| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-18 19:50:23 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. |
| | |
| | 2) ADA PARKING DETAILS DO NOT MEET CITY CODE (SHEET A3) |
| | - REPEAT COMMENT.THE DETAIL ON THE BOWYER SINGLETON |
| | PLANS SHEET 13 OF 29 IS CORRECT AND SHOULD BE USED. |
| | WHEEL STOPS AND HC SYMBOL LOCATIONS NEED CORRECTING ON |
| | A3. |
| | |
| | 3) THE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE LONE DUMPSTER BEHIND THE |
| | BUILDING IS NOT SHOWN ON BOWYER SINGLETON PLANS SHEET 9 |
| | OF 29 - PARTIAL REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 4) THE ELEVATIONS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3987-06 AND |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET A6 DO NOT MATCH THE ELEVATIONS ON SHEET |
| | A7 AND THE SECTIONS SHOWN ON SHEETS A8 AND A14 - |
| | PARTIAL REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | A. THE DOORWAY TOWERS ON SHEET A6 DO NOT ALL HAVE THE |
| | SAME SCORE LINE IN LINE WITH THE ROOF - EASTERN MOST |
| | TOWER, AND TOWER SHOWN ON NORTH AND EAST ELEVATION. |
| | |
| | B. REVISION DELTA 3 WAS NOT MADE ON SHEET A7. |
| | |
| | C. USE ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ON SHEET A6. |
| | |
| | D. SHEET A6 SHOWS CONCRETE MOLDING, BUT SECTIONS ON |
| | SHEET A8 SHOWS EIFS - THESE NEED TO SHOW SAME TYPE OF |
| | PRECAST. |
| | |
| | E. SHEET A8 SHOWS REVELS AT DIFFERENT SIZES THAN CALLED |
| | OUT ON SHEET A6 (4 INCH VS. 6 INCH). |
| | |
| | F. SHEET A8 (SECTION 4/A-8) DOES NOT SHOW THE MOLDING |
| | IN LINE WITH THE TOP OF THE BAHAMA SHUTTERS OR THE |
| | BAHAMA SHUTTERS THEMSELVES. |
| | |
| | G. SHEET A14 (SECTION DETAIL 3/A14) DOES NOT SHOW THE |
| | HORIZONTAL SCORE LINE THROUGH THE SQUARES AS THE |
| | ELEVATION SHOWN ON A6 DOES. |
| | |
| | H. WHERE ARE THE BAHAMA SHUTTER DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET A1 SHALL SHOW ALL OF THE LATEST APPROVED |
| | REVISIONS TO THE OVERALL SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 6) BOWYER SINGLETON SHEETS 3 AND 9 OF 29 ARE NOT THE |
| | MOST RECENT AS THEY STILL SHOW THE EASTERNMOST SIGN ON |
| | THE BUILDING #1 PARCEL, WHICH IS NOT APPROVED. |
| | |
| | 7) D-CURBS OR WHEEL STOPS ARE REQUIRED ALONG ALL |
| | LANDSCAPE AREAS.THE PLANS SHALL CALL OUT ALL CURBING |
| | AS SUCH. |
| | |
| | 8) A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS REQUIRED.THE ILLUMINATION |
| | SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT CANDLE AT THE BOUNDARY OF THE |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 9)MOST OF THE LIGHT POLES ARE WITHIN 5 FEET OF LIVE |
| | OAKS OR OTHER TREES.THE TREES OR THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | LIGHT POLES SHALL BE ADJUSTED SO THAT TREES TO NOT GROW |
| | INTO THE LIGHT POLES, MAKING THEM INEFFECTIVE. |
| | |
| | 10) SOME OF THE FIRE HYDRANTS CONFLICT WITH THE TREE |
| | PLACEMENT.FIRE HYDRANTS MAY NOT BE LOCATED IN THE 12' |
| | WIDE FUTURE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA. |
| | |
| | 11) NO BUILDING PERMITS WILL BE ISSUED FOR BUILDING #1 |
| | UNTIL UNTIL THE DEVELOPER FINALIZES THE PROPORTIONATE |
| | SHARE AGREEMENTS WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
| | |
| | 12) NOT ALL CONDITIONS OF ORD. NO. 3987-06 HAVE BEEN |
| | MET - REPEAT COMMENT.VERIFICATION FROM PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO RELEASE THE TRAFFIC |
| | CONDITIONS.THE USE TABLE ITEMS HAVE NOT BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | A. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL POST SURETY IN THE AMOUNT |
| | OF ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($150,000.00) |
| | WITHIN TWELVE (12) MONTHS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER |
| | (DUE BY OCTOBER 10, 2007) IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE |
| | COUNTY ATTORNEY TO ASSURE THE INSTALLATION OF THE |
| | TRAFFIC SIGNAL WHEN WARRANTED. |
| | |
| | B. AT SUCH TIME AS THE PROPERTY OWNER COMPLETES THE |
| | DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE PROJECT, THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL |
| | NOTIFY THE COUNTY'S ROADWAY PRODUCTION DIVISION IF THE |
| | PROJECT HAS ANY EXCESS STORMWATER RETENTION CAPACITY |
| | THAT CAN BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY FOR THE |
| | WIDENING OF 45TH STREET FROM TWO (2) LANES TO FOUR (4) |
| | LANES FROM HAVERHILL ROAD TO THE FLORIDA TURNPIKE.IF |
| | THERE IS EXCESS CAPACITY AVAILABLE, THE PROPERTY OWNER |
| | SHALL MAKE THAT CAPACITY AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY |
| | THROUGH THE DEDICATION OF A TWENTY FOOT (20') DRAINAGE |
| | EASEMENT FROM THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE ULTIMATE |
| | OUTFALL.THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT SHALL COVER THE ENTIRE |
| | POND. |
| | |
| | C. NO MORE THAN 1,146 NEW DAILY TRIPS MAY BE PERMITTED |
| | UNTIL CONTRACT IS LET FOR WIDENING OF HAVERHILL ROAD TO |
| | FIVE (5) LANES, FROM 45TH STREET TO CARIBBEAN |
| | BOULEVARD. |
| | |
| | D. NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT GENERATING MORE |
| | THAT 85 NEW EXTERNAL PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PRIOR TO |
| | LETTING OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE FOUR (4) LANING OF |
| | HAVERHILL ROAD, FROM BEELINE HIGHWAY TO 45TH STREET. |
| | |
| | E.NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT GENERATING MORE |
| | THAT 103 NEW EXTERNAL PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PRIOR TO |
| | LETTING OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS |
| | AT THE INTERSECTION OF HAVERHILL ROAD AND ROEBUCK |
| | ROAD: |
| | |
| | 1. ADDITION OF A SECOND EXCLUSIVE NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN |
| | LANE. |
| | |
| | 2. ADDITION OF A SECOND EXCLUSIVE EASTBOUND LEFT TURN |
| | LANE. |
| | |
| | 3. RECONFIGURE THE WESTBOUND APPROACH TO PROVIDE ONE |
| | EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANE, TWO THROUGH LANES AND ONE |
| | EXCLUSIVE RIGHT-TURN LANE. |
| | |
| | F. NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT GENERATING MORE |
| | THAN 261 NEW EXTERNAL AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS PRIOR TO THE |
| | LETTING OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE ADDITION OF A SECOND |
| | NORTHBOUND THROUGH LANE AT THE INTERSECTION OF |
| | HAVERHILL ROAD AND 45TH STREET. |
| | |
| | G. WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT ORDER (DUE BY APRIL 10, 2007), THE |
| | DEVELOPER MUST ENTER INTO A PUBLIC FACILITIES AGREEMENT |
| | (PFA) WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY TO FUND AND/OR TO |
| | CONSTRUCT ANY AND ALL IMPROVEMENTS AS THE TERM IS |
| | DEFINED BY THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ORDINANCE. |
| | THE PFA MUST BE IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE COUNTY |
| | ENGINEER.THE CITY SHALL NOT ISSUE ANY BUILDING |
| | PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT UNLESS AND UNTIL |
| | THE PFA HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY |
| | COMMISSIONERS. |
| | |
| | H. A USE CHART SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND |
| | ZONING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENTS CONCURRENT |
| | WITH ALL BUILDING PERMIT AND/OR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE |
| | APPLICATIONS STATING THE SQUARE FOOTAGE DEVOTED TO THE |
| | USES WITHIN BUILDINGS 1, 2 AND 3.THE SPECIFIC SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE USE WITHIN EACH BUILDING MAY NOT EXCEED THE |
| | ALLOWANCES OUTLINED IN THE BUILDING USE SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | TABLE (EXHIBIT F), UNLESS THE PROPERTY OWNER PROVIDES A |
| | TRAFFIC EQUIVALENCY STATEMENT, PREPARED BY A LICENSED |
| | TRAFFIC ENGINEER, DEMONSTRATING THAT THE APPROVED |
| | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY FOR THE PROJECT IS NOT EXCEEDED. |
| | |
| | I. A TRAFFIC STATEMENT, PREPARED BY A LICENSED TRAFFIC |
| | ENGINEER, SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING |
| | AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENTS CONCURRENT WITH |
| | ALL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS OUTLINING THE NUMBER |
| | OF DAILY TRIPS, AM TRIPS AND PM TRIPS GENERATED FOR |
| | EACH USE AND ITS SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH BUILDING.THE |
| | TRAFFIC STATEMENT SHALL INCLUDE THE TRIPS ASSOCIATED |
| | WITH THE SPECIFIC USE AND A CUMULATIVE TABLE FOR ALL OF |
| | THE USES APPROVED IN THE PREMIER PARK OF COMMERCE CPD. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435 |
