| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-23 16:05:02 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. BUILDING REVIEW REVISION |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW UNDER FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2004 AND FBC 2004 |
| | WITH 2006 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1- CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING THIS SET OF DRAWINGS SHOWING |
| | DIFFERENT ASSEMBLIES SINCE MOST OF THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERMIT APPROVAL. |
| | THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THAT MOST OF THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS LISTED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS DON'T MATCH |
| | THOSE ALREADY APPROVED WITH THE PERMIT PACKAGE.IF |
| | APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE GOING TO BE REVISED, |
| | THEN PROVIDE COPIES OF NEW PRODUCT APPROVALS. ARCHITECT |
| | OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THEM IN WRITING (NOT |
| | SIGNING AND SEALING) PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SLIDING GLASS DOORS AS |
| | SHOWN ON PLANS AND SET OF DRAWINGS SUBMITTED.PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL IS NOT IN THE CITY FILE. |
| | |
| | 3- IF SUBMITTED SET OF DRAWINGS IS TO OBTAIN LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL, THEN, PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING |
| | PACKAGE FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEW BY ROBERT |
| | BROWN, PLAN REVIEWERS MANAGER. (561)805-6652. |
| | |
| | 4- THERE IS NO NEED TO SUBMIT TRUSS DRAWINGS FOR |
| | REVIEW, UNLESS THERE ARE REVISIONS TO ORIGINAL SET OF |
| | TRUSSES. TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED SHOWS THE SAME DATE AS |
| | THE TRUSS PACKAGE THAT WAS FILED BY THE BUILDING |
| | INSPECTOR. THEREFORE, NOT ADDITIONAL REVIEWS ARE |
| | REQUIRED.TRUSS DRAWINGS ARE CHECKED IN THE FIELDBY |
| | THE BUILDING INSPECTOR WHEN DOING FRAMING INSPECTIONS. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
