Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 06120693
Permit Number 06120693
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2007-08-24 19:11:31 
 *** DENIED2ND REVIEW ***
  
 *** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE
 STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH NEW COMMENTS
 BASED ON SOME INFORMATION ON REVISED PLANS.
  
 ** SEVERAL OF THE ITEMS BELOW WOULD HAVE BEEN REDLINED
 HOWEVER A COUPLE OF COMMENTS ARE NEEDED AT THIS TIME
 AND PLANS ARE COMING BACK FOR OTHER COMMENTS. PLEASE
 ADDRESS ALL AT THIS TIME EVEN AS MANY OF THESE WERE
 ITEMS WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN REDLINED.
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE CODE REFERENCES *2005
 NFPA-2005*. THIS APPEARS TO BE A MISPRINT AND WOULD
 HAVE BEEN REDLINED. SEE PLANS.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO
 RECESSED LIGHTING FIXTURES WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO MEET
 FBC 13-606.1.ABC.1.2.4. THE INCORRECT CODE SECTION WAS
 GIVEN BY THIS REVIEWER ON PREVIOUS REVIEW, HOWEVER THE
 TYPE OF FIXTURES ARE STILL REQUIRED.
 RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED LEGEND HOWEVER COULD
 NOT LOCATE ANY REFERENCE TO THE TYPE OF FIXTURES.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PANEL/SERVICE LOAD CALCULATIONS
 ARE BLANK AND NOT COMPLETE AT THIS TIME.
 PLEASE SEE NEC 220 FOR CALCULATIONS.
 PLEASE CLARIFY RECESSED LIGHTING FIXTURES IN LOAD
 CALCULATIONS AS THESE WITH THE AMOUNT SHOWN ON PLANS
 MAY NOT BE FIGURED IN THE GENERAL LIGHTING LOADS.220.14
  
 MAY CALL TO GO OVER THIS.
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.52 FOR A MISSING RECEPTACLE
 UPSTAIRS BEDROOM.
 THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN REDLINED ALSO.
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE ALL ROOM AND AREA DESIGNATIONS
 ON PLANS. THIS IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE PANEL SCHEDULE
 AS ALREADY SUBMITTED. 408.4
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 220.53, 210.52B1, 210.11C AS THE
 DINING ROOM RECEPTACLES ARE TO BE ON ONE OR *MORE* OF
 THE SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS. THE LOAD FOR EACH SMALL
 APPLIANCE CIRCUIT IS REQUIRED TO BE FIGURED AT 1.5KW.
 PLEASE KNOW THE TWO MINIMUM ARE ALREADY SHOWN AT 1.5,
 HOWEVER THE DINING ROOM IS SHOWN AT .85 WHICH NEEDS TO
 BE 1.5.
 PLEASE ADJUST
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SMOKE DETECTION DEVICES WERE
 REVISED ON PLANS TO BE LABELED AS *SMOKE ALARMS* YET
 THE PANEL SCHEDULE STILL INDICATES *SMOKE DETECTORS*.
 THIS SEEMS LIKE IT WAS MEANT TO BE CHANGED HOWEVER IF
 INDEED SD PLEASE CLARIFY AND ADJUST PLANS.
 NFPA-72 DEFINITIONS.
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AHU #2 AS THIS INDICATES A 50AMP
 OVER CURRENT PROTECTION ON ONE PHASE AND 60AMP ON THE
 OTHER PHASE.
 (MISPRINT HOWEVER PLEASE CORRECT AT THIS TIME).
 424.3B.
 FBC 106.1.2
  
 AS STATED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW:
 PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF
 THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY,
 NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO
 NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS
 REVIEWER.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved