| Date |
Text |
| 2007-02-22 09:12:46 | BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- SCOPE OF WORK DESCRIPTION SHOWN ON PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION DOESN'T MATCH SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED. PERMIT APPLICATION SAYS "INSTALL 5 NEW |
| | WINDOWS, 1 DOOR, SMALL STUCCO REPAIR AND REPAIR CEMENT |
| | FOUNDATION".ON THE OTHER HAND PLANS SHOW COMPLETE NEW |
| | WALLS, REPLACEMENT OF ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS,REPLACING |
| | WINDOWS FOR DOORS ON SECOND FLOOR, ADDING A NEW LANDING |
| | AND STAIRWAY FOR NEW DOORS ON SECOND FLOOR. INFORMATION |
| | ON PERMIT APPLICATION NEEDS TO MATCH PLANS. ALSO, |
| | REVISE DECLARED PERMIT VALUATION TO REFLECT PROPOSED |
| | SCOPE OF WORK. INCLUDE ENGINEERING SERVICES. OTHERWISE, |
| | PERMIT VALUATION WILL BE ESTIMATED AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 108.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 2- ENGINEER PLANS CALL FOR REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS ON |
| | SECOND FOR FOR NEW DOORS. NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | FRAMING DETAILS FOR NEW DOOR OPENINGS. ALSO, NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTIONS/DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | FOR NEW LANDING AND STAIRWAY TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | SEC. 1009AND SEC. 1607.7 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 3- PROPOSED STAIRWAY AND LANDING NEED TO BE APPROVED BY |
| | THE HISTORIC DISTRICT AND ZONING.THIS IS NEW |
| | INFORMATION AND WAS NOT REVIEWED BY THEM. |
| | |
| | 4- A) ENGINEER CALCULATIONS FOR WIND PRESSURES DON'T |
| | MATCH INFORMATION GIVEN ON DRAWING 1.1.CHECK BUILDING |
| | EXPOSURE AND APPLICABLE ENCLOSURE CLASSIFICATION. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) ENGINEER TO SIGN AND SEAL EACH SHEET OF ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS AND PROVIDE THE FIRM'S CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA |
| | STATUTES AND SEC. 61G15-23.002 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5- THERE IS SOME HAND WRITTEN INFORMATION ON DRAWING |
| | 1.1 ON SUPPLEMENTAL FOOTER CONNECTION DETAIL. |
| | ALTERATIONS OR HANDWRITTEN INFORMATION IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE. ALL REVISIONS OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | NEEDS TO BE DONE ON THE ORIGINALDRAWINGS, NOT ON THE |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED COPIES. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6- ATTACHMENT/FASTENER SPECIFICATIONS TABLE: |
| | A) REVISE FASTENER SIZE SPECIFIED FOR SOFFIT WIRE |
| | LATH ATTACHMENT. SEE ASTM C926 AND ASTM C1063 FOR |
| | CORRECT SIZE. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE FASTENER SPACING FOR ROOF ZONE #3 AS |
| | REQUIRED BY TABLE 2304.9.1 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE ONLY THE INFORMATION THAT APPLIES TO THIS |
| | JOB. |
| | |
| | 7- NEED TO SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS FOR WINDOWS W2 AND W5 |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 2406.3 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 8-FLOOR PLANS CALL FOR W2 WINDOWS ON FIRST FLOOR, |
| | WHILE EXTERIOR ELEVATION CALLS FOR W5 WINDOWS ON FIRST |
| | FLOOR.REVISE FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS TO MATCH. |
| | SAME COMMENT APPLIES TO SECOND FLOOR. |
| | |
| | 9- FIRST FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR NEW 2X4 BEARING WALL |
| | BETWEEN KITCHEN AND BATH. PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | DETAIL/SPECS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | 10- A) PLANS CALL FOR NEW 72"X80" SLIDING GLASS DOOR. |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9B-72. |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAIL FOR NEW SLIDING |
| | GLASS DOOR. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTSTO FBC 2004 |
| | |
| | 11- ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.SOME PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE |
| | MISSING THE REVIEW STAMP. ONLY ONE COPY WAS STAMPED. |
| | EG; STORM PANELS AND SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. |
| | |
| | 12- EXTERIOR WALL OPENING SCHEDULE ON DRAWING 3: |
| | A) WINDOWS TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 1005 FBC IS THE WRONG |
| | SEC. SEE FBC 2004 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) SECOND NOTE CALLS FOR IMPACT RESISTANT WINDOWS. |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR NON-IMPACT WINDOWS. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | ALSO, CLARIFY WHY PRODUCT APPROVALS TO BE REVIEWED AND |
| | SUBMITTED PRIOR TO TIE BEAM INSPECTION .PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS NEED TO BE SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION AND THIS IS A WOOD FRAMED HOUSE. |
| | |
| | 13- ENGINEER TO PROVIDE ENGINEER ANALYSIS SHOWING HOW |
| | THE SPECIFIED ATTACHMENT OF FRAMED WALL TO FOOTING WILL |
| | RESIST ALLCALCULATED WIND LOADS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 14- ENGINEER TO READ ATTACHED COPY OF FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | 553.80(2)(B) REGARDING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DOCUMENTS |
| | AND PLAN REVIEW FEES. |
| | |
| | 15- STORM SHUTTERS: |
| | A) CLARIFY HOW ARE PANELS INSTALLED WITH 3" EDGE |
| | DISTANCE AT BOTTOM OF PANEL IS WINDOW FRAMING IS ONLY |
| | 3" MAX. (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWING #2). REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF INSTALLATION SCHEDULE |
| | |
| | 16- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS EXPIRED AFTER 90 DAYS IF |
| | WORK IS NOT COMMENCED. SEE SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | NEED RE-RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
