| Date |
Text |
| 2007-04-02 09:05:16 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 2.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 3.)IN SEVERAL PLACES, THE PLAN STATES "AS PER FBC |
| | 2004 1009".DETAILS ARE TO BE SPECIFIC FBC*106.1.1. |
| | |
| | DETAILS ARE NOW PROVIDED BUT ARE NOT CODE COMPLIANT; |
| | SEE OTHER COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4.)PROVIDE A PERMIT NUMBER FOR WHAT YOU CALL |
| | "EXISTING STAIRS" ON THE PLAN.THE DIMENSIONS ARE TO |
| | COMPLY WITH FBC1009.ON THE PLAN, EVERY RISER IS SHOWN |
| | AT A DIFFERENT DIMENSION RANGING FROM 2" TO 6" ON ONE |
| | SIDE, 5" AND 7" ON THE OTHER SIDE, AND THE TREADS ARE |
| | SHOWN AT 2'11" AND 3'2".SEE FBC1009.3.IT APPEARS |
| | THAT THE "EXISTING STAIRS" WERE NOT BUILT IN COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE CURRENT BUILDING CODE AND PRESENT A HAZARD. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, A "STEPS REPAIR" WAS INCLUDED IN THE PLAN, |
| | AND NOW THERE ARE RISER HEIGHTS RANGING FROM 4.5" TO |
| | 6".PLEASE READ REFERENCED CODE SECTION AND REVISE. |
| | STAIRS MODIFIED AS PROPOSED ARE NOT CODE COMPLIANT AND |
| | STILL PRESENT A HAZARD. |
| | |
| | 5.)DECLARE GOVERNING CODE, INCLUDING 2006 AMENDMENTS, |
| | AND EXISTING BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 6.)IS THIS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY?OUR RECORDS SHOW |
| | AN AUTO BODY SHOP IN THIS LOCATION. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED.PROVIDING A SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE.OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONS ARE TO BE |
| | DECLARED AS IN FBC CHAPTER 3.THE SITE PLAN AND SURVEY |
| | SHOW TWO SEPARATE BUILDINGS 6' APART.IT IS NOT CLEAR |
| | IF AN OCCUPANCY WAS CHANGED WITHOUT SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH FBC6 AND FBC5.TWO TENANTS ARE SHOWN IN ONE |
| | BUILDING, BUT THIS DOES NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION IN |
| | REGARDS TO THE CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | 7.)THE GUARD IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC1012 AND FBC1607.7. |
| | SHOW COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE CALUCLATIONS; IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE WOOD 1X2 |
| | PICKETS WILL WITHSTAND LOADS FBC1607.7.1.2.THIS |
| | SECTION WAS NOT MENTIONED IN THE DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 8.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 9.)THE CONTRACTOR DECLARED A $350 VALUE.PROVIDE A |
| | REASONABLE VALUE OR A VALUATION ADJUSTMENT WILL BE DONE |
| | FOR YOU USING MARSHALL & SWIFT. |
| | |
| | CONTRACTOR HAS REVISED THE COST.THIS WILL BE |
| | EVALUATED AFTER THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK HAS BEEN |
| | DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 10.)HANDRAILS REQUIRED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STAIR, |
| | FBC1009.11.SHOW ALL DETAILS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | FBC11-4.9.4 AND FBC1009. |
| | |
| | NO HANDRAILS SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 11.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 12.)DIAZ DRAFTING SERVICES HAS ALREADY BEEN INFORMED |
| | BY THIS DEPARTMENT THAT THEY ARE NOT LICENSED TO DO |
| | DESIGN WORK FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.CONTINUED |
| | NONCOMPLIANCE WILL RESULT IN A COMPLAINT AGAINST THE |
| | COMPANY.DUE TO THIS ISSUE AND THE DEFICIENCIES IN THE |
| | PLAN, A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED. |
| | |
| | A SET OF THE PLANS IS TO BE SENT TO FBPE AS PREVIOUSLY |
| | ADVISED. |
| | |
| | 13.)THE NOTES STATE THAT THE BOTTOM RAIL SHALL REJECT |
| | THE PASSAGE OF A 2" OBJECT.HOWEVER, A 3" AND 5" GAP |
| | IS SHOWN BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE BALUSTERS AND THE |
| | "PLATFORM".DETAILS ARE TO BE CONSISTENT AND CODE |
| | COMPLIANT.SEE FBC1012. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 14.)RENAMING THE NONCOMPLIANT STAIRS TO "STEPS" DOES |
| | NOT ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR STAIRS.REGARDLESS |
| | OF WHAT YOU CALL THEM, THEY ARE STAIRS FBC1002 |
| | DEFININTIONS, AND ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC1009. |
| | |
| | 15.)INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER WITH THE RESUBMITTAL, |
| | PREPARED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | 16.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B). |
