| Date |
Text |
| 2007-06-11 16:49:23 | BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- BRING DRAWINGS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD. |
| | (561)233-5115)TO VERIFY IF IMPACT FEES ARE DUE OR |
| | NOT.BRING BACKSTAMPED PLANS BY PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. |
| | |
| | 2- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. SEE ATTACHED |
| | LEGAL FORM. |
| | |
| | 3- SOIL TEST REPORT NEEDS TO HAVE ENGINEERING FIRM |
| | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AS REQUIRED BY |
| | CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE AND SEC. 61G15-23.002 |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET 2: |
| | A) SPECIFY ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS, INCLUDING ATTIC |
| | LIVE LOADS,AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R301 AND TABLE R301.5 |
| | OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE (WITH 2006 |
| | REVISIONS). |
| | ***CLARIFY WHY DEAD LOADS SPECIFIIED ON ROOF FRAMING |
| | PLAN ARE LARGER THAN THE LIVE LOADS. PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO SHOW WHY THIS DESIGN CRITERIA |
| | WAS USED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE IS CONFUSING.IS NOT CLEAR |
| | WHICH ARE CONNECTORS'A'AND WHICH ARE CONNECTORS |
| | 'B'.THEY ARE SHOWN ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE, BUT |
| | CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON THE PRODUCT CODE COLUMN DON'T |
| | SHOW ANY RELATION TO CONNECTOR 'A' OR 'B'. |
| | REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1L.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | C)NUMBER OF FASTENERSAND LOADS SHOWN ON TRUSS |
| | ANCHOR SCHEDULE DON'T MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR THIS TYPE OF CONNECTORS. |
| | SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. OTHERWISE, |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS FOR NUMBER OF |
| | FASTENERS AND LOADS THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND |
| | PUBLISHED BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | D) HANDWRITTEN INFORMATION SHOWN ON VALLEY TRUSSES |
| | IS NOT CLEAR.SPECS : "TS12/W 7-8D TO THE THE TRUSS |
| | AND 7-8D TO EXISTINGEACH END END TYP" IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE CLEAR DETAIL. AND, |
| | HANDWRITTEN INFORMATION ON PLANS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. |
| | REVISE INFORMATION ON ORIGINAL CAD DRAWING. |
| | |
| | E) REVISE PLYWOOD SHEATHING NAILING SCHEDULE. NEED |
| | MIN. 8D RING SHANK NAILS IN ALL ZONES. SEE SEC. |
| | R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | F)INFORMATION ON ITEM 4(E)NEED TO MATCH |
| | INFORMATION ONTYPICAL WALL SEC.REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | G) INFORMATION FOR GABLE ENDS AND WOOD FRAME WALLS |
| | IS NOT CLEAR.CLARIFY ASREQUIRED OR OMIT TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS SINCE PROPOSED ROOF DOESN'T HAVE GABLE ENDS. |
| | |
| | H) SPECIFY CONNECTORSFOR WOOD TRUSSES RESTING ON |
| | EXISTING BEARING WALL.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) ASPHALT SHINGLES. NOA 02-1209.10 SUBMITTED IS |
| | CLOSED BY DADE COUNTY. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 6- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BYSEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 7- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A) EXTERIORINSULATION VALUEDOESN'T MATCH |
| | INFORMATION ON PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) SEE SURVEY FOR CORRECT HOUSE ORIENTATION AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) NUMBER OF AND SIZE OF WINDOWS DON'TMATCH PLANS. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINE(561)805-6712 |
