| Date |
Text |
| 2007-04-29 13:47:47 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE |
| | FBC2004 |
| | |
| | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | PERMIT PICKUP, FS713.13. |
| | |
| | 2.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD.THE PLANS |
| | MUST BE STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| | APPLICATION.PLEASE CALL 561-233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 3.)RADON FEES HAVE BEEN ADDED FS553.721.THIS MAY BE |
| | ADJUSTED AFTER EXACT BUILDING SIZE IS DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 4.) FBC* 109.3.7RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR |
| | RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, |
| | DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A RESIDENT |
| | INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO |
| | ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II |
| | CONSTRUCTION |
| | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS |
| | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE |
| | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE |
| | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI |
| | - PILE DRIVING |
| | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA |
| | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT |
| | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR METHODS |
| | OF CONSTRUCTION |
| | |
| | ALSO, PLEASE ARRANGE WITH HAROLD PISKURA (INSPECTION |
| | SERVICES MANAGER - TEL: |
| | 561 805 6711), A MEETING INVOLVING THE OWNER, RESIDENT |
| | INSPECTOR, JOB INSPECTOR, CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER. THIS |
| | MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.THREE ORIGINAL |
| | SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW ? THREE SETS OF PLANS SUBMITTED, ONLY TWO |
| | SETS OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED.THREE SETS |
| | OF ALL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED, SEE FIRST REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 5.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 6.)ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC61G16-23.002 IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE ON EACH SHEET SEALED BY THE ENGINEER |
| | (CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - THIS WAS DONE ON THE PLANS BUT NOT ON THE |
| | CALCS. |
| | 7-8.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 9.)DECLARE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT, FBC CHAPTER 5..NOTE |
| | THAT THE SHINGLE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS LIMITED TO A MRH |
| | OF LESS THAN 33 FEET.PLEASE CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS IF |
| | THIS IS AN ISSUE. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW ? MRH IS GREATER THAN 33?.SUBMIT COMPLIANT |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | 10.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 11.)SHEET A1.0 REFERS TO OCCUPANCY SEPARATION; IS |
| | THIS REFERRING TO TENANT SEPARATION? |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW ? OCCUPANCY SEPARATION ALSO REQUIRED, AS |
| | WELL AS EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATING REQUIREMENT.SEE |
| | OTHER COMMENTS AND INCLUDE ON A1.0. |
| | |
| | 12-13.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 14.)SEE FBC406, FBC311.3.THE GARAGES AND ACCESS TO |
| | THE INDIVIDUAL GARAGE SPACES ACT AS A PARKING GARAGE. |
| | OCCUPANCY SEPARATION REQUIRED FBC302.3.2, BOTH |
| | HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL.PENETRATIONS AND DUCTS TO BE |
| | PROTECTED, FBC716, FBC712. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW ? THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT ?ALTERNATE |
| | METHOD? IS TO BE USED.WHAT ALTERNATE METHOD?WHERE |
| | IN THE CODE IS THIS ALLOWED?THIS COMMENT WAS NOT |
| | PROPERLY ADDRESSED ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 15.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 16.)THE PARKING GARAGE VENTILATION TO BE IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, MECHANICAL. |
| | |
| | 16.)NFPA 13 SYSTEM REQUIRED AS PARKING GARAGE IS NOT |
| | A RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY, SEE NFPA 13R 1.1, NFPA 101. |
| | ALSO SEE FBC504.2, NFPA 13 SYSTEM REQUIRED IF YOU ARE |
| | USING AREA MODIFICATIONS FOR SPRINKLED BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW ? THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS IS NOT |
| | NEEDED.HOWEVER, NFPA 13 SYSTEM WILL BE REQUIRED IF |
| | YOU USE SPRINKLERS FOR AREA INCREASES.SEE OTHER |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 17.)A5.2, DESIGNER HAS NOT PROVIDED CALCULATIONS IN |
| | REGARDS TO OPENINGS FOR THE REAR ELEVATION FBC704.8. |
| | NOTE THAT DISTANCE IS TO BE MEASURED TO THE CENTER OF |
