| Date |
Text |
| 2007-03-15 14:51:34 | DENIED |
| | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 FUEL GAS |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/CLARIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED |
| | FOR GAS PLAN REVIEW ON THE RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | 1. A GAS PERMIT CAN NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE ZONING |
| | ISSUES HAVE BEEN RESOLVED DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE GENERATOR AND PROPANE TANK MIGHT |
| | CHANGE. |
| | |
| | 2. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT SETS OF GAS |
| | DRAWINGS THAT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. ONE SET IS BY THE |
| | CONTRACTOR SIGNED ONTHE GAS PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | (FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES) WITH A COMPLETE DRAWING OF |
| | THE GAS SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED INCLUDING THE 500 GAL. |
| | U/G LP TANK, GENERATOR, FUTURE POOL HEATER, WATER |
| | HEATER, RANGE, GRILL, AND FIREPLACE. THE OTHER SET IS |
| | FROM MAKO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. FL. CA 26916 |
| | AND SIGNED AND SEALED BY JAMES L. MAKO FL.PE 54111 WITH |
| | GAS TO THE GENERATOR FROM THE LP TANK. IT IS SUGGESTED |
| | TO DELETE THE GAS INFORMATION ON THE ENGINEERED |
| | DRAWINGS ON THE RESUBMITTAL DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE |
| | CONTRACTORS DRAWINGS INDICATE THE COMPLETE GAS SYSTEM |
| | OF THE RESIDENCE. |
| | |
| | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE GENERATOR MANUFACTURER'S |
| | SPECIFICATIONS INDICATING RECOMMENDED SETBACKS TO |
| | STRUCTURES. |
| | |
| | 4. THE VALUE ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS WAY TO LOW. |
| | VALUE ON THE APPLICATION MUST INCLUDE EVERYTHING ON |
| | ELECTRICAL COMMENT NUMBER ONE PLUS ALL OF THE GAS |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION MATERIALS, LABOR,AND DESIGN. |
| | |
| | END OF COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON |
| | (561) 805-6730 |
| | FAX (561) 805-6731 |
| | E-MAIL [email protected] |
| | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS |
| | (561) 805-6721 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
