| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-02 11:14:38 | DENIED 2ND TIME |
| | REFERENCE: |
| | ** FBC-2004 FUEL GAS. |
| | ** THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GAS PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | ** FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, THE CITY OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS. |
| | ** FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | ** FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL |
| | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH SOME NEW COMMENTS, |
| | SOME BASED ON PLANS NOW SUBMITTED, NEW DOCUMENTS BEING |
| | REVIEWED FOR THE FIRST TIME AND SOME NEW COMMENTS NOT |
| | MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A NO, OK OR A NO/OK. |
| | THESE WILL BE FOR THE EXACT NUMERICAL NOTATION OF THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES. |
| | |
| | A **NO** IS IF THE COMMENT WAS NOT FULLY ADDRESSED |
| | AND/OR FURTHER EXPLANATION OR CHANGES IN PLANS OR |
| | DOCUMENTS ARE STILL NEEDED. THIS REVIEWER WILL TRY TO |
| | BETTER EXPLAIN NOTE ABOVE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT. |
| | |
| | AN **OK** WILL BE LABELED AS SUCH ON THE SAME NUMERICAL |
| | COMMENT AND WILL HAVE OLD NOTE REMOVED FROM COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | A **NO/OK** MEANS PART OF THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE ANY NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END OF |
| | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AND NOTED AS SUCH. |
| | |
| | 1. **NO** VALUE OF GENERATOR IS TO LOW. |
| | PER FBC-2004, CHAPTER 1, SECTION |
| | 108.3, BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION: IF IN |
| | THE OPINION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, |
| | THE CLAIMED VALUATION OF THE BUILDING, |
| | ALTERATION, STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, GAS |
| | MECHANICAL OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS APPEARS |
| | TO BE UNDERESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, |
| | THE PERMIT SHALL BE DENIED. FOR |
| | PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF |
| | BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL |
| | REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, |
| | ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR |
| | FINISH, NORMAL SITE WORK (EXCAVATION AND |
| | BACKFILL FOR BUILDINGS), ARCHITECTURAL |
| | AND DESIGN FEES, MARKETING COSTS, |
| | OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY LAND |
| | VALUE. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE |
| | THE LATEST PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL |
| | CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES (MARSHALL-SWIFT, |
| | MEANS ECT.) WITH |
| | REGIONAL ADJUSTMENTS FOR LOCATION AS |
| | PUBLISHED BY INTERNATIONAL CODE |
| | CONGRESS. |
| | NOTE: PLEASE CORRECT THIS PRIOR TO THE RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 2. **NO/OK** PLEASE PROVIDE MANUFACTURER |
| | SPECIFICATIONS INDICATING RECOMMENDING SETBACKS OF |
| | GENERATOR TO STRUCTURES AND TO VERIFY BTU LOAD. |
| | NOTE: THE MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS REQUESTED FOR THE |
| | RESUBMITTAL INDICATING THE RECOMMENDED SETBACKS OF |
| | GENERATOR TO STRUCTURES WAS NOT PROVIDED. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION ON THE NEXT RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 3. **OK** |
| | |
| | 4. **OK** |
| | |
| | 5. **OK** |
| | |
| | ** THE FOLLOWING IS A NEW COMMENT ** |
| | |
| | 6. SHEET C-1: THE LONGEST RUN OF 31' ON THE RESUBMITTED |
| | GAS ISOMETRIC IS WRONG. THE CORRECT LONGEST RUN ON THE |
| | GAS SYSTEM IS 44' FROM THE NEWLY PROVIDED INFORMATION. |
| | PLEASE CORRECT THIS ON THE RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | ******IMORTANT INFORMATION |
| | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, |
| | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS |
| | WHICH HAVE CHANGED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY |
| | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE |
| | ONLY. |
| | NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING |
| | IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR |
| | RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | END OF COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON |
| | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6730 |
| | FAX (561) 805-6731 |
| | E-MAIL [email protected] |
| | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS |
| | (561) 805-6721 |
