ON PLANS WITH THE 30VA MINIMUM PER FOOT EXCEEDS |
| | THE TOTAL WATTAGE OF THE TRACK HEADS BEING USED IN THE |
| | CALCULATIONS.(PLEASE ADJUST). |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS STATED |
| | THAT *NO**EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR* IS PERMITTED |
| | BEFORE THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT YET THE RISER |
| | STILL INDICATES THIS CONDUCTOR ON THE LINE SIDE OF THE |
| | SERVICE MAIN. |
| | PLEASE SEE 250.6 AND 250.24B. PLEASE KNOW IF THIS |
| | CONDUCTOR IS INSTALLED ON THE LINE SIDE OF THE MAIN AND |
| | THE MAIN THE GROUNDED CONDUCTOR IS BONDED AS REQUIRED |
| | PER 250.24B, THEN THIS WOULD CREATE A PARALLEL PATH |
| | WITH THE NEUTRAL(GROUNDED) CONDUCTOR AND THEREFORE |
| | CREATING *OBJECTIONABLE CURRENTS* AS STATED IN 250.6 OF |
| | THE NEC. |
| | PLEASE REMOVE. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA STATUTES 553.80(2)(B) WITH |
| | RESPECT TO DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND REPEAT CODE |
| | COMPLIANT COMMENTS. AS THE PLANS WERE SUBMITTED FOR |
| | ONLY *PLAN REVIEW* THE FIRST TIME, THIS IS NOT ASSESSED |
| | AT THIS TIME. PLEASE KNOW IF THE PLANS ARE RESUBMITTED |
| | WITH OUT THE ABOVE NOTES #2 AND #3 BEING ADDRESSED THIS |
| | OFFICE WILL BE REQUIRED PER THE ABOVE FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | TO ASSESS THE FOUR TIMES PLAN REVIEW FEE FOR THE |
| | PORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLAN REVIEW. |
| | THIS ISTO THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. |
| | THIS FEE WOULD NOT BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER |
| | OR CONTRACTOR. |
| | THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE AT THIS TIME. |
| | PLEASE ALSO KNOW ONE SET OF ELECTRICAL PLANS AND ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS ARE BEING RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE AT THIS |
| | TIME. |
| | |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
