| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-07 19:28:22 | 2007-07-07 19:28:22 |
| | *** NOTE ADDED ** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE THIS COMMENT IS FOR THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THESE SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE SEAL IN USE ON LANDSCAPE PLANS IS |
| | REQUIRED TO MEET FAC 61G1-16.002. THIS IS REQUIRED |
| | WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER. |
| | THIS IS A NEW COMMENT AND WAS NOTICE WHEN PLANS WERE |
| | BEING ROLLED. PLEASE SEE ZONING FOR POSSIBLE COMMENTS |
| | EITHER ON PREVIOUS OR PRESENT REVIEW. |
| 2007-07-07 19:08:06 | 2007-07-07 19:08:06 |
| | **** UNSAT3RDREVIEW **** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL SEVERAL ITEMS FROM THE |
| | TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SOME NEW COMMENTS BASED ON |
| | CHANGES AND REVISIONS NOW MADE TO PLANS WHICH WERE NOT |
| | ON PREVIOUS REVIEWED PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE BOTH PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED |
| | FOR THE REQUIRED CODES TO BE STATED ON BOTH THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE ONLY |
| | CHANGE WAS MADE TO THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS AND THE |
| | ELECTRICAL SHEETS STILL CONTAIN THE SAME GENERAL |
| | STATEMENT. |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT RELEVANT CODES UNDER A DESIGN OF ANY |
| | PROJECT SHALL BE STATED ON PLANS AS REQUIRED UNDER THE |
| | FBC. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE THE FOLLOWING IS STATED ON THE |
| | ELECTRICAL SHEETS: |
| | 2005 NFPA-70 (NEC |
| | 2003 NFPA-101 LIFE SAFETY CODE |
| | 2002 NFPA-72 |
| | 2004 FBC W/2006 REVISIONS. |
| | PLEASE STATE THESE CODE ON E COVER SHEETS OR ANY OTHER |
| | E-SHEET(S) WHERE NOTES ARE PRESENT REFLECTING THE CODE |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS TWO REVIEWS REQUESTED |
| | COMPLIANCE TO FBC CHAPTER 13. THERE WERE SUBSTANTIAL |
| | CHANGES WHICH WENT INTO EFFECT ON OCTOBER 1ST, 2005. |
| | PLEASE SEE NOT SYSTEM IS PROPOSED, ONLY PLANS NOW |
| | INDICATE A SYMBOL IN AREAS FOR *MOTION DETECTORS* |
| | PLEASE SEE NO TIMES OR INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR |
| | THESE NEW DEVICES AS NOTED PREVIOUSLY. NO DETAIL ON |
| | WIRING OF THESE DEVICES AS LIGHTING IS STILL SHOWN |
| | CIRCUITED BACK TO THE MAIN PANEL. |
| | PLEASE SEE NOT ALL AREAS SHOW MOTION DETECTORS OR |
| | OCCUPANCY DEVICES. PLEASE SPECIFY THESE DEVICES. PLEASE |
| | KNOW RANGES ON MOTION DEVICES ONLY ARE DIFFERENT AND |
| | MAY OR MAY NOT PROVIDE THE NEEDED COVERAGE. PLEASE SEE |
| | OTHER COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO STAIRS ON MOTION |
| | DETECTORS. |
| | PLEASE SEE SEPARATE SPACES WHICH REQUIRE DEVICES YET |
| | PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY DEVICES FOR THESE AREAS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE MAXIMUM TIMES STATED IN THE FBC |
| | DEPENDING ON THE TYPES OF DEVICES CHOSEN. (OS TYPES |
| | 30MINS)(TIMER TYPES 4HRS) THIS ALL DEPENDS ON DESIGN OF |
| | DEVICES ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE SAME ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED |
| | BACK. PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE MENTIONS HAVE BEEN |
| | PROPERLY SUBMITTED, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE NO INFORMATION |
| | PER 13-415.2 COULD BE FOUND ON PLANS AND OTHER |
| | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURES AS SHOWN |
| | ON PLANS DO NOT ALL CORRELATE WITH THE FIXTURE LEGEND |
| | AND NO PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED BASED ON |
| | THE FIXTURES ON PLANS AND SQ FT OF PROJECT ON HOW THE |
| | NUMBER OF 1.0 W/SF IS MET. |
| | THE DESIGN TOTAL COMPARED TO THE DESIGN ALLOWANCE BASED |
| | ON THE SECTION 13-415.2.C.1, 13-415.2.C. |
| | 13-415.2.ABC.1.3 |
| | PLEASE SEE AS THE SAME ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR METHOD C |
| | WAS SUBMITTED BACK; PLEASE SEE THESE ARE STILL NOT |
| | SEALED AS REQUIRED AND PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. PLEASE SEE |
| | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, 13-415.1.ABC.1.2, AND |
| | 13-415.1.ABC.1.3 (WHERE APPLICABLE ON .1.3).PLEASE SEE |
| | 13-103.1.1.1 WHICH REQUIRES THESE TO BE *SIGNED, DATED |
| | AND SEALED* BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD AND |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DOCUMENTS. |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED |
| | PHOTO-METRICS AND ANY CONTROLS TO MEET BOTH THE FBC AND |
| | NFPA-101 FOR DEVICES CHOSEN. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS NOW INDICATE ONLY ONE DEVICE ON |
| | EACH LEVEL FOR CONTROL OF EGRESS LIGHTING. PLEASE SEE |
| | 7.9.2.2 OF THE LIFE SAFETY CODE WHICH WAS GIVEN ON BOTH |
| | OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS. |
| | FBC 1006.1.2, LS101 7.8.1.2.2 |
| | PLEASE ADJUST. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FIRST REVIEW COMMENTS WHICH GAVE |
| | NOTES FOR REQUIRED DEDICATED CIRCUITS FOR ELEVATOR |
| | ROOMS, EQUIPMENT ETC. THE RESPONSE WAS THE EQUIPMENT |
| | ROOM WAS TO HAVE DEDICATED CIRCUITS ETC AND THIS WAS |
| | DONE. PLEASE SEE 620.24 HOWEVER AS THIS REQUIRES |
| | DEDICATE BRANCH CIRCUIT FOR PIT LIGHTS AND RECEPTACLES. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING IS STILL SHOWN ON THE SAME |
| | CIRCUIT AS THE LIGHTING ON FIRST FLOOR. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT SOME LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR |
| | SERVICE ARE NOW BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST TIME FOR |
| | REVIEW. PLEASE SEE NO LOAD SUMMARY ON HOW LOADS WERE |
| | DERIVED WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE CONTINUOUS LOADS AS REQUIRED ARE STILL NOT |
| | SHOWN AT 125%. |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT LOAD CALCULATIONS BASED ON FUTURE LOADS |
| | AND CURRENT KNOWN |
| | PLEASE SEE THE 2005 NEC FOR REQUIRED METHODS. 220.12, |
| | 220.14, 220.42, 220.44 AND ALL PREVIOUS SECTIONS AS |
| | PREVIOUSLY NOTED. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE THE *85%* AS SHOWN AS A DE-RATING |
| | FOR * EQUIPMENT* COMES FROM BASED ON THE NEC. PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT COMPLETE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE AND EACH |
| | OF THE PANELS AS BEING SHOWN EVEN THOSE BEING SET ASIDE |
| | FOR FUTURE USE. PLEASE SEE THE ONLY PANEL SHOWN WHICH |
| | IS THE NHP AND THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE A LOAD SUMMARY OR |
| | HOW THE SERVICE WAS SIZED OR CORRECT LOAD CALCULATIONS |
| | FOR THIS PANEL OR SERVICE. |
| | PLEASE SEE NOTE #9 ABOVE AS THE SERVICE SIZE OR |
| | CONDUCTORS ARE NOT COMPLETE THE SIZE OF THE SERVICE CAN |
| | NOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME. |
| | PLEASE SEE ALL OF 220. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE 215.3, 230.42 ETC FOR ALL CONTINUOUS |
| | LOADS AND LARGEST MOTORS LOADS AT 125%. |
| | FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER AS SUBMITTED IS STILL NOT |
| | COMPLETE. |
| | PLEASE SEE NO INFORMATION FOR ANY OF THE PROPOSED MAINS |
| | IS SHOWN. ONLY ONE OF THE MAINS INDICATES IT WILL BE |
| | 800AMPS. |
| | PLEASE SEE NO AIC RATINGS FOR EACH OF THE SERVICE |
| | EQUIPMENT AND MAIN WAS SUBMITTED. SOME AIC CALCULATIONS |
| | THESE WAS SUBMITTED. 110.9 |
| | PLEASE SEE NO MAINS AS REQUIRED PER 230.70, 230.71, |
| | 230.72, 230.76 AND 230.79 ETC WAS SHOWN. |
| | IN FACT PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE LETTER NOW MENTIONS |
| | SPECIFICALLY THAT A NEW SHUNT TRIP AND SHUNT TRIP |
| | BREAKERS WAS ADDED. THE RISER NOW SHOWS THIS AND AS |
| | PREVIOUSLY STATED IN BOTH PREVIOUS REVIEWS MAIN MUST |
| | MEET 230.76 AND 230.79. SHUNT TRIP BREAKERS AND SHUNT |
| | TRIPS DO NOT MEET CODE. PLEASE KNOW THAT ALL MAINS AND |
| | MEANS OF DISCONNECT MUST CONTAIN A MANUAL MEANS OF |
| | DISCONNECT RATED FOR THE LOAD SERVED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LOCATION OF THESE MAINS SHALL BE LOCATED |
| | AT THE NEAREST POINT OF ENTRANCE INTO THE BUILDING. |
| | THIS IS A LIFE SAFETY HAZARD AND PROPERTY HAZARD. IF |
| | THERE IS A STRUCTURE FIRE FOR EXAMPLE AND THE ONLY WAY |
| | TO SHUT OFF THE POWER TO THE BUILDING IS LOCATED CLOSE |
| | TO THE CENTER OF THE BUILDING THIS WOULD NOT ONLY CAUSE |
| | A DELAY IT WOULD ALSO CREATE A HAZARD TO FIRE |
| | DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL IN AN EFFORT TO TURN OFF POWER. |
| | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE NUMEROUS ITEMS NOT COMPLETED ON |
| | RISER AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | ** AS A NOTE PANEL NHP IS GOING TO BE 800AMPS? |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER STILL DOES NOT INDICATE |
| | THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM AS REQUIRED PER 250.50. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE RISER MENTIONS AND SHOWS ALL AS EXISTING |
| | HOWEVER THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE AS THE RISER JUST ABOVE |
| | WHICH SHOWS EXISTING CONDITIONS AND THIS DOES NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE NEW PROPOSED RISER. |
| | HOW CAN THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM AS SHOWN BE |
| | EXISTING WHEN THE RISER AS SHOWN IS NEW? |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT 250.50 WHICH REQUIRES ALL FOOTER |
| | STEEL ETC TO BE PART OF THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE ADDITION AND NEW FOOTER STEEL OR |
| | BUILDING STEEL ETC IS REQUIRED TO BE PART OF THE |
| | SYSTEM. |
| | PLEASE SHOW NEW SYSTEM. |
| | 250.50,250.54, 250.56 ETC. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED IN REVIEWS: THE |
| | RISER IS STILL SHOWING *EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS* |
| | AHEAD OF THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT(S) WHICH IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED. THIS CONDITION AS SHOWN WOULD CREATE |
| | OBJECTIONABLE CURRENTS AS STATED IN 250.6. |
| | PLEASE SEE 250.24 AS THIS REQUIRES BONDING AT THE FIRST |
| | MEANS OF DISCONNECT. WHEN THE BONDING IS DONE AT THE |
| | FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT AS REQUIRED PER 250.24 AND IF |
| | AN *EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR IS INSTALLED BEFORE |
| | THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT THEN THIS WOULD BE |
| | PARALLELING THE NEUTRAL. (OBJECTIONABLE CURRENTS) |
| | PLEASE ADJUST RISER. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE SET OF PLANS CONTAIN |
| | SHEETS FOR A LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM. |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COMPLETED SET OF PLANS ALONG WITH NEW |
| | SHEETS FOR REVISED COMMENTS AS WELL AS LIGHTNING |
| | PROTECTION SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEWS STATED A NOTE |
| | WHICH SAID *PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED |
| | COMMENTS*. IT ALSO STATED * IF THERE ARE ANY COMMENT |
| | WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN |
| | CONTACTING THIS REVIEWER*. |
| | PLEASE KNOW TO DATE NO CONTACT FROM THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD HAS BEEN MADE. |
| | **PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES GAVE NOTICE TO FS |
| | 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | PLEASE SEE SEVERAL OF THE CODE SECTIONS GIVEN ON ALL |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEWS STILL REMAIN. PLEASE SEE AS REQUIRED |
| | PER THE FLORIDA STATUTES 553.80(2)(B), A FEE HAS NOW |
| | BEEN ASSESSED AS REQUIRED FOR SAID REPEAT COMMENTS. |
| | THIS STATUTE APPLIES TO ANY OF THE SAME CODE COMPLIANT |
| | COMMENTS REPEATED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE AMOUNT DUE BEFORE PLANS MAY BE |
| | RESUBMITTED IS 4X TIMES THE PORTION OF THE BASE PERMIT |
| | FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLAN REVIEW. THE BASE PERMIT FEE WAS |
| | $12,500 AT 30% IS $3,750 TIME FOUR.THIS FEE IS |
| | $15,000.00. |
| | THIS FEE IS REQUIRED BEFORE PLANS MAY BE SUBMITTED. ** |
| | IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED THAT A MEETING BE HELD |
| | BETWEEN THE DESIGN TEAM AND THIS OFFICE ONCE ALL OF THE |
| | REVIEWS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AS THE STATUTE REQUIRES THE |
| | FINE EACH TIME THEREAFTER AS WELL. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THAT PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED BY THIS |
| | OFFICE AND WILL BE PLACED WITH PLANS WHICH WERE |
| | RETAINED FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS SUBMITTED ARE |
| | ALSO BEING RETAINED. |
| | PLEASE KNOW IF THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE DESIGN |
| | TEAM OR DESIGNER WHICH IS NOT SETTLED ON A LOCAL LEVEL |
| | THE PLANS WILL BE FORWARD TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF |
| | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND STATES LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE |
| | BOARD FOR REVIEW. |
| | THIS INFORMATION WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE ASSISTANT |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL MR. ROBERT BROWN. |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE ANY COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES |
| | WHICH MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS AND DESIGN CHANGES. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2007-07-07 15:50:24 | 2007-07-07 15:50:24 |
| | PLANS REMOVED FROM INCOMING. PLANS WILL BE RETURNED TO |
| | INCOMING WAITING FOR COMM BOARD ONCE ELECTRICAL REVIEW |
| | IS COMPLETED. |
