| Date |
Text |
| 2007-06-01 08:37:51 | ***NOTE: PLANS SENT TO ENGINEERING FOR REVIEW OF |
| | SIDEWALK AND APPROACH. |
| | |
| | BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- PROVIDE RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. SEC. 713.13 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 2- DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWS ARROWS LEADING THE WATER TO THE |
| | NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. WATER CAN'T BE DIVERTED TO THE |
| | NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. REVISE PLAN AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET SP-1: |
| | A) SIZE OF PARKING SPACESSHOWN ON SITE PLAN DON'T |
| | MATCH SPECIFICATIONS ON PARKING NOTES AT BOTTOM OF |
| | PAGE. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | B) SITE PLAN AND SURVEY DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEE SURVEY. |
| | |
| | C) REVISE ADDRESS. CORRECT ADDRESS IS 1503 AND 1507 |
| | HENRIETTA AVE. |
| | |
| | D) DRIVEWAY TURN OUTS DETAIL DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. |
| | |
| | E) CLARIFY WHY INSTALLING BACK FLOW PREVENTER AND |
| | WHY ONLY ON ONE DWELLING?. |
| | |
| | F) LOCATION OF WATER METER IS WRONG. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | G) SETBACKS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN DON'T MATCH SETBACKS |
| | SHOWN ON SURVEY. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | H) SITE PLANAND SURVEY DON'T SHOW ALL CONCRETE |
| | SLABS SHOWN ON FOUNDATION PLAN. PROVIDE ALL |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 4- REVISE ADDRESS IN ALL DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | 5- PROVIDE TWO SURVEYS WITH CORRECT ADDRESS AND CORRECT |
| | DIMENSIONS. SEE FLOOR PLANS.AND SHOWING ALL CONCRETE |
| | SLABS.ONLY ONE SUBMITTED THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 6- SHEET S-1: |
| | A) DIMENSIONS ANDCOLUMN SPACINGDON'T MATCH.SEE |
| | PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) THERE ARE TWO F1 FOOTING DETAILS. ONE SHOULD BE |
| | F1 AND THE OTHERF2. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) FOUNDATION PLAN SHOWS CONCRETE SLAB EDGE TE AND |
| | TE#2. THERE IS NOT FOOTING SCHEDULE SPECIFYING WHAT ARE |
| | TE AND TE#2 SPECIFICATIONS. PROVIDE INFORMATION AS |
| | REQUIRED. AND CLARIFY WHY IS REAR CONCRETE SLAB SHOWN |
| | WITH DOTTED LINE. |
| | |
| | D) DIMENSIONS DON'T MATCH THOSE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON |
| | SURVEY. REVISE AS REQUIRED. ALSO, DIMENSIONS DON'T |
| | MATCH DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON FIRST FLOOR PLAN. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | E) REVISE TYP. EXT. CONT. MONOLITHIC FOOTING DETAIL. |
| | BOTTOM OF FOOTING NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 12" BELOW GRADE. |
| | SEC. R403.1.4 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | F) ENGINEER TO PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW |
| | VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT SHOWN IN FOUNDATION PLAN IS |
| | ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED WALL LATERAL |
| | STABILITY.SEE PLANS FOR COLUMN SPACING. SEC. 106.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | G) ENGINEER TO READ SOIL TEST REPORT AND REVISE |
| | FOUNDATION NOTES AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7- SHEET A-1: |
| | A) WINDOWS SPECIFIEDON PLAN DON'T MATCH. |
| | COORDINATE SIZE OF WINDOWS WITH WINDOW SCHEDULE AND |
| | WITH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS.ALL WINDOWS ARE KEYED AS I, |
| | BUT THEY ARE DIFFERENT SIZES.ALSO,INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE DOESN'T SHOW ANY I SYMBOL. THEY ARE SHOWN AS |
| | WINDOW 1 OR 2.ALSO, WINDOWS NOT DRAWN TO SCALE. |
