Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 06111067
Permit Number 06111067
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 15
Notes
Date Text
2009-08-02 12:02:17** DENIED REVIEW OF REVISIONS FOR FINAL **
  
 FINAL REVISIONS SUBMITTED FOR SPRING HILL SUITES.
  
 1) NOTE: IN THE INITIAL AND SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS
 SUBMITTED CIRCUITING ON PLANS FOR LIGHTING, RECEPTACLES
 AND OTHER ITEMS ARE GONE OVER FOR GENERAL MINIMUM CODE
 COMPLIANCE FOR LOADS, SIZING OF BRANCH CIRCUITS ETC.
 THE ACTUAL CIRCUITING IS ALWAYS KNOWN AS AN ITEM WHICH
 WILL BE REVISED DURING THE PROJECT BY THE ELECTRICAL
 CONTRACTOR. ALL FINAL PLANS SUBMITTED AS RECORD
 DOCUMENTS NEED TO HAVE ALL CIRCUITING UPDATED AND
 COORDINATED. THE LOADS NEED TO BE REVISED AS WELL AS
 OVER CURRENT PROTECTION ETC AS NEEDED. THE FOLLOWING
 NOTES ARE BASED ON MANY ITEMS ON PLANS WHICH DO NOT
 COORDINATE.
  
 ** PLEASE SEE 408.4 IN THE NEC. THIS IS THE SECTION FOR
 MANY OF THE NOTES BELOW WITH RESPECT TO CIRCUITING AND
 PANEL SCHEDULE INCONSISTENCIES.
 ALL CIRCUITING IS TO BE SPECIFIC TO ROOMS AND AREAS IN
 WHICH THEY FEED. THE USE OF *RECEPTACLES* OR *LIGHTING*
 IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. ALPHA AND/OR NUMERIC DESIGNATIONS
 MAY BE USED FOR LOCATIONS. A DESCRIPTION SUCH AS *
 LOBBY RECEPTS EAST* OR ROOM 101 LIGHTS, ROOM 117
 RECEPTS OR OTHER TYPES OF DESIGNATIONS IS ACCEPTABLE.
 STATING *RECEPTACLES*, *LIGHTING* COULD MEAN ANY
 RECEPTACLES OR LIGHTING ANYWHERE IN THE BUILDING.
  
 THERE ARE ALSO ITEMS WHICH WERE REVISED DURING THE
 PROJECT WHICH WERE NOT INDICATED AS BEING A REVISION.
 SOME ARE NOW SHOWN NOT MEETING MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE.
 THERE ARE ALSO NOTES BELOW FOR THESE ITEMS.
  
 ***** IMPORTANT ******
 PLEASE BE AWARE THAT MANY EXAMPLES WILL BE GIVEN BELOW
 HOWEVER IT SHOULD BE KNOWN THAT THESE ARE ONLY EXAMPLES
 AND NOT *ALL* ITEMS WHICH DO NOT COORDINATE. THERE ARE
 MANY OTHER ITEMS/CIRCUITS NOT NOTED. REVIEW IS NOT
 BASED ON A COMPLETE *PUNCH-LIST* OF ALL CIRCUITING
 WHICH NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.
  
 2) NOTE: ORIGINAL PLANS INCLUDING THIS SET OF PLANS
 INDICATES J-BOXES AT MANY LOCATIONS SUCH AS EXTERIOR
 DOORS, STAIRS, AND OTHER LOCATIONS FOR *ACCESS CONTROL
 SYSTEM* ALSO KNOWN AS CARD READER SYSTEM TO BE BY
 OTHERS. KEY NOTES #8 ON E001 AND KEYNOTE #1 ON E401 ARE
 EXAMPLES OF TWO LOCATIONS OF THESE NOTES.
 TO DATE OF THIS REVIEW NO PERMIT APPLICATION, PLANS OR
 REVIEW FOR CARD READER ACCESS CONTROLS SYSTEM FOR THIS
 LOCATION AS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. THERE ARE NOTES
 ON PLANS WHICH MENTION ACCESS CONTROLS AND SOME
 CONNECTIONS TO THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HOWEVER IT IS ALSO
 NOTED TO BE DONE BY OTHERS.
 REVIEW FOR LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS PER NFPA-101
 CHAPTER 7 AND OTHER APPLICABLE CODES HAS NOT BEEN DONE.
  
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE E-401. PLEASE SEE BREAK ROOM WHICH
 INDICATES TWU-1 CIRCUITED TO H1 1,3, HOWEVER PANEL
 SCHEDULE FOR THIS IS SHOWN AS SPARE.
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE H1 SCHEDULE AS ALL TWU1 AND TWU2
 UNITS NOTED ON CIRCUITS 2-32 NEED TO BE SPECIFIC TO
 ROOMS/LOCATIONS.
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE E-401. PLEASE SEE OTHER EQUIPMENT
 IN THIS AREA SUCH AS CONDENSER PUMP FOR FCU#4 WHICH IS
 NOTED TO CIRCUIT M1-7, YET THE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR THIS
 SAME CIRCUIT IS FOR FCU#5.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE E-401. FCU#4 SHOWN AS M1-1,3,5 YET
 PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATES THIS AS ONLY CIRCUIT 1,3. IS
 THIS A 2-POLE OR 3-POLE UNIT? THIS MAY ALSO AFFECT LOAD
 CALCULATIONS DEPENDING ON UNIT.
  
 7) NOTE: THE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR POOL PANEL *P* STATES
 MANY ITEMS AS *FUTURE* AND WHEN PERMITTING FOR BUILDING
 THIS WAS THE CASE. HOWEVER AT THIS TIME THE POOL PERMIT
 HAS BEEN DONE AND CIRCUITING SHOULD BE KNOWN. SEE NEXT
 COMMENT.
 WHAT ABOUT ACTUAL POOL LIGHT FIXTURES?
  
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SITE LIGHTING PLAN E-001 WHICH
 INDICATES POOL LIGHTS AS CIRCUITS 1,3, YET THE PANEL
 SCHEDULE SHOWS THIS AS BEING A PUMP AND NOT LIGHTS.
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SHEET E102 AND PANEL SCHEDULE
 SHEETS AS THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS WHICH NEED TO BE
 UPDATED. SHEET E102 SHOWS TYPICAL HOWEVER MANY OF THE
 ROOMS AND LOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN ACCURATE ON PANEL
 SCHEDULE. 408.4, 310.16, 220 ETC
  
 A) SHEET 102, ROOM *28, INDICATES H*55, 57 YET THE
 PANEL SCHEDULE FOR H5 55,57 INDICATES ROOM 527.
  
 B) SHEET 102, ROOM *11 INDICATES H* 22,24, YET THE
 PANEL SCHEDULE FOR H5 22,24 IS FOR ROOM 512.
  
 **THIS IS THE SAME FOR ALL ROOMS AND ALL LOCATIONS. THE
 TYPICAL ROOM DESIGNATIONS ARE NOT ACCURATE.
  
 C) SHEET E102, ROOM *24, INDICATES R*-127, 12. YET THE
 PANEL SCHEDULE FOR R5, CIRCUIT #12 FOR EXAMPLE
 INDICATES COFFEE RECEPTACLE IN ROOM 504. THIS IS THE
 OTHER END OF THE FLOOR.
 ROOM #504 DOES NOT SHOW ANY OF THESE CIRCUITS.
  
 D) SHEET E102, CIRCUIT R5-122, 124 ON PLANS ROOM *523,
 YET PANEL SCHEDULE FOR R5-122,124 IS FOR ROOM 524.
  
 10) NOTE: SHEET E 105. THERE ARE SEVERAL CIRCUITS NOTED
 TO A PANEL M-4, HOWEVER NOT PANEL M-4 WAS SUBMITTED.
  
 A) PLEASE SEE M5-24 ON PLANS WHICH ARE FOR A RECEPTACLE
 AT RTU YET THE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR M5-24 MENTIONS A/C
 #7.
  
 B) PLEASE SEE NUMEROUS CIRCUITS ON THESE SAME SHEETS
 FOR SIGNAGE ALL SHOWN TO A PANEL M-4 YET NONE OF THESE
 CAN BE CONFIRMED. CIRCUITING FOR LOADS, OVER CURRENT
 PROTECTION ETC CAN NOT BE CONFIRMED MEETING MINIMUM
 CODE COMPLIANCE. **PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE SIGN PERMIT
 APPLICATIONS ARE SPECIFIC LOADS CAN BE LOCATED AND NEED
 TO BE PLACED INTO LOAD CALCULATIONS AS WELL AS PANEL
 SCHEDULES.
  
 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE E401, LOBBY RECEPTACLE CIRCUITS
 R-152, R-150 STATED AS * RECEPTACLES*. THIS IS ONE
 EXAMPLE OF ITEMS WHICH NEED TO BE SPECIFIC. THERE ARE
 DOZENS OF OTHERS.
  
 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SAME SHEET E401, FOR CIRCUIT R-101
 WHICH IS IN THE *MARKET AREA* ON PLANS. HOWEVER PLEASE
 SEE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR THIS SAME CIRCUIT, IT IS SHOWN
 AS A *SPARE CIRCUIT*?
  
 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM LIGHTING ON
 CIRCUIT R1-7. THIS CIRCUIT IS NOW CONNECTED TO OTHER
 LIGHTING FEEDING OTHER ROOMS SUCH AS STORAGE ROOMS,
 CORRIDOR, AND OTHER LOCATIONS. IN FACT THE OTHER
 LIGHTING CIRCUIT R-128 IS CONNECTED?
 IN ORIGINAL REVIEWS DATED 1/7/07 REVIEW NOTE #17 AND
 REVIEW DATED 4/5/2007 NOTE #19 GAVE CODE SECTIONS
 REQUIRING DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUITS FOR ELEVATOR
 MACHINE ROOM. THE PLANS WERE REVISED TO SHOW THE
 LIGHTING IN THIS ROOM AS BEING CONNECTED TO THE
 DEDICATED CIRCUIT. A REVISION SUBMITTED IN MARCH OF
 2008 DID NOT INDICATE ANY REVISION FOR THIS SAME ROOM
 YET THE LIGHTING WAS REVISED TO SHOW IT BEING CONNECTED
 TO OTHER LIGHTING. AS THE REVISION WAS NOT INDICATED IT
 WAS NOT PICKED UP BY THIS REVIEWER UNTIL THIS REVIEW.
 PLEASE CORRECT AND UPDATE CIRCUITING FOR THESE ITEMS
 PER 620. 22,23,24,25. ETC
 ** PLEASE BE AWARE OF ANY ITEMS NOT UNDER THE REVIEW OF
 THIS JURISDICTION WHICH IS UNDER THE INSPECTION OF THE
 STATE OF FLORIDA. ASME-17 CODE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 ** ELEVATOR PITS, ELEVATOR LANDINGS, ELEVATOR MACHINE
 ROOMS. CALL TO GO OVER AS THIS IS GIVEN FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY AND NOT PART OF THIS AHJ REVIEW.
 ASME-17 IS HOWEVER ADOPTED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 AS A REFERENCED STANDARD/CODE.
 THIS MAY OR MAY AFFECT FINAL ELEVATOR INSPECTION.
  
 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SHEET E402, WALL PACK LIGHT
 FIXTURE. SHOWN TO M-48, HOWEVER M PANEL SCHEDULE ONLY
 GOES UP TO 42.
 THIS IS THE SAME AS LATEST REVISED E102
  
 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE E402 IN THIS SAME AREA AS NOTED IN
 #14 ABOVE. HALLWAY LIGHTING NOTED TO R-145, HOWEVER
 PANEL SCHEDULE FOR R-145 INDICATES THIS CIRCUIT FOR
 PYLON SIGN.
  
 16) NOTE: PLEASE REVISE VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS. THE
 ACTUAL KNOWN VOLTAGE DROP SHOULD BE COMPLETE AT THIS
 TIME. THE CALCULATIONS ON SHEETE501 WERE NEVER UPDATED
 WHEN MOST OF THE FEEDERS WERE UPDATED TO ALUMINUM.
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 RTU-1, SHOWN AS 2/0 COPPER ON CALCULATIONS YET THE MDP
 SHOWS 4/0 ALUM.
 M-5 SHOWS 1/0 ON CALCULATIONS YET THE MDP SHOWS 3/0
 ALUM.
 H-5 SHOWS 500MCM ON CALCULATIONS AS THERE WAS A
 SUBSTANTIAL DISTANCE HOWEVER THE MDP SCHEDULE HAS THESE
 AS 300MCM ALUM. THIS IS OF CONCERN BASED ON THE
 DISTANCE. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATION FOR FEEDER AS WELL
 AS FARTHEST BRANCH CIRCUIT ON THIS PANEL.
 FBC 13-413.1ABC.1, 13-413.1.ABC.1.1, 13-413.1.ABC.1.2
  
 17) NOTE: PLEASE UPDATE ALL LOADS ON E501 FOR HOUSE
 LOADS. THERE ARE SEVERAL WHICH ARE NOT ACCURATE. THE
 FOLLOWING ARE SOME EXAMPLES IN WHICH LOADS ARE MUCH
 MORE THAN SHOWN.
  
 FOR EXAMPLE: HOUSE LIGHTING LOADS FOR R5 IS SHOWN AS
 1.4KW TOTAL. HOWEVER PLEASE SEE R-5 SCHEDULE AS
 CIRCUITS 157,158,159 ARE ALL GREATER THAN THE 1.4.
  
 FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE HOUSE LIGHTING LOADS ON PANEL
 R-4 WHICH INDICATES A TOTAL OF 1.4KW ONCE AGAIN. PLEASE
 SEE R-4 PANEL SCHEDULE AS CIRCUITS 148,150,152,163 AND
 165 ARE MUCH HIGHER. IN FACT JUST THESE ALONE ARE
 5.4KW.
  
 THE ABOVE MAY NOT SEEM TO BE MUCH HOWEVER PLEASE SEE
 R3, R2, R1. THESE ARE ALSO HIGHER ON PANEL SCHEDULES.
  
 FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE M1 HOUSE LIGHTING LOADS. THIS
 IS SHOWN AS *0*. THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE WHEN SHEET E 402
 AS NOTED ABOVE HAS LIGHTING BEING SHOWN ON PLANS TO M-1
 PANEL FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTS.
  
 18) NOTE: PLEASE UPDATE ANY FIXTURE SCHEDULES SUCH AS
 LIGHTING WHICH HAS BEEN REVISED DURING THE PROJECT. ANY
 DECREASES IN WATTAGE DESIGN WOULD NOT REQUIRE UPDATED
 LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS. ANY INCREASES WOULD
 REQUIRE UPDATED CALCULATIONS.
 FOR EXAMPLE: SITE LIGHTING FIXTURES ON OTHER LOCATION
 *HOMEWOOD SUITES * HAD FIXTURES INCREASE FROM 450WATT
 TO 1000WATT. THIS WOULD REQUIRE UPDATED CALCULATIONS.
  
  
 *** PER DIRECTOR PLANS ARE NO LONGER RELEASED. ONLY ONE
 SET MAY BE SIGNED OUT IF NEEDED.
  
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT
 TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO
 CONTACT THIS REVIEWER.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved