| Date |
Text |
| 2007-06-07 09:13:42 | BUILDING REVIEW 4TH CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- CONTRACTOR DECLARED VALUATION IN THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION IS TOO LOW BASED ON THE PROPOSED SCOPE OF |
| | WORK.CONTRACTORTO UPDATE VALUATION OR IT WILL BE |
| | UPDATEDBASED ON ADETAILED COST ESTIMATE WHICH WILL |
| | BE TIME CONSUMING.SEC. 108.3 OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 2- THERE WAS ONLY ONE SET OF PLANS SUBMITTED. THERE |
| | WERE TWO SETS OF PLANS FOR STAIRS SUBMITTED. NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE 2 SETS OF PLANS FOR EVERYTHING. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET A-1: |
| | A) TYPICAL WALL SECTION: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS |
| | SHOWING HOW THE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL , |
| | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY AND ROOF CEILING ASSEMBLY ARE |
| | ACHIEVED BASED ON THE COMPONENTS USED. SEE COMPLETE |
| | SEC. 721.6.2. FBC 2004 TO SHOW HOW ONE HR FIRE RATING |
| | IS ACHIEVED.INFORMATION SHOWN ON PLANS SHOW 1/2" TYPE |
| | 'C' G.W.B. FOR WALLS AND 5/8" TYPE 'C' G.W.B. ON |
| | CEILINGS.ACCORDING TO MATERIALS SPECIFIED ON THIS |
| | SECTION, THE ASSEMBLIES DON'T PROVIDE THE ONE HOUR |
| | REQUIRED FIRE RATING FROM THE SIDE EXPOSED TO FIRE. |
| | ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY ALL COMPONENTS OF THE ASSEMBLY. |
| | EXISTING FLOOR OR EXISTING ROOF IS NOT ENOUGH |
| | INFORMATION TO DETERMINE A COMPLETE FIRE RATED |
| | ASSEMBLY. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) " OPTIONAL UL DESIGN #P528 CEILING AND WALL |
| | ASSEMBLY 6" BATT INSULATION METAL CHANNELS @ 12" O.C. 1 |
| | LAYER OF 5/8" GYP. BRD. TYPE 'C'"SPECIFIED AT |
| | BOTTOM OF TYP. WALL SECTION DOESN'T WORK EITHER. FIRST |
| | OF ALL THIS ASSEMBLY IS FOR A CEILING ASSEMBLY USING |
| | METAL TRUSSES. |
| | ON THE OTHER HAND, A CEILING ASSEMBLY CAN'T BE USED |
| | INTERCHANGEABLE AS A WALL ASSEMBLY AND CEILING |
| | ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | |
| | C) BUILDING CODE INFORMATION.THIS IS NOT R-1 |
| | OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | D) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW THE ROOF DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR ZONES 1, 2 AND 3 WERRE ACHIEVED. |
| | INFORMATION SUBMITTED SHOWS:ZONE 1 (FIELD) 32.3 PSF |
| | ZONE 2 (4' EDGE) -62.8 PSF AND ZONE 3 (4'X4' CORNERS). |
| | CLARIFY WHY PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS HAVE THE SAME |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES AND WHY THE CALCULATED PRESSURES HAVE |
| | ONLY POSITIVE PRESSURES IN THE FIELD AND NEGATIVE |
| | PRESSURES ON PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS.ON THE OTHER |
| | HAND DESIGN PRESSURESARE TOO LOWSEE REVISED TABLE |
| | 1609.6.2.1(2) OF FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | E) FLOOR PLANS CALL FOR EXTERIOR STAIRS TO BE UNDER |
| | A SEPARATE PERMIT, BUT STAIR PLANS WERE SUBMITTED AND |
| | ARE PART OF THE CONTRACTORS SCOPE OF WORK DESCRIBED IN |
| | THE PERMIT APPLICATION.INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION ON |
| | VALUATION OF PROJECT. CLARIFY/REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| | AVOID CONFLICTS. |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET A-2 SHOWSINFORMATION FOR NEW ROOF |
| | UNDERLAYMENT. IT'S NOT CLEAR IF NEW ROOF IS PART OF |
| | THIS PERMIT OR NOT.OWNER STATED THAT NO ROOF WORK |
| | WILL BE PERFORMED. ON THE OTHER HAND IF ROOF WORK IS |
| | REQUIRED, THEN CORRESPONDING PRODUCT APPROVAL IS |
| | REQUIRED.ALSO, COORDINATE INFORMATION GIVEN ON TYP. |
| | WALL SECTION. |
| | |
| | 5- SHEET A-2 SHOWS INFORMATION FOR INTERIOR BEARING |
| | WALL.SHEET A-1 DOESN'T SHOW WHICH ARE THE INTERIOR |
| | BEARING WALLS TO BE REPAIRED. |
| | ALSO, NEED TO KEEP IN MIND THAT TENANT SEPARATION WALLS |
| | NEED TO BE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED ASSEMBLIES. |
| | |
| | 6- FOUNDATION NOTES ON SHEET A-2 CALLS FOR 2000 PSF |
| | SOIL BEARING CAPACITY, WHILE INFORMATION ON SHEET A-1 |
| | CALLS FOR 2500 PSF SOIL BEARING CAPACITY. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7- FLOOR PLANS AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHOW SOME |
| | WINDOWS AND DOORS AS EXISTING.THEY ARE NOT EXISTING, |
| | THEY ARE PART OF THIS SCOPE OF WORK BECAUSE THEY WERE |
| | INSTALLED WITHOUT PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 8- STAIRS AND HANDRAILSNED TO COMPLY WITH COMPLETE |
| | SEC.1009 OF FBC 2004.REVISE TREADS, RISERS, |
| | OBSTRUCTIONS, HANDRAIL HEIGHT, PROJECTIONS, DIMENSIONS |
| | ETC.REVISE DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 9- HANDRAILS NEED TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 1012 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 10- CLARIFY WHY STAIRS ARE DESIGNED AS ENCLOSED. SEE |
| | SHEET A-1 OF STAIR DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | 11- STAIR DRAWINGS SHOW WINDOWS ON REAR ELEVATION TO BE |
| | IMPACT GLASS WINDOWS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALFOR |
| | IMPACT WINDOWS. SEE ITEM #7 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 12-NEED TO PROVIDE NEW RECORDED NOTICE OF |
| | COMMENCEMENT BECAUSE THE CONTRACTOR WAS CHANGED. |
| | |
| | 13- THERE ARE 2 DIFFERENT NOA'S SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.ONE IS NOA 02-0723.04 AND THE |
| | OTHER IS 03-1210.06. PROVIDE ONLY TWO COPIES (REVIEWED |
| | BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD) FOR SPECIFIC NOA TO BE |
| | USED. |
| | |
| | ALSO, MAKE SURE DRAWINGS MATCH SPECIFIC PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. EG: INFORMATION SUBMITTED WITH NOA 02-0729.04 |
| | DOES'NT MATCH. |
| | |
| | 14- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 (REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD) |
| | FOR: |
| | A)WINDOW MULLIONS. |
| | |
| | B) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS/SECTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6712 |
