| Date |
Text |
| 2006-12-26 09:17:31 | WEST PALM BEACH |
| | CITY CENTER- CITY HALL |
| | PERMIT# 06100574 |
| | 401 CLEMATIS ST. |
| | FIFTH REVIEW DEC. 23/06 |
| | |
| | ARCHITECT: SONG & ASSOCIATES |
| | ENGINEER: MEINHART CONSULTING ENGINEERS |
| | |
| | NOTE: THIS REVIEW WILL BE COMPLETED UNDER 2004 FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, |
| | (*)MEANS CHAPTER 1 WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 1) --- VERY IMPORTANT |
| | STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2)COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 3A)CIVIL ENGINEERS: CRAVEN THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, |
| | INC. IS MISSING THEIR CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION. |
| | 471.023 F.S.CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION.THE TITLE |
| | BLOCK FOR ANY SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN ENGINEER |
| | PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A CORPORATION, OR A |
| | PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ENGINEERING SERVICES, SHALL |
| | INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. ADD |
| | THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET.THIS MAY |
| | BE ADDED BY HAND. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 5) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 6) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 7) COMPLIED. |
| | PAGE 1 |
| | |
| | 8)FIFTH REQUEST, THORNTON TOMASETTI HAS ATTEMPTED TO |
| | COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT BY SUPPLYING A COVERSHEET |
| | WITH THEIR SHOP DRAWING STAMP AND SIGNATURE BUTTHIS |
| | DOCUMENT DOESN?T INDICATE WHAT PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | DOCUMENT IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED. |
| | WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS.THOSE |
| | PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | 9) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 10) IN REVIEWING THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN,THERE |
| | IS NO COMMENT ON REQUIREMENTS FOR SHORING AND RESHORING |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS AND INSPECTIONS FORFLOOR SLABS ABOVE |
| | GRADE. |
| | |
| | FL S. S. 553.71(7) ?THRESHOLD BUILDING" MEANING ANY |
| | BUILDING |
| | WHICH IS GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT IN HEIGHT, |
| | OR WHICH HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS |
| | DENIED IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 |
| | SQ FT IN AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN |
| | 500 PERSONS. |
| | 105.13.1 THE ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL |
| | INSPECTOR TO PERFORM |
| | STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING PURSUANT |
| | TO A STRUCTURAL |
| | INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE |
| | STRUCTURAL INSPECTION |
| | PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENFORCING AGENCY PRIOR TO |
| | THE ISSUANCE OF A |
| | BUILDINGS PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDING. THE PURPOSE OF THE |
| | STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC |
| | INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND |
| | SCHEDULES SO THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY |
| | INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 11) 3RD REQUEST, RESPONSE SHEET INDICATES THE SPECIAL |
| | INSPECTOR FORMS TO BE PART OF THE SUBMITTALS, WHERE? |
| | WPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES |
| | DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A SPECIAL |
| | INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY S. 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. |
| | CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR |
| | PROGRAM AT (561) 805-6711 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION |
| | BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. |
| | SEE ATTACHED GUIDELINE. |
| | |
| | 12) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 13) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 14)5TH REQUEST, IN REVIEWING THIS PLAN IT APPEARS |
| | THAT THERE ARE VARIOUS DOORS THAT DO NOT MEET THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF:11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT |
| | DOORS. MINIMUM MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE |
| | NOT AUTOMATIC OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN |
| | FIG. 25. THE FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITH IN THE REQUIRED |
| | CLEARANCES SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. |
| | SEE LIST OF DOORS:A1-302A. PLEASE CLOUD OR DELTA THESE |
| | CHANGES. |
| | PAGE2 |
| | |
| | 15)COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 16) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 17) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 18) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 19) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 20) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 21) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 22) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 23) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 24) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 25) COMPLIED C-10. |
| | |
| | 26) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 27) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 28) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 29) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 30) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 32A) 3RD REQUEST, THE DOOR SCHEDULE NEEDS RATINGS FOR |
| | SMOKEAND FIRE RATINGS DEPENDING ON FORTH COMING |
| | DOCUMENTATION FROM SONG & ASSOCIATES. |
| | |
| | 32B) 2ND REQUEST, THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN AND THE ?A? |
| | SHEETS DO NOT MATCH UP FOR SMOKE AND FIRE RATINGS OF |
| | ALL ELECTRICAL ROOMS, STORAGE ROOMS, MECHANICAL ROOMS |
| | AND ELEVATOR MECHANICAL ROOMS. THE ?A? SHEETS ARE |
| | MISSING THE WALL DESIGNATIONS FOR EITHER SMOKE ORHR |
| | RATINGS. |
| | |
| | 33) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 34) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 35) COMPLIED. |
| | PAGE 3 |
| | 36) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 37) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 38A) EMPLOYEE LOUNGE, MET WITH TOM KASTNER12-21-06 |
| | ABOUT THE EMPLOYEE LOUNGE, |
| | SONG & ASSOCIATES FOR A NET SQ FOOTAGE WERE |
| | TAKING OUT CABINET SQ FT FOR NET NOT |
| | WALL TO WALL. SONG & ASSOCIATES WILL CORRECT TO |
| | REDUCE THE OCCUPANT LOAD TO LESS THAN 50. |
| | |
| | 38B) FOURTH FLOOR TRAINING ROOM, I RECEIVED A LETTER |
| | FROM WILLIAM SWISHER THAT SATES: |
| | 1) FIXED SEATING NOT TO EXCEED 49 STATIONS. 2) OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD TO BE POSTED IN THE ROOM 49 PERSONS 3) ROOM IS NOT |
| | TO BE ALTERED TO ALLOW GREATER THAN 49 PERSONS. |
| | |
| | 38C) LS1-3.2 & A1-3.2 BOTH SHEETS ARE MISSING THE 1 HR |
| | RATED CORRIDOR WALL BETWEEN |
| | THE ASSEMBLY AND BUSINESS OCCUPANCIES. TABLE 1016.1. |
| | |
| | 39) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 40) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 41) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 42) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 43) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 44) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 45A)SHEET LS0.0 CODE SUMMARY- FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS |
| | FOR SEPARATIONS, |
| | THIS SHEET IDENTIFIES NUMEROUS CODE SECTIONS SIGHTING |
| | NFPA OR FBC BUT IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE THE DOORS ARE NOT |
| | RATED, ELECTRIC ROOM DOOR B1-111A, |
| | MECHANICAL ROOM DOOR B1-102A. T-1016/ 708.3/ T-302.1.1 |
| | & NFPA. |
| | |
| | 45B) THE ABOVE LISTED MISSING DOOR RATINGS THE |
| | CORRELATING MISSING WALL RATINGS ARE THE MECHANICAL |
| | ROOM B1-102 & THE NEW ELECTRIC ROOM B1-111, NOTE THE |
| | NEW ELECTRIC ROOM IS MISSING ? OF THE WALL DESIGNATION, |
| | SHEET |
| | A1-GA.1. |
| | |
| | 46) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 47) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 48) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | PAGE 4 |
| | 49) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 50) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 51) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 52) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 53) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 54) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 55) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 56) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 57) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 58) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 59) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 60) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 61) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 62) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 63) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 64) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 65) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 66) (SAME AS 38C), MISSING CORRIDOR RATING BETWEEN |
| | BUSINESS AND ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY TABLE 1016. |
| | |
| | 67) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 68)COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 69) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 70) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | PAGE 5 |
| | |
| | 71) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 72) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 73) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 74) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 75) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 76) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 77) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | NOTE ITEMS 78- 81 FIRST REVIEW!!!! |
| | |
| | 78)FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4 |
| | : COMPONENTS & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES (3 IF |
| | THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING |
| | REPORTS. |
| | |
| | BEFORE THE SUBMITTED REPORTS CAN BE FULLY REVIEWED |
| | THERE ARE CONCERNS ABOUT WIND PRESSURES, CONCERNING |
| | ELEVATIONS NOT SHOWN IN THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS. |
| | |
| | A) THE TUNNELING EFFECT WIND WILL HAVE BETWEEN THE |
| | PORTION OF CITY HALL GARAGE AND THE EAST END OF THE |
| | BUILDING THAT IS 5 STORIES TALL WITH THE DOME.THERE |
| | IS NO ELEVATIONS INDICATING WHAT POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE |
| | PRESSURES WILL OCCUR IN THIS AREA. |
| | THE SECOND CONCERN IS THE INCREASED TUNNELING EFFECT |
| | WILL OCCUR WITH THE |
| | THE ENCLOSING OF THE GARAGE, TO BE AN ENCLOSED GARAGE. |
| | |
| | |
| | B) THE SECOND AREA THAT IS NOT SHOWN IS THE PORTION OF |
| | THE BUILDING THAT JOINS |
| | THE LIBRARY TO THE 5 STORY SECTION OF THE |
| | STRUCTURE. THIS AREA HAS A SERIES OF |
| | STEPPED ROOFS CREATING A SAW TOOTHED EFFECT |
| | WHICH WILL CREATE A SERIES OF |
| | VORTEX ZONES AS THE WIND RUSHES OVER THE SERIES |
| | OF STEPPED PARAPETS, AGAIN |
| | THE PLANS DO NOT ADDRESS THESE AREAS FOR THE |
| | PRESSURE ZONES OR THE |
| | POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE PRESSURES FOR THESE |
| | AREAS. |
| | |
| | |
| | C) THE THIRD ITEM OF CONCERN IS THE SHOP DRAWINGS |
| | CREATED BY TRAINER GLASS INDICATING THE DIFFERENT |
| | WINDOW TYPES AND THEIR USE IN THE STRUCTURE AND |
| | ASSOCIATED WIND ZONES. THEY HAVE INDICATED THE AREAS OF |
| | CONCERN |
| | (78 A& B). |
| | D) AS INTERIOR ZONES AND NO MENTION OF POSSIBLE HIGHER |
| | PRESSURE, NOR HAS THIS DOCUMENT BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE |
| | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR REVIEW OR APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | PAGE 6 |
| | |
| | |
| | REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| | A) FIXED WINDOWS- |
| | B) OPERABLE WINDOWS |
| | C) MULLIONS NOT COVERED BY NOA THE REPORTS FOR THE |
| | CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM HAVE A LIMITATION OF 171? ON THE |
| | MULLIONS. |
| | D) GLAZED DOORS, AUTOMATIC SLIDERS, SWING DOORS OR |
| | PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF ACCESS HATCHES- THIS IS A PRODUCT |
| | THAT IS REGULATED BY FLORIDA STATUTE RULE 9B-72- AT |
| | THIS TIME IT APPEARS THERE IS NO PRODUCT THAT IS TESTED |
| | THROUGH THE STATE OR THROUGH MIAMI-DADE?S NOA. THIS HAS |
| | BEEN BROUGHT UP BY BUILDING OFFICIAL AT THE PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY BCAB BOARD IN NOVEMBER / 06 TO SEE HOW OTHER |
| | JURISDICTIONS WERE HANDLING THIS ISSUE FURTHER |
| | DISCUSSION TO BE ON THE JANUARY BOARD AGENDA. |
| | |
| | E) EXTERIOR METAL DOORS IF SINGLE OR PAIRS- COVERED |
| | UNDER COMMENT# 81. |
| | F) ROLL-UP OR SECTIONAL DOORS- MISSING FLORIDA COVER |
| | SHEET, PROVIDE WIND |
| | INFORMATION!!!!!!! |
| | G) LOUVERS- WALL - OK |
| | H) PANEL WALLS: SOFFITS, EFIS, STOREFRONTS, CURTAIN |
| | WALLS- NO REPORT SUBMITTED |
| | I) SKYLIGHTS- CANOPY ROOF PANELS-SEE A5.02 SECTION |
| | 1 CHANGE DELTA(2) PROVIDE |
| | MORE INFORMATION ON THIS SYSTEM |
| | J)PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS- PROVIDE TECHNICAL |
| | SHEETS 1-3. PLEASE HIGHLIGHT WHICH FASTENING SYSTEM TO |
| | THE STRUCTURAL DECK BELOW . |
| | K) ROOFING PRODUCTS: BUILT UP, MODIFIED, SINGLE PLY |
| | SYSTEMS, METAL ROOFING |
| | SPRAY APPLIED POLYURETHANE, ROOF SYSTEM |
| | FASTENERS, UNDERLAYMENTS AND |
| | WATERPROOFING |
| | |
| | (K1) THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY ATLANTIC & CARIBBEAN ROOF |
| | CONSULTANTS, IF REPORT IS SUBMITTED BY A REGISTERED |
| | ROOFING CONSULTANT, THEN TO BE SEALED WITH THE |
| | APPROPRIATE SEAL. THE WORDING TESTING AND ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES INDICATES AN ENGINEERING FIRM, WHICH IS A |
| | LICENSED ENGINEERING FIRM, MISSING THEIR CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION ON THIS REPORT, AND NOT SEALED BY THE |
| | ENGINEER. |
| | 471.023 F.S.CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION.THE TITLE BLOCK FOR ANY |
| | SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN ENGINEER |
| | PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A |
| | CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. |
| | |
| | PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR |
| | OTHER DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND |
| | BEING FILED FOR PUBLIC |
| | RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND |
| | SEAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED |
| | TO THE DOCUMENT. |
| | FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS |
| | FL ATATE STAT: 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS |
| | |
| | (K2) THE SUBMITTED REPORT INDICATES VARIOUS ROOF DECKS |
| | BY NUMBER BUT THERE IS NO KEY PLAN PROVIDING THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE ROOF DECKS. |
| | PAGE 7 |
| | |
| | |
| | (K3) ROOF DECK NUMBER (2) INDICATES A HEIGHT OF 87? |
| | WHERE IS THIS DECK LOCATED? |
| | |
| | (K4) LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE ROOF DECK- MIAMI-DADE NOA, |
| | THE REPORT SUBMITTED DOES NOT HAVE THE SUB-SYSTEM |
| | HIGHLIGHTED AS TO WHICH SUB-SYSTEM WILL BE INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | (K5) TRIODETIC PREFABRICATED METAL BUILDING SYSTEM- NO |
| | SUBMITTALS EITHER STATE APPROVAL OR A MIAMI-DADE |
| | APPROVAL. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR ON FURTHER |
| | REVIEWS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. |
| | IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT |
| | RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 |
| | M) IN BUILDINGS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE |
| | BALANCE OF GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING |
| | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT |
| | RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR |
| | PROTECTED WITH AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, |
| | OR MIAMI-DADE TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN |
| | AS FOLLOWS: 1.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 |
| | FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED |
| | MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE TEST. |
| | |
| | |
| | 79) SEE NEXT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | 80)SAME REQUEST AS COMMENT# 8,W.P.B. ADMIN CODE |
| | 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. THORNTON |
| | TOMASETTI HAS ATTEMPTED TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT |
| | BY SUPPLYING A COVERSHEET WITH THEIR SHOP DRAWING STAMP |
| | AND SIGNATURE BUTTHIS DOCUMENT DOESN?T INDICATE WHAT |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL DOCUMENT IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 81) 2ND REQUEST, THE SUBMITTAL FOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS |
| | WILL WORK AT GROUND LEVEL BUT THE DOORS AT THE ROOF TOP |
| | LEVEL WILL NOT THE REQUIRED HIGHER PRESSURE. 1714.5.3 |
| | EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES. |
| | EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES NOT COVERED BY SECTION |
| | 1715.4.2 OR SECTION 1714.5.3.1 SHALL BE TESTED FOR |
| | STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 330 |
| | PROCEDURE A, AT A LOAD OF 1.5 TIMES THE REQUIRED DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE LOAD. THE LOAD SHALL BE SUSTAINED FOR 10 |
| | SECONDS WITH NO PERMANENT DEFORMATION OF ANY MAIN FRAME |
| | OR PANEL MEMBER IN EXCESS OF 0.4 PERCENT OF ITS SPAN |
| | AFTER THE LOAD IS REMOVED. HIGH-VELOCITY HURRICANE |
| | ZONES SHALL COMPLY WITH TAS 202. AFTER EACH SPECIFIED |
| | LOADING, THERE SHALL BE NO GLASS BREAKAGE, PERMANENT |
| | DAMAGE TO FASTENERS, HARDWARE PARTS, OR ANY OTHER |
| | DAMAGE WHICH CAUSES THE DOOR TO BE INOPERABLE. PAGE 8 |
| | |
| | 82) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 83) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 84) COMPLIED, EXEMPT A MUNICIPALITY. |
| | |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | WEST PALM BEACH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT WEST |
| | PALM BEACH, FL 33402 |
| | TEL (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX (561)805-6731 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | CITY HALL CENTER 5TH REVIEW .DOC |