| Date |
Text |
| 2007-09-05 09:16:19 | BUILDING C-3 RAMP REVISION BUILDING REVIEW FIRST |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW DONE UNDER FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 1- BUILDING SIZE WAS REDUCED TO ALLOW NEW HANDICAPPED |
| | RAMP AND STAIRS, BUT DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON REVISED SURVEY |
| | DON'T MATCH DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON SHEETS A202, A304, |
| | A810, S1. REVISE AS REQUIRED ALL DIMENSIONS AND SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGES. |
| | |
| | 2- SHEET A002: REVISION IS JULY 27 OF 2006 OR 2007?. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3 SHEET A404: REVISE GRADE LINE ELEVATION AND FIRST |
| | FLOOR ELEVATION TO REPRESENT EXACT HEIGHTREQUIRED FOR |
| | THE RAMP AND STAIRS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET A521: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS AND DETAILS FOR RATED |
| | CEILING ASSEMBLY BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 7 OF FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) CLARIFY WHAT'S THE HVAC DUCTWORK FOR? ACCORDING |
| | TO PLANS THIS IS THE OUTSIDE AREA OF THE FIRST FLOOR. |
| | |
| | 5- SHEET A602.2: |
| | A) RAMP DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC. 11-4.8 FBC 2004. |
| | * DIMENSION SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN IS NOT ENOUGH TO |
| | PROVIDE THE 1:12SLOPE RATIO. |
| | ALSO, CLEARLY PROVIDE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION AT TOP AND |
| | BOTTOM OF RAMP TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH PROPOSED |
| | SLOPE. |
| | ** SHOW LANDING ON TOP AND BOTTOM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 11-4.8.4(2). |
| | *** PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTINUOUS |
| | STEEL ANGLE SHOWN ON GUARD/HANDRAIL DETAIL #06. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMETNS TO FBC 2004. |
| | **** DRAWING #07 IS A FLOOR PLAN, NOT ELEVATION. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | ***** END OF HANDRAILS NEED TO COMPLY WITH SEC. |
| | 11-4.8.5(6). |
| | |
| | B) STAIRS DON'T COMPLY WITH SEC. 11-4.9 FBC 2004. |
| | * NOSING DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC. 11-4.9.3 FBC 2004. |
| | ** FOUR RISERSAT 51/4"DON'T ADD UP TO 1'-8 3/4". |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. (ALS0, IT SAYS 5' INSTEAD OF 5". |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED). |
| | *** END OF HANDRAILS NEED TO COMPLY WITH SEC. |
| | 11-4.9.4(6) FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR NEW EXTERIOR DOOR TYPE SHOWN ON |
| | MAINTENANCE/STORAGE AREA. |
| | ***REMAINDER:DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE |
| | IN WRITING PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | |
| | REMAINDER: |
| | * PROVIDE ALLINFORMATION FOR ALL BUILDINGS IN THIS |
| | PROJECT REQUESTED ON PROVISOAT TIME OF PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE TO AVOID DELAYS OR CONFLICTS. |
| | ** PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR TRUSS PACKAGE FOR |
| | ALL BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
