| Date |
Text |
| 2007-04-02 10:44:19 | ** UNSAT2ND REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE PLANS ARE NOW INDICATING A |
| | COMPLETE NEW PROPOSED SERVICE WHICH AT THIS TIME DOES |
| | NOT MEET 230.2 AND IS NOT GRANTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT THE LANDLORD SERVICE WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | TO BE UPGRADED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE RISER SHOWS FEEDS FROM THE FPL |
| | TRANSFORMER HOWEVER TWO SEPARATE VOLTAGES ARE ALSO |
| | SHOWN. |
| | PLEASE ADJUST AND GIVE INFORMATION FOR EXISTING SERVICE |
| | TO BE UPGRADED. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WITH THE |
| | PLANS.PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES FOR |
| | MANY OF THE AREAS EXCEED THAT OF WHICH IS SHOWN ON |
| | TABLES IN THE FBC. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THAT OCCUPANCY SENSORS |
| | ARE TO BE INSTALLED, HOWEVER THESE COULD NOT BE LOCATED |
| | ON PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE DETAIL SUBMITTED SHOWS MANUAL SWITCHES |
| | AFTER THE OC DEVICE, WHICHIF THE SWITCH IS IN THE OFF |
| | POSITION WOULD NO ALLOW ANY USE OF THE AUTOMATED MEANS |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION FOR THE LIGHTING |
| | CONTROLS. THE SWITCHES BEING NOTED AS SENSOR TYPES DOES |
| | NOT PROVIDE THE COVERAGE NEEDED. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.2 AND PLEASE THE AMOUNT OF |
| | THE WATTAGE ON TRANSFORMERS NEEDS TO BE SPECIFIED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LIMITS ON TRACK. |
| | PLEASE VERIFY THE METHOD WHICH IS BEING USED. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED NEEDS |
| | THE SEAL TO BE CLEAR AND VISIBLE WITH ALL INFORMATION |
| | ON SAID SEAL. |
| | 13-103.1.1.1 FS 471.025 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE A LOAD SUMMARY ON HOW LOADS FOR |
| | SHOW WINDOWS WERE DERIVED. (X-AMOUNT OF FEET TIMES |
| | 200VQA PER FT =Y). PLEASE PROVIDE IN THE SUMMARY HOW |
| | RECEPTACLE LOAD WAS DERIVED. (X AMOUNT OF DEVICES TIMES |
| | 180VA=?). |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LOAD SUMMARY WAS REVISED, HOWEVER COULD |
| | NOT LOCATE THELOAD OF 200VA PER FT ADDED FOR WINDOW |
| | AREAS. |
| | 220.43, 220.44 ETC. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS A |
| | GENERAL NOTE FOR THE FS 553.80(2)(B).IT IS UNCLEAR |
| | WHY THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN MADE AS THERE NOTHING THE |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS FROM PLAN REVIEW WHICH REFERENCED THIS |
| | FS. |
| | |
| | ** ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2007-03-31 18:37:36 | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW. |
