| Date |
Text |
| 2007-05-03 13:44:41 | DENIED 2ND TIME |
| | REFERENCE: |
| | ** FBC-2004 SECTIONS 424.2 OR R4101 SWIMMING POOLS. |
| | ** FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL |
| | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH SOME NEW COMMENTS, |
| | SOME BASED ON PLANS NOW SUBMITTED, NEW DOCUMENTS BEING |
| | REVIEWED FOR THE FIRST TIME AND SOME NEW COMMENTS NOT |
| | MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A NO, OK OR A NO/OK. |
| | THESE WILL BE FOR THE EXACT NUMERICAL NOTATION OF THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES. |
| | |
| | A NO IS IF THE COMMENT WAS NOT FULLY ADDRESSED AND/OR |
| | FURTHER EXPLANATION OR CHANGES IN PLANS OR DOCUMENTS |
| | ARE STILL NEEDED. THIS REVIEWER WILL TRY TO BETTER |
| | EXPLAIN NOTE ABOVE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT. |
| | |
| | AN OK WILL BE LABELED AS SUCH ON THE SAME NUMERICAL |
| | COMMENT AND WILL HAVE OLD NOTE REMOVED FROM COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | A NO/OK MEANS PART OF THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE ANY NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END OF |
| | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AND NOTED AS SUCH. |
| | |
| | 1. **NO/OK** PER FBC-2004, CHAPTER 1, SECTION |
| | 106.1.3, QUALITY OF BUILDING PLANS: THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH THROUGH DEPARTMENTAL |
| | POLICY, STANDARDS FOR PLANS |
| | AND SPECIFICATIONS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE |
| | CONFORMITY TO ITS RECORD RETENTION |
| | PROGRAM. THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH |
| | THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE, SHAPE, CONTRAST, |
| | CLARITY, OR OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO |
| | RECORDS MANAGEMENT. |
| | NOTE: THE RESUBMITTED PLANS ARE STILL HARD TO READ. THE |
| | WORDING IS NOT LEGIBLE DUE TO THE INK RUNNING TOGETHER. |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT NEW SHEETS THAT ARE LEGIBLE. PLEASE |
| | REFERENCE ALL CIRCLED AREAS IN RED INK THAT ARE NOT |
| | LEGIBLE AND PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. |
| | |
| | 2. **NO** PER R4101.6.6.4 THE HAND WRITTEN CHANGES |
| | MADE FOR THE TWO SUCTION INLETS ON THE PIPING DIAGRAM |
| | ARE WRONG. THE HAND WRITTEN CHANGES ARE INDICATING A |
| | THREE FEET CENTER TO CENTER SEPERATION OF THE MAIN |
| | DRAINS, WHICH IS WRONG. THE CORRECT INDICATION SHOULD |
| | BE THAT THE TWO SUCTION INLETS PER PUMP SHOULD BE |
| | SEPERATED A MINIMUM OF THREE FEET. PLEASE CORRECT AND |
| | RESUBMIT. |
| | |
| | 3. **OK** |
| | |
| | 4. **OK** |
| | |
| | 5. **OK** |
| | |
| | 6. **OK** |
| | |
| | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** |
| | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, |
| | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS |
| | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A |
| | TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH |
| | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY |
| | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE |
| | ONLY. |
| | NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING |
| | IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR |
| | RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | END OF COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON |
| | (561) 805-6730 |
| | FAX (561) 805-6731 |
| | E-MAIL [email protected] |
| | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS |
| | (561) 805-6721 |
