| Date |
Text |
| 2007-01-15 11:13:12 | *** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW*** |
| | |
| | TD AMERITRADE |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW STILL |
| | NEED TO BE ADDRESSED ALONG WITH SOME NEW COMMENTS BASED |
| | ON CHANGES MADE TO PLANS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY |
| | FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW IN THE SAME NUMERICAL ORDER. THEY |
| | WILL CONTAIN A NO, OK, OR NO/OK. |
| | A) NO WILL BE FOLLOWED BY FURTHER EXPLANATION OF THE |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT. |
| | B) OK, MAY REFERENCE TO ANY NEW NOTES, HOWEVER WILL |
| | HAVE PREVIOUS NOTE REMOVED. |
| | C) NO/OK, WILL BE FOLLOWED BY FURTHER EXPLANATION AS |
| | PART OF THE COMMENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED FULLY |
| | AND PART OF THE PREVIOUS COMMENT MAY BE OK. |
| | |
| | ** ANY NEW NOTES WILL BE AT THE BOTTOM AND IDENTIFIED |
| | AS*** NEW NOTES ***. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT A DETAILED RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS |
| | IN THE SAME NUMERICAL ORDER WOULD HELP IN THE REVIEW |
| | PROCESS. PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSES DO NOT CORRELATE TO |
| | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE:NO/OK. PLEASE SEE THAT MOST OF THE TITLE |
| | BLOCKS ON EACH SHEET WAS REVISED; HOWEVER PLEASE SEE |
| | COVER SHEET WHICH STILL CONTAINS THE ARCHITECTURAL FIRM |
| | WHICH DOES NOT CONTAIN A CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION |
| | NUMBER ALSO KNOWN AS A FIRM LICENSE NUMBER THROUGH THE |
| | DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION. |
| | THIS COMMENT IS MADE AS IT IS REQUIRED TO BE CORRECTED |
| | EVEN THOUGH IT WILL NOT AFFECT THE ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING INFORMATION ON TITLE BLOCKS FOR |
| | ARCHITECT AND ARCHITECTURAL FIRM AS REQUIRED UNDER |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G1-16.004 AND FLORIDA |
| | STATUTES 481.219 |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING FIRM LICENSE NUMBER ALSO KNOWN AS |
| | THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING THE PRINTED NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER |
| | OF THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD. |
| | ** THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SHEETS AND FOR |
| | ALL TRADES WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER |
| | TRADE REVIEWER(S). |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE:OK/NO THIS WAS DONE; HOWEVER SEE COMMENTS |
| | BELOW AS THIS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR NEW ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS. PLEASE SEE TWO DIFFERENT SETS OF |
| | ENERGY/COM-CHECK SUBMISSIONS. |
| | ** THIS PREVIOUS NOTE VERBIAGE WILL BE LEFT FOR |
| | INFORMATION ONLY AS COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED SHALL BE |
| | SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY THE DESIGNER/ENGINEER |
| | RESPONSIBLE. PLEASE ALSO SEE OTHER COMMENTS BASED ON |
| | THESE SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE SECTION ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | WHICH REQUIRES THE OWNER/AGENT TO ALSO SIGN. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE:NO. PLANS WERE SUBMITTED; HOWEVER COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECTIONS GIVEN IN |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN MET. PLEASE SEE THAT THE |
| | FBC CHAPTER 11 FOR ADA REQUIREMENTS EXCEED THAT OF THE |
| | NFPA-72 AND THE MORE RESTRICTIVE SHALL APPLY. PLEASE |
| | SEE THE LIGHTING LEVELS FOR STROBES MUST MEET |
| | 11-4.28.3(4). |
| | PLEASE SEE THE MINIMUM LEVELS FOR AUDIBLE DEVICES ARE |
| | NOT SHOWN. PLEASE SEE 11-4.28.2. |
| | PLEASE SEE A NOTE WAS ADDED TO THE PLAN WHICH STATES A |
| | 4.28 FOR ADA REQUIREMENTS? PLEASE SPECIFY THE CODE |
| | SECTIONS WHICH ARE RELEVANT AND AS GIVEN IN THIS TEXT |
