| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-06 18:21:45 | 2007-07-06 18:21:45 |
| | NOTE ADDED: |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE KNOW , NO FURTHER ELECTRICAL REVIEWS OF |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL BE DONE UNTIL A MEETING IS |
| | HELD WITH THE DESIGNERS OF RECORD. THESE NOTES WILL |
| | NEED TO BE GONE OVER AT THAT TIME TO ALLEAVIATE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONFUSION OF ANYKIND. |
| 2007-07-06 16:43:50 | 2007-07-06 18:21:45 |
| | NOTE ADDED: |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE KNOW , NO FURTHER ELECTRICAL REVIEWS OF |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL BE DONE UNTIL A MEETING IS |
| | HELD WITH THE DESIGNERS OF RECORD. THESE NOTES WILL |
| | NEED TO BE GONE OVER AT THAT TIME TO ALLEVIATE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONFUSION OF ANYKIND. |
| | THIS WAS CONFIRMED WITH THE ASSISTANT BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| | AFTER REVIEW OF SAID ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2007-07-06 16:43:50 |
| | ** UNSAT 6TH REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTES DATED 6/29/07 WHICH STATED |
| | THIS OFFICE WAS GOING TO PLACE REVIEW INTO A *TEMPORARY |
| | FAILED STATUS*. THIS WAS TO ALLOW REVISED CORRECTED |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO BE BROUGHT IN AS A SUBMITTAL |
| | UNDER THE CORRECT VERSION AS LONG AS NO CHANGES WERE |
| | MADE TO THE CALCULATIONS THEMSELVES. |
| | ON TUESDAY JULY 3RD 2007 REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | WERE BROUGHT IN AS A SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. UPON A |
| | QUICK GLANCE TO THE CALCULATIONS IT WAS NOTICED THE |
| | VERSION WAS NOW STATED UNDER JULY 05 2.0 VERSION WHICH |
| | WAS BEFORE THE PREVIOUS CODE CHANGE. (PLEASE SEE THE |
| | FBC CHANGED AS OF OCT 1ST, 2005 OF THAT YEAR). THIS |
| | REVIEWER PLACED CALL TO THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD |
| | NOTIFYING OF THE INCORRECT VERSION. WE THEN CALLED THE |
| | PERSON WHICH WAS PROVIDING THE CALCULATIONS. |
| | THIS OFFICE SPECIFICALLY INFORMED BOTH DESIGNERS THAT |
| | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS NUMBERS WERE OK, HOWEVER NEEDED |
| | TO BE UNDER THE 2.1 VERSION AS PREVIOUSLY STATED IN THE |
| | REVIEWS. |
| | THIS OFFICE WAS INFORMED THAT REVISED ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS WITH THE CORRECT VERSION WOULD BE |
| | SUBMITTED BY 7/06/07. |
| | PLEASE SEE NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE ONCE AGAIN |
| | BROUGHT IN BY THE PERMIT EXPEDITOR AS A SUBMITTAL AND |
| | NO FEE WAS CHARGED ON 7/06/07. |
| | PLEASE SEE THIS TIME THE VERSION WAS CORRECT HOWEVER |
| | THE NUMBERS IN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH WERE OK ON |
| | THE PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS HAVE ONCE AGAIN BEEN CHANGED |
| | AND DO NOT MATCH AND CORRELATE WITH PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.A, 13-415.2 |
| | |
| | ** THIS REVIEW IS DENIED, ONE COPY OF EACH THE |
| | SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE BEING RETAINED BY |
| | THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS: PLEASE CORRELATE THE |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS WITH THE PLANS. PLEASE TAKE THE |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR ELECTRICAL LIGHTING FROM THE VERSION |
| | 3.0 WHICH WAS SUBMITTED AND TRANSFER THAT INFORMATION |
| | INTO THE CORRECT VERSION OF 2.1. |
| | THE NUMBER OF LUMINARIES, THE WATTAGE OF LUMINARIES |
| | |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
