| Date |
Text |
| 2006-12-11 14:40:55 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 06110349 |
| | ADD: 5720 PREMIER PARK DR. BLDG# 3 |
| | CONT: "PLAN REVIEW" |
| | TEL: (954)214-4039 ANDY PRIBY |
| | |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 1STREVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2)FL S S 713.13 |
| | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED |
| | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2) |
| | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS |
| | NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED |
| | WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING |
| | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. |
| | |
| | 3)FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE |
| | SOILS, WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY IS |
| | NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION. |
| | WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL |
| | IS NOT DEFINITLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE EXPLOR |
| | ATIONS, TEST OR OTHER ADEQUATE PROOF AS |
| | TO THE PERMISSIBLE SAFE BEARING |
| | CAPACITY. REQUIRED TEST AND RECOMMENDA- |
| | TIONS SUBMITTED TO VERIFY BEARING CAPA- |
| | CITY SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A GEOTECH- |
| | NICALREPORT FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| | PROPERLY LICENSED IN THE STATE OF |
| | FLORIDA. |
| | |
| | 4 A) FBC* 105.3RESIDENT INSPECTOR. |
| | SUBMIT INSPECTOR RESUME' AND LICENSE |
| | DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, DIRECTOR OF |
| | THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A |
| | RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, |
| | ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO ONE OR MORE OF |
| | THE FOLLOWING: |
| | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II |
| | CONSTRUCTION |
| | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS |
| | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE |
| | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE |
| | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI |
| | - PILE DRIVING |
| | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA |
| | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT |
| | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN |
| | OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION |
| | |
| | 4B) SINCE THIS BUILDING WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT |
| | INSPECTOR |
| | (3) SETS OF PLANS, REPORTS, AND OR OTHER REQUIRED |
| | SUBMITTALS |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET A-0 CODE ANALYSIS: |
| | |
| | 5A) CONSTRUCTION TYPE: PLANS INDICATE A BUILDING TYPE |
| | IV(UNPROTECTED) |
| | THIS TERMINOLGY IS FROM THE 2001 FBC PLEASE CORRECT, |
| | UNDER THE CORRENT |
| | CODE THIS BUILDING IS TO BE BUILT AS "HEAVY TIMBER" |
| | CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 5B)IT APPEARS THAT THE CODE ANYLSIS IS A COMBINATION |
| | OF ZONING & BUILDING. |
| | PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS |
| | 302,092 WHEREAS |
| | ON SHEET A-1 BUILDING NUMBER 1 INDICATES THE SQ FT AREA |
| | TO BE 119,291 SQ FT. |
| | ALSO FURTHER DOWN THE PAGE BUILDING # 1 INDICATES |
| | GROUND FLOOR AREA TO BE |
| | 95,391 AND POSSIBLE MEZZANINE LEVEL OF 23,900 SQ. FT. |
| | FOR THE PURPOSE OF |
| | BUILDING PLANS EITHER YOU ARE GOING TO BUILD THE |
| | MEZZANINE LEVEL UNDER THIS PERMIT |
| | WHICH WILL INCLUDE THIS FIGURE, IF NOTTO BE BUILT |
| | UNDER THIS PERMIT DO NOT INCLUDE IT. |
| | |
| | 5C) IN EITHER CASE PLEASE IDENTIFY THE MINIMUM BUILDING |
| | TYPE AND IF IN TABLE 503 |
| | THE PLANS ARE OVER THE ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE, |
| | INDICATE ANY INCREASES |
| | TAKEN AND ALSO SHOW CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 5D) THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS BLANK WHERE THE |
| | DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT, |
| | OR WORK TO BE COVERED UNDER THIS PERMIT. FOR THE |
| | PURPOSES OF THIS REVIEW |
| | THIS BUILDING WILL BE CONSIDERED A SHELL BUILDING |
| | PERMIT. TENANT BUILD-OUTS TO BE UNDER |
| | SEPERATE PERMITS. |
| | |
| | 5E) IS THIS SITE, ARE THE UNITS TO BE SOLD AS |
| | CONDOMINIUMS? |
| | |
| | 5F) THE CODE ANALYSIS ALSO INDICATED THAT THIS IS TO BE |
| | A FIRE SPRINKLERED |
| | BUILDING BUT NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS , HYDROLICS,FIRE |
| | PUMP OR FIRE PUMP CONTROLLERE |
| | WERE SUBMITTED.FOR A BUILDING PERMIT TO BE ISSUED |
| | FORMINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA |
| | 106.3.51.1(4)* FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | 903.2.3 GROUP F-1. |
| | AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | THROUGHOUT ALL BUILDINGS |
| | CONTAINING A GROUP F-1 OCCUPANCY WHERE ONE OF THE |
| | FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXISTS: |
| | 1.WHERE A GROUP F-1 FIRE AREA EXCEEDS 12,000 SQUARE |
| | FEET (1115 M 2 ). |
| | |
| | 6)SHEET A-6: |
| | |
| | 6A) SHEET A-6 , DISCREPANCY, |
| | THE ELEVATIONS INDICATES DO NOT INDICATE THE PRESSURE |
| | ZONES. |
| | |
| | 7)FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, |
| | PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- |
| | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT |
| | TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS |
| | FOLLOWS: |
| | A) STOREFRONT WINDOWS |
| | B) MULLIONS |
| | C) SKYLIGHTS |
| | D) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS |
| | E) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS |
| | F) ROLL UP DOORS |
| | G) LOUVERS |
| | H) EFIS SYSTEMS |
| | I) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES |
| | |
| | 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. |
| | IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR |
| | GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE |
| | IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN |
| | BUILDINGS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE |
| | OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF GLAZED |
| | OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING |
| | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH |
| | GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE |
| | IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH AN |
| | IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND |
| | ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE TAS 201, 202 |
| | AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: |
| | 1.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 |
| | FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. |
| | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN |
| | 30 FEET (9.1 M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET |
| | THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE |
| | TEST. |
| | |
| | 8)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 |
| | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION |
| | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS |
| | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- |
| | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE |
| | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE |
| | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 9)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 10) THIS SUBMITTAL DOESN'T INCORORATE ANY ROOFING |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | HERE IS A LIST OF COMMON ISSUES THAT WILL FAIL A |
| | ROOFING REPORT SUBMITTAL: |
| | THIS ROOF IS MISSING OR NOT INCOMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FOLLOW ITEMS: |
| | |
| | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN |
| | |
| | ROOF HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE ROOF |
| | PITCH. |
| | |
| | ___ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH |
| | SYSTEM OR SUBSYSTEM WILL BE USED. |
| | |
| | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW |
| | PRESSURE FOR ZONE ___ . |
| | |
| | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES |
| | LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD THE FASTENER |
| | RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT |
| | REQUIRED, AS DETERMINED BY THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED |
| | FASTENER SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED |
| | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED |
| | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF |
| | CONSULTANT MAY BE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ___THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES |
| | LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCED |
| | FASTENING ALLOWED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 11) SHEET A-8 PRECAST MOULDING DETAIL IS MISSING DETAIL |
| | REFRENCE NUMBER. |
| | FOUND ON SHEET A-15 DETAIL # 7. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS WITH SAFETY |
| | FACTOR FOR THE SECURING THIS WEIGHT IN THIS |
| | MANNER.106.1.2*ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 12)SHEET A-11 DETAIL # 3 INDICATES THE FIRE PUMP ROOM |
| | TO ALSO BE USED AS ASTORAGE ROOM? |
| | |
| | 13) SHEET A-11 VARIOUS DETAILS INDICATE THE TRIANGLE |
| | AREA CREATED BY THE RISER AND TREAD, |
| | 1012.3 LIMITS THIS AREA THA A 6"SPHERE CAN NOT PASS |
| | THROUGH. THE WORDING ON THE |
| | PLAN IS NOT CLEAR WHAT THE 6" IS FOR. |
| | |
| | 14)SHEET A-14 DEPENDING ON THE BUILDING TYPE TO BE |
| | DECLAIRED, THE PLYOOD IN THE EXTERIOR WALLS MAY BE OF |
| | CONCERN. TABLE 601 &602. |
| | |
| | 15)NOTE WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT SUBMITTED THE |
| | ROLL UP DOORS MAY OR MAY NOT REQUIRE DOOR BUCKS AND |
| | ATTACHMENT. |
| | |
| | 16)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY |
| | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT |
| | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