| | NOTE AND PREVIOUS TEXT NOTES. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE MINIMUM FIRE ALARM PLANS SHOWING LAYOUT OF |
| | NEW OR EXISTING DEVICES MEETING THE 2004 FBC AND 2002 |
| | NFPA-72 SHALL BE SUBMITTED. PLEASE KNOW, EVEN AS SCOPE |
| | OF WORK IS REQUIRED UNDER SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT THE |
| | BASE SYSTEM SHALL BE SHOWN IN BASE BUILD OUT PLANS. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE NEW OR EXISTING HORN AND STROBES |
| | MEETING 2004 FBC 11-4.28.1,.2.3(4). |
| | PLEASE SEE .3(4) WHICH REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 75 CANDELAS |
| | WHICH IS ABOVE THE MINIMUMS REQUIRED IN NFPA-72. FBC |
| | ADMIN SECTION 106.1.2, 106.1.1.1 |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER SEE NEW NOTES. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE THERE ARE NOW TWO SUBMITTED |
| | LIGHTING COMPLIANCE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE |
| | EITHER ONE CAN BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE AND |
| | COORDINATION WITH THE PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE ONE DOES NOT SUPPLY THE INFORMATION AND IS |
| | STILL INDICATING METHOD A AND IT IS NOT KNOWN TO THIS |
| | OFFICE HOW METHOD A APPLIES. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE A COM-CHECK VERSION WAS ALSO SUBMITTED |
| | WHICH STATES 90.1/2001 EDITION. PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY |
| | VERSIONS MUST BE DONE AND STATE THE 2004 FBC. PLEASE |
| | ALSO SEE THE OCCUPANCY SPECIFIED IN CALCULATIONS STATE |
| | "RETAIL". THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE AS THIS IS NOT A RETAIL |
| | SPACE. PLEASE SEE TABLES 415.2.C.1, 415.2.B.1, THESE |
| | TABLES DO CONTAIN THE OCCUPANCY AND USE AS REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE TO CORRELATE ALL OF THE FIXTURE WATTAGES |
| | WITH THAT WHICH IS PERMITTED. |
| | ** IF THIS WERE A RETAIL SPACE, THEN PLANS WOULD BE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE CHANGED TO MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY. PLEASE |
| | SEE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS WHICH CONTAIN THE STATED |
| | OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DO NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE PLANS SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE THE |
| | NUMBER OF FIXTURES AND WATTAGE DO NOT MATCH. THERE IS A |
| | SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCE. |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 13-415.2.ABC.1, AND PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE MAXIMUM LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES. |
| | PLEASE KNOW, BASED ON METHOD "A" THIS WILL NOT GIVE YOU |
| | THE CORRECT INFORMATION AS NEEDED AS THE SQ FT WILL BE |
| | ENTERED UNDER 5K SQ FT. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE AREAS WHERE CONTROL MENTIONS |
| | MANUAL, INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED AUTO SHUT OFF. PLEASE |
| | SEE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE:NO/OK, PLEASE SEE SOME COMPLIANCE HAS BEEN |
| | MET HOWEVER THE OVER RIDES TIMES ON ALL DEVICES SHALL |
| | BE STATED. THE MAXIMUM TIMES WERE GIVEN ON PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW DEPENDING ON THE DEVICE CHOSEN. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME ROOMS WHICH ARE CONSIDERED SEPARATE |
| | SPACES DO NOT CONTAIN ANY CONTROL DEVICES AS REQUIRED |
| | PER 13-415.1.ABC.1.2. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE INGRESS/EGRESS AREA AT MAIN |
| | ENTRANCE, COULD NOT LOCATE ANY DEVICES TO OVER RIDE |
| | SYSTEM. 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. |
| | PLEASE SEE WHAT APPEARS TO BE A MOTION DEVICE SHOWN ON |
| | PLANS WHICH DOES NOT SHOW ANY CONNECTION POINT. |
| | (HALLWAY AREA). |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE DETAIL PROVIDED FOR THE CONNECTION OF |
| | EMERGENCY AND EXIT LIGHTS. THE NOTE MENTIONS TO CONNECT |
| | AHEAD OF THE SWITCHING DEVICE; HOWEVER THE EM/EXT LTS |
| | AS SHOWN APPEAR TO BE SHOWN ON THE LOAD SIDE OF THE |
| | SWITCH IN DETAIL. PLEASE KNOW THAT THIS IS SOMETHING |
| | THAT IS COMMON AND SHOULD BE KNOWN, HOWEVER PLEASE KNOW |
| | THAT SINCE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CHAPTER 13 OF THE FBC, |
| | THE AHJ HAS HAD NUMEROUS SITUATIONS WHERE THE EMERGENCY |
| | AND EXIT LIGHTS ARE BEING CONNECTED ON THE LOAD SIDE OF |
| | THE OCCUPANCY SENSORS, THE LOAD OF SIDE OF THE LCP AND |
| | THE OVER RIDES DEVICES.PLEASE ADJUST DETAIL OR CALL |
| | THIS REVIEWER TO GO OVER THIS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13, 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND |
| | .1.3. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOMATED MEANS OF SHUTTING OFF |
| | LIGHTING AFTER NORMAL SCHEDULED HOURS. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE SYSTEM OR METHODS OF CONTROL. PLEASE BE |
| | SURE THAT ALL DEVICE SYMBOLS ON PLANS CORRELATE WITH |
| | THE SYMBOL LEGEND PROVIDE. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE THE MAXIMUM TIMES ON ANY OVER RIDE |
| | DEVICES AS REQUIRED. |
| | (PLEASE KNOW A MAXIMUM 30MINS IS PERMITTED ON OCCUPANCY |
| | TYPE DEVICES AND 4HRS MAX ON TIMER TYPE OVER RIDES). |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE TIME OF SCHEDULING. |
| | ETC. |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE:OK. *** NOT TO BE USED OR CONTAIN EQUIPMENT |
| | AS DEFINED FOR AN IT ROOM. |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: NO/OK, PLEASE SEE A NOTE HAS BEEN ADDED TO |
| | PLANS AND THE WALLS SEEM TO HAVE BEEN MOVED AS PER |
| | SCALE THE CLEARANCE FOR EACH PANEL AND DIFFERENT |
| | VOLTAGES SEEM TO BE MET. |
| | PLEASE SEE HOWEVER THAT NOW THAT THE RISER HAS BEEN |
| | REVISED (SEE NEW MAIN), THE LOCATION OF NEW EQUIPMENT |
| | ADDED TO RISER WHICH IS STATED AS EXISTING IS NOT |
| | LOCATED ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE THAT VERIFICATION FOR |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH 110.26 STILL CAN NOT BE CONFIRMED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| | PLEASE SEE AS SHOWN ON PLANS, THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT |
| | BEING NOTED AS EXISTING AND BEING NOTED IN AN EXISTING |
| | ELECTRICAL CLOSET DOES NOT MEET CODE. PLEASE SEE THE |
| | MINIMUM CLEARANCES FOR ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL MEET |
| | 110.26. |
| | THIS ARE SHALL NOT BE STORAGE ALSO. |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER SEE NOTE ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO |
| | CLEARANCES. |
| | |
| | 14) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER SEE NOTE #12 ABOVE WITH RESPECT |
| | TO CLEARANCES. |
| | |
| | ** NEW NOTES ** |
| | |
| | 15) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE NEW LOCATION OF THE NEW |
| | LCP WHICH HAS BEEN ADDED TO PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY IF |
| | THIS TYPE OF PANEL CONTAINS OVER CURRENT PROTECTION OF |
| | ANY KIND OR NOT? PLEASE KNOW IF IT DOES, IT WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED PER 110.26, 408.7, 240.24(C) |
| | AND (D). |
| | |
| | 16) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY CIRCUITING FROM THE PANEL H TO |
| | THE LCP AS THE THERE IS NO SCHEDULE ETC SHOWN FOR |
| | THIS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THE PANEL DIRECTORIES SHOULD BE SPECIFIC TO |
| | THE ROOMS AND AREAS IN WHICH THEY CIRCUITED TO. IE; |
| | OFFICE 1 RECEPTS, BREAKRM RECEPTS, ETC |
| | |
| | 17) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME. |
| | ONE SET OF PLANS MAY BE RETAINED BY THE OFFICE AT THIS |
| | TIME. |
| | |
| | 18) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT FEES OF $2.397.60 ARE DUE TO |
| | VALUE FOR SCOPE OF WORK ADJUSTMENT. |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