| | THE ALLEY FOR DISTANCE TO ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW ? NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED.ARCHITECT STATES |
| | THAT 75% IS ALLOWED, 26.28% PROVIDED.THIS IS FOR |
| | PROTECTED OPENINGS.UNPROTECTED OPENINGS ARE LIMITED |
| | TO 26.28%.DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE IS 11?, SHOULD BE |
| | USING DISTANCE TO ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE WHICH APPEARS |
| | TO BE APPROX 26?. |
| | |
| | RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION, A1.2, APPEARS TO BE 35? TO |
| | ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE.UNLIMITED OPENINGS ALLOWED.IT |
| | IS NOT CLEAR WHY YOU HAVE INCLUDED THIS CALCULATION. |
| | |
| | 18-23.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 23.)DECLARE TOTAL BUILDING SIZE.SHOW COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH FBC TABLE 503.SHOW AREA INCREASE CALCULATIONS ON |
| | THE PLAN.PLEASE SEE DEFINITION OF BUILDING AREA, TO |
| | INCLUDE AREA INCLUDED WITHIN THE HORIZONTAL PROJECTION |
| | OF THE FLOOR ABOVE (FIRST FLOOR AREA COVERED BY |
| | BALCONIES ON SECOND FLOOR TO BE INCLUDED).DECLARE |
| | TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA FOR EACH OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW ? OVERALL DIMENSIONS S1.1 ARE 228?7X104?4, |
| | WHICH WOULD BE OVER 23,000 SF, BUT YOU DECLARED MUCH |
| | LESS FOR EACH FLOOR.SEE DEFINITION OF BUILDING AREA, |
| | FBC 502. ALSO ARCHITECT STATES IN THE CALCULATIONS THAT |
| | AREA INCREASE IS 28000 SF WITHOUT SPRINKLERS, BUT |
| | STATES THAT 48,000 IS ALLOWED.AREA INCREASES FOR |
| | SPRINKLERS REQUIRES NFPA13 SYSTEM, FBC 504.2. |
| | |
| | 24.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 25.)WIND DESIGN CRITERIA ON CALCULATIONS PREPARED BY |
| | RICARDO DIAZ, PE STATES EXPOSURE C BUT THE CALCULATIONS |
| | WERE RUN USING EXPOSURE B.SHEET S1.0 ALSO DECLARES |
| | EXPOSURE B. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW ? REMOVE OLD SHEETS AND REPLACE WITH NEW |
| | SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 26.)CALCULATIONS WERE DONE USING ASCE7-05.SEE |
| | FBC35, ASCE7-02 IS THE CORRECT STANDARD. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW ? REMOVE OLD SHEETS AND REPLACE WITH NEW |
| | SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 27.)THE AGREEMENT FOR UNITY OF TITLE IS NOT SIGNED BY |
| | ALL PARTIES AND OWNER ON THE UNITY OF TITLE IS NOT THE |
| | OWNER OF RECORD (CLERK?S OFFICE).THIS ISSUE IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.THE |
| | PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT CROSSES THE PROPERTY LINE WHICH |
| | WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT A FIREWALL, FBC CHAPTER |
| | 6. |
| | |
| | 28.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 29.)STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC TABLE |
| | 601.SHOW CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE OR LISTED |
| | ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW ? 2 HOUR WALL REQUIRED FOR EXTERIOR WALLS, |
| | BUT THIS IS NOT NOTED ANYWHERE ON THE PLAN OTHER THAN |
| | THE DETAIL.PLEASE NOTE ON THE SITE PLAN, |
| | ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 30-36.) ADDESSED. |
| | |
| | 37.)PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR U301, A7.1. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW ? I BELIEVE THIS WAS ADDRESSED, BUT THE NEW |
| | DETAIL IS NOT LABELED WITH ASSEMBLY NUMBER OR FIRE |
| | RATING. |
| | |
| | 38-44.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 45.)S1.0, 3 N REFERS TO FBC 2001.OTHER ASTM AND ACI |
| | REFERENCES ARE EXPIRED.CHECK ALL. |
| | |
| | 46.)THERE ARE THREE CONFLICTS/INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN |
| | THE SOILS (WHICH ENGINEER REFERS TO ON S1.0) AND THE |
| | SOILS ENGINEER RECOMMENDATIONS.THEY ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| | |
| | A. S1.1 SPECS 6ML VAPOR BARRIER, SOILS RECOMMENDS 10ML |
| | MINIMUM. |
| | |
| | B. S5, WF16 IS 16INCH FOOTING, SOILS RECOMMENDS 24INCH |
| | MINIMUM.THE DESIGN OF COLUMNS ON EITHER SIDE OF THIS |
| | VERY SHORT FOOTING UNDER THE GARAGE DOOR IS NOTED. |
| | |
| | C. ENGINEER REFERS TO THE FOUNDATION CONDITIONS. |
| | NOWHERE ON THE PLAN DOES IT MENTION THE EXCAVATION |
| | REQUIREMENT.PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THIS REPORT HAS BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 47.)A1.2, TRASH COMPACTOR GATES SWING OVER THE PUBLIC |
| | WAY, FBC3202.2. |
| | |
| | 48.)A5.2, ?LEFT ELEVATION? IS ON THE RIGHT ON A1. |
| | THE LONG SIDES ARE LABELED ?FRONT? AND ?REAR? BUT BOTH |
| | HAVE UNIT ENTRANCES AND FACE STREETS. |
| | |
| | 49.)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. |
| | |
| | |
