| Date |
Text |
| 2007-08-15 11:30:28 | 2004 FBC W/ 2005 SUPPLEMENT |
| | ADD WINDOWS AND INSTALL FACADE |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) SUBMIT NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. |
| | |
| | 2) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. |
| | IN ADDITION TO THE FLORIDA COVERSHEETS, THE STATE |
| | APPROVED EVALUATION REPORT OR MIAMI-DADE NOA SPECIFYING |
| | THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE PRODUCT AND THE |
| | INSTALLATION DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR |
| | REVIEW. SEE FAC RULE 9B-72. IF MULTIPLE PRODUCTS ARE |
| | LISTED, SPECIFY THE ONES THAT WILL BE USED. |
| | |
| | 3)THE STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVERSHEETS THAT WERE |
| | SUBMITTED FOR THE JELD-WEN-POZZI CASEMENT WINDOWS AND |
| | FIXED WINDOWS ARE FOR THE 2001 CODE VERSION. SUBMIT THE |
| | ONES FOR THE 2004 CODE ALONG WITH THE NOA OR OTHER |
| | EVALUATION REPORT AS REQUESTED IN COMMENT #2. |
| | |
| | 4) PLEASE REVIEW PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ADEQUATE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES AND IMPACT PROTECTION. CHECK FOR CORRECT CODE |
| | ADDITION AND CURRENT REVISIONS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | CHECK THAT THE MULLIONS SPECIFIED ARE COMPATIBLE WITH |
| | THE WINDOW MODELS THAT ARE SPECIFIED. |
| | |
| | 5) THE BEAM ANALYSIS THAT WAS SUBMITTED IS FOR A W12 X |
| | 65STEEL I-BEAM, WHICH HAS BEEN CHANGED ON THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS TO A HSS 8 X 8 X 1/2" TUBE STEEL |
| | BEAM. SUBMIT ANENGINEERED ANALYSIS OF THE TUBE STEEL |
| | BEAM FOR BENDING AND TORSION. 2004 FBC* 106.1.2 |
| | (AMENDED) |
| | |
| | 6) PROVIDE THE COLUMN SPACING DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS |
| | FOR THE COLUMNS THAT WILL BE SUPPORTING THE BEAM. 2004 |
| | FBC* 106.1.2 (AMENDED) |
| | |
| | - ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