| | COORDINATE AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) WINDOW ON KITCHEN AREA IS NOT AN EGRESS WINDOW. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) REVISE WINDOW AND DOOR BUCK DETAILS.BUCK NEEDS |
| | TO PROVIDE FULLWINDOW/DOOR FRAME SUPPORT. SEE SEC. |
| | R613.6.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER |
| | WAY OF INSTALLING BUCKS. |
| | |
| | D) WINDOW SILL DETAIL IS WRONG. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | E) FLOOR PLAN DOESN'T SHOW REAR CONCRETE SLAB. |
| | |
| | 8- SHEET A-2: |
| | A) DECORATIVE SHUTTERS NOTE SAYS THAT BAHAMA |
| | SHUTTERS ON 14TH STREET ONLY, BUT ALL ELEVATIONS SHOW |
| | BAHAMA SHUTTERS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) WINDOW SCHEDULE SHOWS WINDOW 1 WITH TRANSOM |
| | ABOVE. THERE ARE NOT WINDOWS WITH TRANSOM ABOVE SHOWN |
| | ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) OVERHANG AT FRONT OF BUILDING IS SHOWN AS 3'-0". |
| | THIS INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCHROOF PLAN AND TRUSS |
| | PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | D) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS FOR INSTALLATION OF ROOF |
| | BRACKETS AT ENTRY AREA. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 9- SHEET A-3: |
| | A) NEW NOTE IN THE MIDDLE OF PAGE STATES THAT |
| | BUILDING DESIGNED PER HVHZ.HVHZREQUIRES EXPOSURE |
| | "C" IN ALL DESIGN.SEE SEC. 1620.3 FBC 2004.REVISE |
| | INFORMATION ON TOP LEFT OF PAGE AND REVISE ALL LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) INFORMATION ON TOP LEFT PAGE CALLS FOR 140 MPH, |
| | WHILE TRUSS AND GIRDER NOTES CALLS FOR 146 MPH. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) WHAT IS THE ROOF +92.0 PSFSHOWN ON TOP LEFT |
| | PAGE STANDS FOR?. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | D) TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE: |
| | * ANCHORS ARE NOT KEYED CORRECTLY IN THE ROOF FRAMING |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | ** REVISE H-14 CONNECTOR. NEED TO SPECIFY WOOD TO |
| | MASONRY CONNECTOR. |
| | |
| | *** SPECIFY SIZE OF META CONNECTOR. |
| | |
| | **** REVISE NUMBER OF FASTENERS AND LOADS FOR WHICH |
| | CONNECTORS ARE DESIGNED FOR. SEE CURRENT SIMPSON |
| | CATALOGUE AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. OTHERWISE, COMPLETE |
| | ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR FASTENERS AND |
| | LOADS THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY |
| | THE MANUFACTURE. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | ***** SEE TRUSS PACKAGE AND REVISE SPECIFIED CONNECTORS |
| | TO RESIST THE CALCULATED LOADS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | E) ROOF PLAN SHOWS TRUSSESRUNNING FRONT TO BACK BY |
| | TENANT SEPARATION WALL. SEE TRUSS PLAN FOR CORRECT |
| | TRUSS LAYOUT AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.AND SPECIFY ALL |
| | TRUSS CONNECTORS AT BOTH ENDS. |
| | |
| | F) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECS FOR WOOD |
| | LEDGER TO RECEIVE ROOF TRUSSES. SEE TRUSS PLAN. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | G) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTINUITY OF |
| | TENANT SEPARATION WALL.SPECIFY TIE BEAM AND RAKE |
| | BEAM. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | H) PNEUMATIC FASTENING SCHEDULE: |
| | * PROVIDE ONLY THE INFORMATION THAT PERTAINS TO THIS |
| | PROJECT TO AVOID CONFLICTS. |
| | |
| | ** COORDINATE INFORMTIONTO MATCH WITH PLANS AND |
| | DETAILS. EG: CHECK ROOF SHEATHING SIZE AND BUCK DETAILS |
| | AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 10- PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE, BRING PLANS TO |
| | THE FIFTH FLOOR FOR HISTORICAL APPROVAL AFTER |
| | CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE ORIGINAL PLANS. |
| | |
| | 11- SHEET A-4: |
| | A) TENANT SEPARATION WALL DETAIL: |
| | * PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR TOP PORTION OF THE |
| | WALL. |
| | |
| | ** CLARIFY WHY SOFFIT ELEVATION VARIES? |
| | |
| | *** REVISE NOTE REGARDING APPROVED HURRICANE STRAPS. |
| | THIS IS NOT A WOOD FRAMED WALL. |
| | |
| | **** CONCRETE SLAB INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH FOUNDATION |
| | PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ***** DETAIL FOR VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT IS DRAWN |
| | INCORRRECTLY.PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT INCLUDING SPLICING ETC.SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | ****** HOW ARE THE TRUSSES RESTING ON THIS WALL? |
| | |
| | B) WHERE DOES THE STRAP AND TIE DOWN DETAIL APPLIES |
| | TO?SEC. 106.1.2CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | C) TYPICAL WALL SECTION: |
| | * TRUSS CONNECTOR INFORMATION TO MATCH TRUSS ANCHOR |
| | SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | ** SPECIFY MIN. FOOTING DEPTH AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R403.1.4 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 12- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING CORRECT ADDRESS AND BUILDER. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE REVISED FORM 600A-2004 R. |
| | |
| | C) IF CALCULATIONS ARE NOT DONE FOR WORST CASE |
| | SCENARIO, THEN THEY SHALL BE DONE WITH ACTUAL BUILDING |
| | ORIENTATION. SEE SURVEY FOR CORRECT ORIENTATION. |
| | |
| | D) ENGINEER TO PROVIDE HIS NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER |
| | AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 OF FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | E) OVERHANG HEIGHT AND OVERHANG LENGTH ARE |
| | INCORRECT. THEY CAN'T BE ZERO. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 13- ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKING THE CEILING FAN |
| | CREDIT. THEREFORE NEED TO SPECIFY IN DRAWINGS CEILING |
| | FAN SIZE IN ALL ROOMS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 14- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY RULE 9B-72 |
| | FOR: |
| | A) ROOF SHINGLES. |
| | |
| | B) PRECAST LINTELS. |
| | |
| | C) ALL TRUSS CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 15- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***NOTE: SOME PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE THE REVIEW STAMP |
| | FROM AMD GROUP. WHO IS THIS?THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IS |
| | DM & L ENGINEERING. |
| | |
| | 16- PROVIDE 2 SURVEYS WITH CORRECT ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 17- ENGINEER WAS CHARGED 4 TIMES FEE FOR PLAN REVIEW |
| | FOR MULTIPLE DENIED CHECKLIST AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA |
| | STATUTE 553.80(2)(B).SEE ATTACHED COPY.ENGINEER |
| | OWES $3362.34. |
| | |
| | 18- TRUSS PACKAGE: |
| | A) TRUSSES NEED TO BE DESIGNED USING ASCE 7-02NOT |
| | ASCE 7-05.REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) ENGINEER TO DATE DRAWINGS WHEN SEAL IS IMPRESSED |
| | AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | C) GENERAL DETAILS ARE TOO DARK AND ARE NOT |
| | LEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | D) WHO'S ADM GROUP?.THIS IS NOT THE ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD. |
| | |
| | D) REVISED TRUSS PACKAGE TO BE SUBMITTED TO BUILDING |
| | INSPECTOR AT TIME OF FRAMING INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | 19- SOIL TEST REPORT: |
| | A) MISSING KEY PLAN SHOWING LOCATION OF BORINGS. |
| | |
| | B) ENGINEER TO PROVIDE THE COMPANY CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IN THE LETTERHEAD AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 61G15-23.002 OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: |
| | * PLEASE DON'T ATTACHPRODUCT APPROVALS TO PLANS. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
