| Date |
Text |
| 2007-05-18 16:17:16 | ** UNSAT 3RDREVIEW ** |
| | |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE MANY COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | TWO REVIEWS WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. ANY |
| | NEW COMMENTS ARE FROM CHANGES AND INFORMATION WHICH IS |
| | NOW BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST TIME FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW A RESPONSE LETTER FROM THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL IS MOST HELPFUL IN THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | ***IMPORANT*** |
| | PLEASE ALSO KNOW DUE TO THE PLANS NOT BEING COMPLETE AT |
| | THIS TIME AND THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FOR PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED, THERE MAY BE COMMENTS ON NEXT REVIEW WHICH |
| | ARE NOT ON THIS REVIEW. |
| | **** DUE TO THE EXTENT OF THE ELECTRICAL COMMENTS AND |
| | OTHER COMMENTS BASED ON LICENSING, ONE SET OF THE |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS ARE ONCE AGAIN BEING RETAINED. PLEASE |
| | SEE COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO FLORIDA STATUTES FOR |
| | REPEAT COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL CODE COMPLIANT |
| | SECTIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN REPEATED FOR THE THIRD REVIEW |
| | AND A FEE FOR THE PLAN REVIEW PORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE |
| | HAS NOW BEEN ASSESSED TO THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AS |
| | REQUIRED UNDER FS 553.80(2)(B). THIS WAS GIVEN AS A |
| | NOTICE ON PREVIOUS REVIEW AS SEVERAL CODES WERE |
| | REPEATED IN THE 2ND REVIEW. PLEASE KNOW THAT THIS FEE |
| | IS ASSESSED TO THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL UNDER FLORIDA |
| | STATUTES AND IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTOR OR |
| | OWNER. THE PLANS RETAINED FROM BOTH PREVIOUS REVIEWS |
| | AND THIS REVIEW WILL BE SENT TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF |
| | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW. THE FEE OF $3000.00 |
| | IS DUE BEFORE ANY PLANS MAY BE RE-SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW |
| | FOR THE 4TH REVIEW. |
| | ** PLEASE ALSO KNOW THAT TO DATE OF THIS REVIEW, NO ONE |
| | HAS CONTACTED THIS REVIEWER TO GO OVER ANY COMMENTS OR |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTES AS PREVIOUSLY STATED WITH |
| | RESPECT TO SIGNING OF PLANS. NO SIGNATURE VERIFICATION |
| | LETTER WAS LOCATED IN PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE PLANS SEEM TO BE SIGNED WITH AN INITIAL OF |
| | SOME SORT. IF THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL SIGNATURES OF |
| | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED, DATED |
| | AND SEALED LETTER WITH STATEMENT OF LEGAL SIGNATURE. |
| | FS 471.025 |
| | PLEASE BE SURE LETTER IS PROPERLY NOTARIZED UNDER |
| | FLORIDA STATUTES 117.05. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THIS LETTER WILL BE PLACED IN OUR SIGNATURE |
| | FILE FOR ANY FUTURE REFERENCE AS NEEDED AND WILL NOT BE |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE LETTER ON FUTURE PROJECTS. |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW, THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SHEETS AND FOR |
| | ALL TRADE REVIEWS WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY |
| | OTHER REVIEWER(S). |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT. ONLY THE NEC WAS |
| | ADDED. |
| | PLEASE SEE ONLY THE 2005 NEC WAS ADDED TO PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE CODES WHICH WERE REQUESTED FOR OTHERS |
| | WERE NOT ADDED. PLEASE SEE THAT ALL PLANS SHALL STATE |
| | THE CODE IN WHICH THEY ARE DESIGNED UNDER. THIS IS |
| | SUBMITTED UNDER THE NEW CODES. 2004 FBC W/ THE 2006 |
| | REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW. THIS IS ONE BUILDING BY DEFINITION AND ONLY ONE |
| | SERVICE IS PERMITTED AND GROUPING OF MAINS IS REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE REVISE RISER FOR NEW SINGLE SERVICE. |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND PLANS SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE |
| | PLANS DO NOT INDICATE GROUPING OF MAINS AS RISER SEEMS |
| | TO SHOW. PLEASE SEE MISSING SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS |
| | FOR NEW RISER. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE RISER AS SHOWN IS NOT CODE COMPLIANT |
