| Date |
Text |
| 2007-01-09 09:48:36 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 06110868 |
| | ADD: 530 HIBISCUS ST |
| | CONT: CENTEX CONSTRUCTION |
| | TEL: (561)478-0381 |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 1STREVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2 ) FL S S 713.13 |
| | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED |
| | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2) |
| | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS |
| | NOT ACTUALLY |
| | COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE |
| | RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. |
| | |
| | 3)SHEET A020NT CODE TOWER COMPLIANCE, |
| | (2) THE PLANS INDICATE MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE |
| | !-B FOR B-BLOCK PARKING GARAGE. |
| | PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT THE RETAIL STORES OF "B" BLOCK |
| | AND THE "B" BLOCK |
| | PARKING GARAGE ARE CONSIDERED "ONE" SINGLE BUILDING. |
| | WHEN BUILT THE RETAIL |
| | SHOPS CAME IN UNDER ONE PERMIT AND THE PARKING GARAGE |
| | BEING AN ADDITION TO |
| | THE BASE BUILDING UNDER A SECOND PERMIT. THE KEY ISSUE |
| | ONE BUILDING VERSES |
| | TWO BUILDINGS IS WHERE THE ADDITION ADJOINS TO THE BASE |
| | BUILDING. |
| | THE CONNECTION BEING WIDER THAN 30 FEETMAKES THIS |
| | ONE BUILDING, SEE THE DEFINITION |
| | OF WALKWAY COVERED. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE SQ. FOOTAGE FOR BOTH THE |
| | PARKING GARAGE AND THE RETAIL STORES |
| | (FOOTPRINT) THEN THE MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION TYPE WILL |
| | TRUELY BE ABLE TO BE DETERMINED. |
| | TABLE 503. |
| | PLEASE REVISE THE DEESCRIPTION OF WORK ON THE |
| | PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION O REFLECT THIS IS MORE THAN AN ADDITION TO |
| | JUST "B" PARKING FACILITY. |
| | |
| | 4)THIS ADDITION OF THE ELEVATOR TOWER AND THE COVERED |
| | WALKWAY ARE CONSIDERD ADDITIONS TO |
| | A EXISTING THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING (3) SETS OF |
| | PLANS, REPORTS AND ALL SUBMITTALS. 106.1.2*. |
| | |
| | 5)FL S. S. 553.71(7) " THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDING" MEANING ANY BUILDING WHICH IS |
| | GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT IN |
| | HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPAN |
| | CY CLASSIFICATION AS DEINED IN THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS |
| | 5,000 SQ FT IN AREA AND AN OCCUPANT |
| | CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 PERSONS. |
| | 105.13.1 THE ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO PERFORM |
| | STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDING PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL |
| | INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY THE |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL |
| | INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE |
| | ENFORCING AGENCY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE |
| | OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. |
| | THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURL INSPECTION |
| | PLAN IS TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION |
| | PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO THAT THE |
| | BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FORCOMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 6)WPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A |
| | SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY S. |
| | 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE MIN- |
| | IMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. |
| | CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER OF THE |
| | SPECIAL INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561) |
| | 805-6711 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION BEFORE |
| | THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 7)W.P.B. AMENDMENT 105.13.4.4 ALL |
| | PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE |
| | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CON- |
| | TAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE BEST OF |
| | THE ARCHITECT'S PR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, |
| | THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH |
| | THE APPLICABLE FIRE-SAFETY STANDARDS AS |
| | DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND 633 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 8)FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE |
| | SOILS, WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY IS |
| | NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION. |
| | WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL |
| | IS NOT DEFINITLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE EXPLOR- |
| | ATIONS, TEST OR OTHER ADEQUATE PROOF AS |
| | TO THE PERMISSIBLE SAFE BEARING |
| | CAPACITY. REQUIRED TEST AND RECOMMENDA- |
| | TIONS SUBMITTED TO VERIFY BEARING CAPA- |
| | CITY SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A GEOTECH- |
| | NICAL REPORT FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| | PROPERLY LICENSED IN THE STATE OF |
| | FLORIDA. |
| | |
| | 9) 106.3.5*MINIMUM PLAN CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS |
| | |
| | 9A) 106.3.5.1 .1(1)SITE PLAN LOCATION OF BUILDING AND |
| | ADDITION POSITIONED ON LOT. |
| | |
| | 9B) 106.3.5.1.1(8) WIND REQUIREMENTS |
| | 2004 FL. BLD CODE 1603.1.4 |
| | THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND |
| | SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION |
| | DRAWINGS, |
| | 1)- BASIC WIND SPEED, MPH |
| | 2)- WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR, & BUILDING |
| | CATEGORY |
| | 3)- WIND EXPOSURE |
| | 4)- INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT, |
| | 5)- COMPONENTS & CLADDING, THE DESIGN |
| | WIND PRESSURES IN TERMS OF PSF. |
| | |
| | 9C) 106.3.5.1.1(10) SITE REQUIREMENTS, ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING @NEW ELEVATOR.SHEET A5.91NT DETAIL# 2 |
| | GROUND FLOOR. THIS DETAIL INDICATES ELEVATORS 10 & 11 A |
| | VESTIBULE AND A DOUBLE DOOR EGRESS & EXIT, THERE IS NO |
| | COMMUNICATION WITH THE "B" BLOCK PARKING GARAGE |
| | INDICATING THE PROPOSED PARKING LAYOUT FOR ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING, VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND HOW THE DISSABLED |
| | WILL GAIN ENTRY TO THE NEW ELEVATOR TOWER WITHOUT BEING |
| | FORCED TO TRAVEL BEIND PARKED CARS. |
| | 11-4.1.2(5) (B) VAN ACCESIBLE |
| | 11-4.6.5 VERTICAL CLEARENCE |
| | 11-4.6.2 LOCATION, SHORTEST ROUTE. |
| | 11-4.6.2(1) ACCESSIBLE ROUTE NO LESS |
| | THAN 44" SO THAT USERS WILL NOT BE |
| | COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND PARKED CARS. |
| | 11-4.3.2(1) ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, WILL A CURB CUT BE |
| | NECESSARY TO CROSS THE DRIVE TO THE TOWER DIRECTLY TO |
| | THE SOUTH? |
| | DETAIL 1& 2 ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO THE TRANSITION? |
| | |
| | 10)A5.92NT ELEVATOR ELEVATIONS: THE ELEVATION NOR DO |
| | THE PROVIDED |
| | STRUCTURAL SHEETS PROVIDE THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE |
| | PRESSURES THAT WILL OCCUR |
| | ON THIS STRUCTURE, NOR ARE THE END ZONES INDICATED. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THIS |
| | INFORMATION, THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED CAN NOT BE |
| | EVALUATED |
| | WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION AT THIS TIME.I BELIEVE |
| | THERE WAS A WIND TUNNEL TEST |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE (3) SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENTS. |
| | 1609.1.1 DETERMINATION OF WIND LOADS. |
| | |
| | 11) A5.92NT ALSO INDICATES THE USE OF PRECAST CONCRETE |
| | CROWN |
| | MOLDS PLEASE PROVIDE THE ATTACHMENT METHOD. |
| | SEE SECTION 1406.2.2. |
| | |
| | 12)SHEET A5.92NT PROVIDES THE ONLY SIDEVIEW |
| | INFORMATION FOR THE |
| | NEW EXTERIOR STAIRS, THE PLANS FAIL TO PROVIDE DETAILS |
| | FOR STAIRS,LANDINGS AND GAURDRAIL SYSTEMS.SECTION |
| | 1009 & 1012. |
| | |
| | 13) SHEET A5.91NT DETAIL# 6 ELEVATOR ROOM ROOF PLAN |
| | INDICATES |
| | ONLY ONE THROUGH THE WALL SCUPPER FOR ROOF DRAINAGE, |
| | PLANS ARE |
| | MISSING AN EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SCUPPERS.DETAIL # 3 OF |
| | THE SAME SHEET |
| | (ELECTRICAL ROOM) HAS THE SAME ISSUE. SEE 1503.4.3. |
| | 1503.4.3 |
| | WHEN OTHER MEANS OF DRAINAGE OF OVERFLOW WATER IS NOT |
| | PROVIDED, OVERFLOW SCUPPERS SHALL BE PLACED IN WALLS OR |
| | PARAPETS NOT LESS THAN 2 INCHES (51 MM) NOR MORE THAN 4 |
| | INCHES (102 MM) ABOVE THE FINISHED ROOF COVERING AND |
| | SHALL BE LOCATED AS CLOSE AS PRACTICAL TO REQUIRED |
| | VERTICAL LEADERS OR DOWNSPOUTS OR WALL AND PARAPET |
| | SCUPPERS. AN OVERFLOW SCUPPER SHALL BE SIZED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, PLUMBING. |
| | |
| | 14)SHEET A5.81NT : |
| | 14A) DETAIL# 2 INDICATES A SECTION OR DETAIL# (6) BUT |
| | THERE IS NO DETAIL# (6), THIS APPEARS TO BE A MISSPRINT |
| | DETAIL# (7).. |
| | 14B) DETAIL# 2 INDICATES A SECTION OR DETAIL#(4) IS |
| | THIS AREA A ENCLOSED PART OF THE BUILDING OR IS THIS |
| | AREA A OPEN COURTYARD? |
| | 14C) THE DETAIL# 5 INDICATES THE FRAMING MEMBERS |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE TRANSLUCENT POLYCARBONATE ROOF PANELS |
| | (NOA 05-11207.01), THIS DETAIL |
| | DOES NOT MATCH THE FRAMING MEMBERS OF HOW THIS SYSTEM |
| | WAS TESTED NOR SPANS WHICH THE SYSTEM WAS TESTED. THE |
| | SECOND ISSUE WITH THIS DETAIL IS NOTE# 3 INSTEAD OF |
| | USING ALUMINIUM FRAMING, HOW THE SYSTEM WAS TESTED |
| | THERE IS AN ALTERNATE FOR STEEL FRAMING IN THE PLANS |
| | THAT DOESN'T SHOW IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. PROVIDE |
| | FURTHER INFORMATION FOR RATIONAL ANYLSIS OR |
| | CALCULATIONS? |
| | 14D) THENOA SUPPLIED IS BASICALLY THE FRAMEWORK FOR A |
| | SKYLIGHT, THE DESIGNER OF RECORD HASN'T PROVIDED HOW |
| | THIS UNIT IS TO BE ATTACHED TO EITHER |
| | THE THE EXISTING WALLS OR HOW THE HORIZONTAL AND |
| | VERTICAL FRAMING MEMBERS ARE TO BE ATTACHEDOR THE |
| | BOTTOM PLATE TO THE ALUMINIUM COLUMNS NOR |
| | THE BASE PLATE TO CONCRETE DECK? CONTINIOUS LOAD PATH, |
| | MOMENT OF OVERTURNING, MAIN WIND FORCE RESISTING |
| | SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 15) THE ROOFING REPORT SUBMITTED FOR MODIFIED INDICATES |
| | A MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE OF -105, WITHOUT THE WIND |
| | TUNNEL TEST AND THE PRESSURE ZONES LISTED FOR THIS |
| | BUILDING WE WOULD BE GUESSING ON THE PRESSURES! |
| | |
| | 16) SINCE THIS IS AN ADDITION, PLANS NEED TO BE |
| | REVIEWED FOR IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT. |
| | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE |
| | ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| | BEACH CO.,THE PERMIT PLANS STAMPED BY |
| | THEM AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
