| Date |
Text |
| 2008-09-09 16:26:31 | ***CORRECTIONS** |
| | |
| | JONATHAN BRAMLEY |
| | 561-494-1040 |
| | |
| | **NOTE - CIVIL SHEETS SUBMITTED DO NOT MATCH SHEETS |
| | SUBMITTED FOR THE ISSUED SITEWORK PERMIT** |
| | |
| | 1. THE ISSUED PERMIT WAS SIGNED AND SEALED BY MICHAEL |
| | W. HAGERTY, PE; NEW SHEETS SUBMITTED WITH 06111067 ARE |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED BY PHILIP ROWE, JR., PE. THE PLANS |
| | ARE TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE PROFESSIONAL |
| | ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, FAC61G15-23.002(2). IF |
| | THIS IS A SUCCESSOR ENGINEER, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER |
| | STATING THAT THE PROCEDURES OF FAC61G15-27.001 HAVE |
| | BEEN FOLLOWED. |
| | |
| | 2. THE NEW CIVIL SHEETS SUBMITTED WITH 06111067 DO NOT |
| | MATCH THE SITEWORK PERMIT RECORD SET. SHEETS 6 AND 7-9 |
| | WERE REMOVED FROM THE SITEWORK PERMIT (SHEETS REMOVED |
| | AND STRUCK OUT ON THE INDEX SHEET). PLEASE REVISE THE |
| | SITEWORK PERMIT AS NECESSARY. AS THE SITEWORK PERMIT |
| | HAS ALREADY ISSUED, THE PAGES SUBMITTED WITH THE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT SHOULD MATCH THE RECORD SET. |
| | |
| | 3. THE SHEETS SUBMITTED WITH 06111067 DO NOT INDICATE |
| | ANY CHANGES; NO CLOUDS OR REVISION NUMBERS, ALTHOUGH |
| | REVISIONS WERE MADE (INDEX SHEET, ADDITION OF SHEETS 6 |
| | THROUGH 9). CHANGES TO THE PLAN ARE TO BE CLEARLY |
| | INDICATED WITH CLOUDS AND REVISION DATES/NUMBERS. |
| | |
| | 4. IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO SHOW CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE FOR THE BUILDING (FOR EXAMPLE, PARKING OR A |
| | SITE PLAN), AND ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR BUILDING, |
| | ZONING, ETC. ARE SHOWN ON OTHER SHEETS (ARCHITECTURAL |
| | OR ENGINEERING SHEETS), THEY CAN BE REMOVED FROM THE |
| | PLAN. AS THE SITEWORK PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED, THEY |
| | MIGHT NOT BE NECESSARY FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT. PLEASE |
| | CONFIRM INFORMATION REQUIRED. IF THESE SHEETS ARE |
| | REQUIRED, PLEASE REVISE THE SITEWORK PERMIT SO THAT THE |
| | TWO ARE THE SAME. |
| | |
| | |
