| Date |
Text |
| 2007-09-18 15:09:12 | CITY HALL/ CITY CENTER REVISION# 11 |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 06100574 |
| | ADD: 401 CLEMATIS ST. |
| | CONT: CATALFUMO |
| | TEL: (561)307-4746 |
| | |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | REVISION # 11 |
| | |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTES SHEET A8-0.2 FOOTNOTE D DOOR SHALL HAVE |
| | CLOSER |
| | FOOTNOTE E SMOKE |
| | AND DRAFT CONTROL ASSEMBLY W/ ARTIFICIAL BOTTOM SEAL |
| | |
| | INSTALLED ACROSS THE FULL WIDTH OFTHE BOTTOM OF THE |
| | DOOR ALL |
| | |
| | IN COMPLIANCE WITHUL 1784. |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET A1-1.1: |
| | 1A) DOOR A1-120A IS MISSING FOOTNOTE "D & E" |
| | 1B) DOOR A1-201A IS MISSING FOOTNOTE "E" |
| | 1C) SECURITY DESKA 1 HR RATED WALL IN FRONT OF DESK, |
| | PLEASE SEE A9.3.1 DETAIL# 4, NOW IS MISSING RATED WALL |
| | AND DOORWAY |
| | 1D) RECEPTION DESK A 1 HR RATED WALL PLEASE SEE A9-3.1 |
| | DETAIL# 3 NOW HAS BY PASS WINDOWS, 1 HR RATED? |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET A1-2.1 |
| | 2A) DOOR A2-008-A 1 HR RATED DOOR MISSING FOOTNOTE |
| | "D&E" |
| | 2B) DOOR A2-001-A1 HR RATED DOOR MISSING FOOTNOTE |
| | "D&E" |
| | |
| | 3)SHEET A1-3.2 : |
| | 3A)DOOR C3-105-A, 1 HR RATED DOOR IS MISSING FOOTNOTE |
| | "D&E" |
| | 3B) DOOR C3-106-A , 1 HR RATED DOOR IS MISSING FOOTNOTE |
| | "D&E" |
| | 3C) DOOR C3-107-A, 1 HR RATED DOOR ISMISSING FOOTNOTE |
| | "D&E" |
| | 3D)DOOR C3-108-A, 1 HR RATED DOOR IS MISSING FOOTNOTE |
| | "D&E" |
| | 3E)DOOR C3-109-A, 1 HR RATED DOOR IS MISSING FOOTNOTE |
| | "D&E" |
| | |
| | NOTE MEETING AT CONSTRUCTION SITE 9-18-07 : |
| | |
| | 1) DISCUSSED THE NEED FOR CUT SECTIONS OF THE |
| | STAIRTOWER# 10 THIRD FLOOR INDICATING A 2 HR RATING |
| | BETWEEN THE A/C DUCT AND |
| | STAIRWELL AS WELL AS THE MOVING THE FIRE DAMPERS FROM |
| | WITHIN THE STAIRTOWER WALLS TO ALLOW FOR ACCESS PANELS |
| | OUTSIDE OF THE STAIR TOWER. |
| | |
| | 2) STIAR WAY # 11 DISCUSSED THE NEED OF A CUT SECTION |
| | THROUGH THE STAIRWAY INDICATING THE PLACEMENT OF THE |
| | MEZZANINE FLOOR THAT WILL KEEP THE DUCTWORK FROM |
| | ENTERING STAIRTOWER #7. |
| | |
| | 3) THE THIRD ISSUE THAT WAS ALSO BROUGHT UP THAT NO |
| | SHAFT WALL WILL BE NECESSARY IN THE MEZZANINE STAIRWAY |
| | SINCE IT IS WITHIN THE STORY. THERE ARE CONCERNS ON THE |
| | REQUIRED WIDTH OF THE STAIR! |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET A8-0.1DOORS MISSING FOOTNOTE :1 HR RATED |
| | DOOR MISSING FOOTNOTE "D&E" |
| | A1-120-A |
| | A1-201-A |
| | A2-008-A |
| | A2-001-A |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET A8-0.2 DOORS MISSING FOOTNOTE: 1 HR RATED DOOR |
| | MISSING FOOTNOTE "D&E" |
| | C3-105-A |
| | C3-106-A |
| | C3-107-A |
| | C3-108-A |
| | C3-110-A |
| | |
| | 6)SHEET A9-3.1 COMMENT 1C & 1D. |
| | |
| | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS |
| | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST |
| | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT |
| | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC |
| | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC |
| | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