| | WITH SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE NEC. PLEASE SEE OTHER |
| | COMMENTS RELEVANT TO THE RISER. |
| | THIS IS ONE *BUILDING* BY DEFINITION IN THE FBC AND |
| | ONLY ONE SERVICE PER 230.2 WILL BE GRANTED. PLANS SHOW |
| | TWO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS/SERVICE METERS. |
| | 230.70, 230.72, 240.4, 310.16, 310.15B6, ETC. PLEASE |
| | SEE THE SIZE OF THE METER CAN, CAN NOT BE VERIFIED AS |
| | NO LOAD CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED. FBC 106.1.2, |
| | 106.3.5.4(PARA 8) ADMIN SECTION. THERE ARE CURRENTLY |
| | MANY SECTIONS BESIDES THE ONES NOTED BELOW WHICH COULD |
| | NOT BE ALL TYPED IN THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW. RISER STILL SHOWS THIS. THIS NOTE AND CODE |
| | SECTION WILL BE APPLICABLE FOR NEW SERVICE ALSO. |
| | PLEASE SEE 250.6, 250.24B AS NO EQUIPMENT GROUNDING |
| | CONDUCTORS ARE PERMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST MEANS OF |
| | DISCONNECT. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE:AS THE SERVICE WILL CHANGE, THIS SAME COMMENT |
| | FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WILL REMAIN. PLEASE SEE AS THE |
| | SERVICE IS NOT COMPLETE AND THE SERVICE ENTRANCE |
| | CONDUCTORS ARE NOT SHOWN REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE CAN |
| | NOT BE DONE. BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE GEC AS SHOWN IT |
| | DOES NOT MEET THE SECTION OF THE CODE PREVIOUSLY |
| | GIVEN. |
| | PLEASE SEE 250.66 AS THE SIZE OF SERVICE MAY CHANGE |
| | WHICH WILL DICTATE THE SIZE OF THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE |
| | CONDUCTOR. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: SAME NOTE, NOTHING CHANGED. PLANS DO NOT |
| | INDICATE THE REQUIRED RATINGS FOR MAIN(S).PLEASE SEE |
| | ONLY THE BRACE RATING AND BRANCH CIRCUIT RATING IS |
| | BEING SHOWN FOR SUB PANEL(S). |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE AIC RATINGS FOR SERVICE MAINS PER |
| | 110.9. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE RATING AS SHOWN ON PANEL SCHEDULE WAS |
| | NOTED, HOWEVER NEEDED FOR MAIN(S). |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT. THE PANEL SCHEDULE |
| | IS NOT COMPLETE AND LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE NOT COMPLETE. |
| | WHERE ARE LOADS ON SERVICE FOR EACH PANEL AND SERVICE |
| | AS SHOWN ON RISER? PLEASE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A |
| | COMPLETE PANEL SCHEDULE WITH ALL MINIMUM REQUIRED |
| | DEDICATED LOADS AS WELL AS COMPLETED LOAD CALCULATIONS |
| | BASED ON MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FROM THE NEC. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS ARE NOT |
| | CORRECT, SHOWS 4500VA FOR TWO CIRCUITS? |
| | PLEASE SEE THE WASHER/ LAUNDRY LOADS WHICH ARE NOT |
| | CORRECT FOR MINIMUM LOADS PER NEC. |
| | PLEASE SEE NO LOAD IS SHOWN FOR A/C SYSTEM. NO LARGER |
| | LOADS? ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE 220.40, 220.82, 220.52, 220.54, 220.60, ETC, |
| | ETC. |
| | FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.4 |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT AS THE PANEL SCHEDULE |
| | STILL INDICATE THE DEDICATE BATH RECEPTACLE CIRCUIT ON |
| | WITH GARAGE RECEPTACLES. PLEASE SEE PLANS AS PLANS DO |
| | NOT INDICATE ANY KIND OF GARAGE?? |
| | PLEASE SEE 210.52D, 210.11C3, AS NO OTHER LOADS ARE |
| | PERMITTED ON THE DEDICATED BATH CIRCUIT(S). |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT. |
| | PLEASE SEE 210.52C1 FOR MISSING REQUIRED GFI'S ALONG |
| | KITCHEN COUNTER SPACE. |
| | MISSING MINIMUM VA 220.52 |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT.PLEASE SEE THAT |
| | THE PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATES THE DINING ROOM |
| | RECEPTACLES ON WITH LIGHTING AND MANY OTHER AREAS WHICH |
| | ARE NOT PERMITTED. |
| | NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING REQUIRED CIRCUITING FOR DINING ROOM |
| | RECEPTS PER 210.52B1, 210.11C1, AND 220. 52B. |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE:THIS COMMENT WILL REMAIN AS NOTED ABOVE IN |
| | NOTE #9 THERE ARE RECEPTACLES ALONG KITCHEN COUNTER |
| | SPACE WHICH ARE STILL MISSING. |
| | PLEASE SEE 210.8A6, AS ALL RECEPTS ALONG KITCHEN |
| | COUNTER SPACE SHALL BE SHOWN AS GFI. |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE:THIS COMMENT REMAINS AS THE MINIMUM |
