Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 07020610
Permit Number 07020610
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2007-09-08 16:47:382007-09-08 16:47:38
  
 ** DENIED 3RD REVIEW **
  
 ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL
 IN NEED OF ADDRESSING.
 ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE THE SAME AS PREVIOUS
 REVIEW AS THE SAME PLANS WERE SUBMITTED BACK FOR
 REVIEW.
 A RESPONSE LETTER WAS SUBMITTED WHICH MENTIONS MANY OF
 THESE ITEMS WERE DONE HOWEVER AS THE SAME PLANS WERE
 SUBMITTED THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE.
  
 1) NOTE: RESPONSE TO NOTE #1 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW
 MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED SHEET A-1, HOWEVER AS THE SAME
 PLANS WERE SUBMITTED THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE. NOTE
 REMAINS.
  
 2) NOTE: RESPONSE MENTIONS THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE
 REVISED. THIS IS INDEED CORRECT HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS SUBMITTED STILL NEED TO
 COORDINATE ALL FIXTURE/LUMINARIES ON PLANS WITH THE
 INPUT DATA REPORT. THE SHEETS ARE SIGNED AND SEALED SO
 THE PART OF THE PREVIOUS NOTE #2 WHICH REQUESTS THE
 SHEETS TO BE SIGNED DATED AND SEALED DOES NOT APPLY.
 PLEASE BE SURE WHEN RESUBMITTED THESE THAT THE SAME IS
 DONE.
 13-415.1.A, 13-415.2
  
 3) NOTE: RESPONSE TO NOTE #3 MENTIONS THE CLOSET WAS
 CHANGED TO AN ELECTRICAL ROOM, BUT THIS WAS NOT DONE ON
 PLANS. NOTE REMAINS.
  
 4) NOTE: RESPONSE TO NOTE #4 OK. THE ADDRESS WAS
 CONFIRMED WITH THE ADDRESSING REVIEWER.
  
 5) NOTE: RESPONSE TO NOTE #5 MENTIONS NORMAL AND
 EMERGENCY LEVELS WERE SHOWN ON SHEET A-1 AND SHEET
 A-1.1 HOWEVER THIS WAS NOT DONE. ONLY LEVELS ON A-1 OF
 SOME KIND WERE SHOWN. NO PHOTO-METRICS WERE SHOWN ON
 A-1.1.
 NO REVISED ELECTRICAL SHEETS SO, THE NOTE REMAINS.
  
 6) NOTE: RESPONSE TO NOTE #6 MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED
 RISER AND THE BREAKER WAS REDUCED. PLEASE KNOW BASED ON
 THE RESPONSE LETTER WHICH MENTIONS 80AMP OVER CURRENT
 PROTECTION THIS WOULD STILL BE TOO HIGH WITH THE FEEDER
 SIZE AS SHOWN ON RISER.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE 450.3 AS THE OCP IS STILL TOO HIGH.
 (MAX 125%).
 THE GROUND DETAIL WAS NOT SUBMITTED. (MAY NOT QUOTE THE
 CODE)
 THE LOAD CALCULATIONS WERE NOT REVISED.
  
  
 7) NOTE: RESPONSE TO NOTE #7 MENTIONS EQUIPMENT IS
 INDICATED ON PLANS HOWEVER THIS WAS NOT DONE. RESPONSE
 ALSO MENTIONS TO SEE SHEET E-3 HOWEVER NOT SHEET E-3
 WAS SUBMITTED OR IN EITHER OF THE THREE SETS
 SUBMITTED.
  
 8) NOTE: RESPONSE TO NOTE #8 MENTIONS THIS WAS
 ADDRESSED IN A NOTE #1 ON E-1, HOWEVER NOTE #1 DOES NOT
 MENTION AND INDICATE ANY MINIMUM LEVELS FOR ADA
 DEVICES.
  
 9) NOTE: RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS NOTE #9 WAS *NOTED*.
 PLEASE KNOW AS THESE COMMENTS HAVE NOW BEEN REPEATED
 FOR THE SAME COMMENTS A FEE AS REQUIRED PER FS
 553.80(2)(B) HAS NOW BEEN ASSESSED.
 THIS FEE IS DUE BEFORE PLANS ARE RESUBMITTED FOR THE
 FOLLOWING REVIEW.
 PLEASE ALSO KNOW ONE COPY OF EACH SET OF ELECTRICAL
 PLANS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOW BEING RETAINED BY
 THIS OFFICE.
 THIS FEE OF $2700.00 IS DUE BEFORE PLANS MAY BE
 RESUBMITTED FOR THE NEXT REVIEW. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THE COMMENTS AS TYPED TO
 PLEASE CALL TO GO OVER NOTES. THIS WAS STATED ON BOTH
 OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS.
 PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW WHICH WERE TRANSFERRED FROM
 PREVIOUS REVIEW.
 AS NOTED ABOVE SOME OF THESE ITEMS ARE NOW OK, HOWEVER
 MOST STILL NEED ADDRESSING.
  
