| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-19 14:11:40 | NEW COMMENT |
| | |
| | 1.PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SURVEY AND THE SITE PLAN SHALL |
| | SHOW SAME CONDITIONS.WIDTH AND DEPTH DIMENSIONS OF |
| | THE PROPOSED ADDITION ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND SITE PLAN, |
| | SHALL MATCH THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. |
| 2007-07-12 16:29:48 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| | |
| | ***FAILED*** |
| | |
| | 1. PROVIDE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. |
| | |
| | 2. SETBACK DIMENSIONS OF THE EXISTING SHED ON THE |
| | SURVEY AND SITE PLAN DO NOT MATCH.SURVEY AND SITE |
| | PLAN SHALL REFLECT ACTUAL CONDITIONS (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | A. ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY, THE EXISTING SHED IS 9 FEET |
| | FROM THE METAL FENCE, AND NOT FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | SIDE SETBACK DIMENSION SHALL BE REVISED ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN. |
| | B. ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY, THE EXISTING SHED IS 13.9 |
| | FEET FROM THE CONCRETE WALL AND NOT FROM THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE.REAR SETBACK DIMENSION SHALL BE REVISED ON THE |
| | SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3. PROVIDE REAR SETBACK DIMENSION FROM THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE TO THE EXISTING SHED ON THE SITE PLAN (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT). |
| | A. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SURVEY SHOWS REAR SETBACK |
| | DIMENSION FROM THE SHED TO THE CONCRETE WALL AND NOT |
| | THE PROPERTY LINE (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | |
| | 4. ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY, THE PROPOSED ADDITION HAS A |
| | REAR SETBACK OF 29.4 FEET; HOWEVER, ACCORDING TO THE |
| | SITE PLAN THE PROPOSED ADDITION HAS A REAR SETBACK OF |
| | 34.6 FEET (29.4 + 5.2).REAR SETBACK DIMENSION OF THE |
| | PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL BE REVISED ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 5. PROVIDE BUILDING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS ON SHEET 3 FROM |
| | GRADE TO THE MID POINT BETWEEN THE RIDGE AND THE EVE OF |
| | THE PROPOSED ROOF (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | |
| | 6. PROVIDE BUILDING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS ON SHEET 3 FROM |
| | GRADE TO THE TOP OF THE ROOF RIDGE. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC |
| | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