| | CLEARANCES IN SOME OF THE CLOSETS ARE NOT MET. PLEASE |
| | SEE 410.8 AS THE PC LIGHTING IN CLOSETS ARE NOT |
| | PERMITTED AS SHOWN. THEY DO NOT MEET MINIMUM |
| | CLEARANCES. |
| | |
| | 14) NOTE: PLEASE GO OVER PLANS AS SCALE STILL SEEMS TO |
| | SHOW SOME NOT SPACED PER 210.52 |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING RECEPTS PER 210.52 FOR WALL |
| | SPACES. |
| | PLEASE SEE PLANS ARE STILL MISSING RECEPTACLES PER |
| | 210.52 |
| | |
| | 15) NOTE:THIS COMMENT IS THE SAME FROM PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW. PLEASE SEE ALL SMOKE DEVICES ARE STILL BEING |
| | SHOWN AS *SMOKE DETECTORS* AND SYMBOL LEGEND EVENS |
| | STATES AND SHOWS THESE BEING 110V UNITS WHICH THESE |
| | WOULD BE *SMOKE ALARMS* |
| | PLANS SHOW BOTH?? |
| | PLEASE SEE ALL SMOKE DEVICES SHALL BE SHOWN AS DEFINED |
| | IN NFPA-72. PLEASE SEE IF THESE DEVICES AS SHOWN ARE |
| | PART OF A LOW VOLTAGE ALARM SYSTEM WHICH CONTAINS |
| | HORN/ALARM DEVICES THEN THE SD AS SHOWN FOR SMOKE |
| | DETECTOR IS OK. IF THESE DEVICES AS SHOWN ARE DETECT |
| | AND SOUND AN ALARM, THEN THEY SHALL BE SHOWN AS SA FOR |
| | SMOKE ALARMS. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE NFPA-72 11.5.1.1, 11.8.3 FOR LOCATIONS |
| | REQUIRED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE ALL SLEEPING ROOMS. PLEASE |
| | SEE SOME ROOMS DO NOT INDICATE THE DEVICE OUTSIDE THE |
| | SLEEPING ROOM, YET INDICATE TWO DEVICES INSIDE ROOM? |
| | PLEASE SEE OTHER ROOMS WHICH DO INDICATE A DEVICE |
| | OUTSIDE ROOM, BUT STILL INDICATE TWO OR MORE INSIDE?? |
| | |
| | 16) NOTE: THIS COMMENT IS THE SAME. NO CORRECTION WAS |
| | MADE. |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING DISCONNECTS FOR ALL A/C EQUIPMENT. |
| | PLEASE SEE 440.11. STILL SHOWN AS RECEPTACLES WHICH ARE |
| | NOT PERMITTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE AHU CLOSET APPEARS TO SHOW TWO RECEPTS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW AS PER 422.31, AHU'S SHALL NOT BE PLUGGED |
| | IN. |
| | |
| | 17) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT. |
| | PLEASE SEE 422.31 FOR DISCONNECTING MEANS REQUIRED FOR |
| | WATER HEATER(S). |
| | |
| | |
| | 18) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 422.13 FOR REQUIRED LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR WATER HEATERS AS PREVIOUS PLANS DID |
| | NOT SHOW LOADS, THIS COMMENT IS NEW NOW THAT LOADS ARE |
| | SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 19) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT AS PLANS ARE STILL |
| | MISSING SEVERAL CIRCUITS WHICH THE REVIEW CAN NOT |
| | DETERMINE SPECIFIC USE OF SOME WHICH MAY NEED TO BE |
| | DEDICATED CIRCUITS ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE SEVERAL ELECTRICAL DEVICES ON PLANS WHICH |
| | ARE MISSING CIRCUITING. THERE ARE MANY ITEMS WHICH NEED |
| | CIRCUITING TO REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.4 |
| | |
| | 20) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT AS THE CODE REQUIRES |
| | *ALL OUTLETS* IN BEDROOMS TO CONTAIN ARC FAULT |
| | PROTECTION PLEASE SEE MISSING ARC FAULT PROTECTION FOR |
| | ALL OUTLETS IN BEDROOMS. 210.12 THIS IS NOT ONLY |
| | REQUIRED FOR RECEPTACLES. |
| | |
| | 21) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME RECEPTACLES ARE NOT BEING SHOWN |
| | SWITCHING THE ENTIRE RECEPTACLES WHICH IS OK, HOWEVER |
| | AS NOTED ABOVE PER 210.52, THEN RECEPTACLES WOULD BE |
| | REQUIRED IN ADDITION FOR GENERAL PURPOSE. |
| | |
| | 22) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT PLEASE SEE PLANS |
| | APPEAR TO NOW HAVE ONE NEW RECEPTACLE FOR WHAT APPEARS |
| | TO BE FOR THE DISHWASHER AND DISPOSAL BUT IT IS UNCLEAR |
| | AS ONE UNIT SHOWS THIS OUTLET AS GFI AND THE OTHER NOT |
| | GFI PROTECTED. PLEASE SEE 210.4, IF THESE ARE ON THE |
| | SAME YOKE/DEVICE THEN A 2-POLE BREAKER IS REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SHOW AND IDENTIFY THE RECEPTACLE FOR THESE |
| | ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 23) NOTE:THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW. PLEASE SHOW ALL ROOM AND AREA DESIGNATIONS ON |
| | PLANS IN ORDER TO REVIEW SOME CIRCUITING FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION. |
| | |
| | 24) NOTE:PLEASE SEE AS THE ADDRESS HAS CHANGED, |
| | PLEASE ADJUST TITLE BLOCKS AND REMOVE THE OLD 601 14TH |
| | ST. |
| | FAC 61G15-23, 61G1-16 |
| | |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