 ** AS STATED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, IF THERE ARE
 COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS WHICH CAN BE GONE OVER ON THE
 PHONE, PLEASE CALL.
 THIS WOULD ALLEVIATE THE BACK AND FORTH ON PLANS ON ANY
 ITEMS NOT CLEAR AND PERHAPS NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED
 IN ANY MANOR.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
 ********** THESE NOTES FROM BELOW ARE EXACTLY AS STATED
 ON PREVIOUS REVIEW ***
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW WHICH ARE IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH NEW
 COMMENTS BASED ON REVISIONS AND CHANGES TO THE PLANS.
 PLEASE SEE NEW COMMENTS ALSO BASED ON INFORMATION NOW
 SHOWN WHICH WAS NOT ON PREVIOUS PLANS.
  
  
  
 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE ARCHITECTURAL COVER SHEET
 WHICH CONTAINS A 2005 NFPA-72, WHICH SHOULD BE 2002.
 THIS COULD BE REDLINED HOWEVER AS THIS SHEET WILL
 REQUIRE REVISIONS FOR OTHER COMMENTS THIS SHOULD BE
 ADJUSTED AT THIS TIME.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THIS NOTE REMAINS THE SAME FROM
 PREVIOUS REVIEW.
 PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS DO NOT CORRELATE
 WITH THE PLANS.
 PLEASE SEE THE INFORMATION ON THE INPUT DATA REPORT FOR
 THE TYPE OF LUMINARIES, THE NUMBER OF LUMINARIES, AND
 THE WATTAGE AS SHOWN ON LUMINARIES.
 PLEASE SEE THESE DO NOT CORRELATE AT THIS TIME. PLEASE
 SEE THE FIXTURE SCHEDULE NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED WITH
 FIXTURE INFORMATION. THESE CAN ALWAYS BE REVISED AT A
 LATER DATE.
 PLEASE SEE THE SIGNATURE, DATE AND RAISED SEAL IS
 REQUIRED ON CERTIFICATION SHEETS. 13-103.1.1.1 PLEASE
 SEE ONLY THE SIGNATURE AND DATE ARE PRESENT.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS DO NOT CORRELATE
 WITH THE PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING, WATTAGE,
 NUMBER OF FIXTURES ETC.
 PLEASE BE SURE THE FIXTURE LEGEND STATES THE TYPE OF
 FIXTURE SPECIFIED AND COORDINATE THIS WITH THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS.
 THESE DO NOT CORRELATE AT ALL AT THIS TIME.
 PLEASE SEE MAXIMUM LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES WHICH HAS
 NOT BEEN STATED ON PLANS, OR CORRELATE IN ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS.
 PLEASE BE SURE THESES CONTAIN A RAISED SEAL, DATE AND
 SIGNATURE OF THE DESIGNER OF RECORD ON SHEET(S) WHICH
 CONTAIN THE TITLE BLOCKS FOR THE DESIGNER OF RECORD.
 THE SHEET CONTAINS THE LOCATION OF THE PRINTED NAME FOR
 THE DESIGNER HOWEVER THIS SHEET WAS NOT SIGNED, DATED
 OR SEALED.
 PLEASE BE SURE ONCE THE METHOD OF CONTROLS IS FIGURED
 FOR THE PLANS TO BE SURE TO CORRELATE CONTROL METHODS
 ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS.
 PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 W/ 2006 REVISIONS. 13-103.1.1.1,
 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3, 13-415.1.AB.1.1,
 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.2 (3) FOR TRACK LIGHTING.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LOCATION OF THE ELECTRICAL
 PANEL IS NOT PERMITTED IN CLOSET.110.26, 408.7, 240.24
 ETC
 PLEASE SEE COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE NEW RISER AS
 OTHER ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IS NOT SHOWN.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE THE ELECTRICAL PLANS DO NOT INDICATE A
 SCALE IN WHICH PLANS ARE UNDER, HOWEVER IT IS BEING
 ASSUMED THAT THE SCALE IS THAT OF THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS AT 3/16THS.
 PLEASE SEE THE LOCATION AND MINIMUM CLEARANCES FOR THE
 ELECTRICAL PANEL *A* DO NOT SEEM TO MEET 110.26. PLEASE
 ALSO SEE 408.7 AND 240.24 FOR LOCATION OF EASILY
 IGNITABLE MATERIALS AND CLOSE PROXIMITY OF COMBUSTIBLES
 WITH OVER CURRENT PROTECTION DEVICES.
 PLEASE ADJUST PLANS.
  
 4) NOTE:PLEASE KNOW THE SUITE/UNIT # MAY BE ADJUSTED
 BY THE ADDRESSING REVIEWER. ON SHEETS WHICH DO NOT
 REQUIRE REVISIONS THE ADDRESS FOR SUITE/UNIT NUMBER MAY
 BE CHANGED BY HAND.
 THIS COMMENT WILL REMAIN AS THE INFORMATION FOR THIS
 HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO ADDRESSING.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE ADDRESS ON THE PLANS FOR THE
 LOCATION OF THE SCOPE OF WORK. PLEASE ALSO KNOW THIS
 WILL BE SENT TO ADDRESSING FOR THE NEW SUITE NUMBER
 WHICH WILL BE ASSIGNED.
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PHOTO-METRICS ON SHEET A-1 DOES
 NOT INDICATE THE COMPLIANCE AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED. PLEASE
 SHOW LEVELS UNDER NORMAL AND UNDER EMERGENCY. AS THE
 LIGHTING PLANS DO NOT INDICATE THE EMERGENCY LIGHT
 FIXTURES NEEDED FOR THIS EGRESS PATH IT DOES NOT SEEM
 THE MINIMUM LEVELS CAN BE MET BASED ON THE PLANS
 SUBMITTED.
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE COMPLETED INFORMATION FOR REVIEW.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE**
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE PHOTO-METRIC LEVELS FOR STAIRS PER
 NFPA-101 2003 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS NOW INCLUDE A NEW
 ELECTRICAL RISER WHICH CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING
 COMMENTS.
 A) PLEASE SEE THE OCP FOR THE TRANSFORMER IS SET TOO
 HIGH PER 450.3.
 B) PLEASE SEE THE CONDUCTOR SIZES ARE NOT SUFFICIENT
 SIZE FOR THE 100AMP OCP AS SHOWN ON MAIN DISCONNECT.
 PLEASE SEE 6A ABOVE AS THE OCP WILL BE
 CHANGING.240.4,310.16,ETC.
 C) PLEASE SEE INDICATE THE GROUNDING ATTACHMENT FOR
 TRANSFORMER. 250.50,250.20,250.30 ETC.
 D) PLEASE SEE THE NEW LOAD CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE
 ADJUSTED TO COORDINATE WITH ALL ELECTRICAL AND
 DEDICATED LOADS ON PANEL SCHEDULE. THERE ARE SEVERAL
 DEDICATE CIRCUIT LOADS ON PANEL WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN IN
 LOAD CALCULATIONS. THESE MAY NOT BE PART OF THE GENERAL
 LIGHTING/RECEPTACLE LOADS.
 PLEASE SEE WATER HEATERS UNDER 422.13 WHICH IS REQUIRED
 AT 125% (NEW CODE CHANGE FOR 05). PLEASE SEE OTHER
 SECTIONS IN THE 2005 NEC 220.
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW LOCATION OF ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT
 INCLUDING THE NEW TRANSFORMER NOT SHOWN. PLEASE SEE
 110.26,408.7,240.24,450.9,450.13 ETC.
  
 8) NOTE:PLEASE SEE PLANS INDICATE THE DEVICES AS
 PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED AND IT IS KNOWN THAT THE FA
 DEVICES WILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT HOWEVER THE
 MINIMUM LEVELS FOR ADA COMPLIANCE NEEDS TO BE STATED ON
 PLANS. THIS CAN BE ON THE SYMBOL LEGEND.
 PLEASE SEE THE LEVELS AS REQUIRED IN CODE STATED IN
 PREVIOUS NOTES. QUOTING THE CODE IN LIEU OF SPECIFIC
 INFORMATION IS NOT PERMITTED.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE KNOW AS THIS BUILDING ISFULLY SPRINKLED AND
 CONTAINS A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM, PLEASE KNOW THE BASE
 PLANS SHALL INDICATE THE BASE PROTECTION EVEN THOUGH
 ANY FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM WORK WILL BE UNDER A
 SEPARATE PERMIT. FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.1.2 PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE MINIMUM LEVELS FOR ALL HORN AND STROBE
 DEVICES PER FBC 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3(4). THIS IS
 REQUIRED ON THE PLANS AT THIS TIME.
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO
 REPEAT COMMENTS. THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS
 TIME.
 ******************************************************
 * *****


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved