| Date |
Text |
| 2006-10-24 14:29:21 | WEST PALM BEACH |
| | CITY CENTER- CITY HALL |
| | PERMIT# 0610.0574 |
| | ADDRESS: 401 CLEMATIS ST. |
| | |
| | FOURTHREVIEW OCT. 24TH, 2006 |
| | FIRST UNDER PERMIT |
| | ARCHITECT: SONG & ASSOCIATES |
| | ENGINEER: MEINHART CONSULTING ENGINEERS |
| | |
| | NOTE: THIS REVIEW WILL BE COMPLETED UNDER 2004 FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, |
| | (*)MEANS CHAPTER 1 WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | ***SHEET T-1 APPLICABLE CODEPLEASE CORRECT TO THE |
| | 2004 FBC.***** |
| | |
| | 1) --- VERY IMPORTANT |
| | STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | THIS COMMENT WAS IGNORED UNDER THE FIRST |
| | REVIEW, THE DESIGN TEAM DIDN?T PROVIDE ANY TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER, NOR WERE ANY OF THE CHANGES MADE HIGHLIGHTED |
| | WITH A CLOUD OR DELTA AND THE REVISION BOX IN THE |
| | HEADER STRIP WASN?T FILLED IN MAKING DIFFICULT TO FIND |
| | THE REVISIONS MADE AND TIME CONSUMING!!!! |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) PLANS INDICATE 100% COMPLETE BUT ARE ONLY A PARTIAL |
| | ROLL,WHEN PLANS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD |
| | :PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS,REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS |
| | PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR |
| | PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND |
| | SEAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE |
| | DOCUMENT. |
| | FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS |
| | FL ATATE STAT: 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLANS ARE NOT SEALED THIS IS A COURTESY |
| | REVIEW, WHEN PLANS ARE SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD: NEW |
| | ENGINEERING SEAL DESIGN. "LICENSE" A GRACE PERIOD RAN |
| | THROUGH DEC. 31, 2005. |
| | RULE 61G155-23.001(1) F.A.C. |
| | THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS HAS |
| | CLEANED UP THE APPEARANCE OF THE SEAL BY ELIMINATING |
| | OBSOLETE CONTENT AND CHANGING THE WORD "CERTIFICATE" |
| | TO |
| | |
| | COVERSHEET: |
| | 3A) CIVIL ENGINEERS: CRAVEN THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. |
| | IS MISSING THEIR CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION.) |
| | 471.023 F.S.CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION.THE TITLE BLOCK FOR ANY |
| | SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN ENGINEER |
| | PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A |
| | CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. |
| | ADD THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET.THIS MAY |
| | BE ADDED BY HAND. |
| | |
| | 4)FOURTH REQUEST, STRUCTURAL SHEET TITLE BLOCK INDICATE |
| | THAT THORNTON TOMASETTI A CONSULTING ENGINEER, FL DEPT |
| | OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DOESN'T INDICATE LICENSURE |
| | IN FLORIDA. |
| | LICENSURE FL S. S. 471.015/471.023 F.S. CERTIFICATE |
| | OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION.THE TITLE BLOCK FOR ANY |
| | SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN ENGINEER |
| | PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A |
| | CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. |
| | ADD THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET.THIS MAY |
| | BE ADDED BY HAND. |
| | |
| | 5) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 6) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 7) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 8) FOURTHREQUEST,PRODUCT APPROVAL HAVE BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME. WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS.THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA |
| | RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 9) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 10) COMPLIED. SHEET# S0-2.0 STRUCTURAL INSPECTION |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | |
| | 11) THIRDREQUEST,WPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY S. |
| | 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS |
| | REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER |
| | OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561) 805-6711 FOR |
| | FURTHER INFORMATION BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. |
| | SEE ATTACHED GUIDELINE. |
| | |
| | 12) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 13) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 14)THIRD REQUEST, IN REVIEWING THIS PLAN IT APPEARS |
| | THAT THERE ARE VARIOUS DOORS THAT DO NOT MEET THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF:11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT |
| | DOORS. MINIMUM MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE |
| | NOT AUTOMATIC OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN |
| | FIG. 25. THE FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITH IN THE REQUIRED |
| | CLEARANCES SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. SEE LIST :A1-302A & |
| | A4-202A. PLEASE CLOUD OR DELTA THESE CHANGES. |
| | |
| | 15) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 16) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 17) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 18) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 19) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 20) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 21) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 22) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 23)4TH REQUEST,SHEET A1-D DETAILS 1.1 ? 2.2 |
| | ILLUSTRATE THE USE OF GRANITE VENEER. DETAIL 1.1B |
| | PROVIDES INFO FOR ATTACHMENT BUT DOES NOT MATCH TO |
| | SECTION 1405.7 FOR SLAB TYPE <2?THICK (GRANITE).ALSO |
| | PROVIDE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE PER GRANITE. THE MAXIMUM |
| | AREA PER SLAB STILL ISN'T INDICATED ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 24) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 25) FOURTH REQUEST, PLANS INDICATE FIRST FLOOR FINISH |
| | FLOOR TO BE 17.35 NGVD, BUT NO SITE PLAN PROVIDES THE |
| | EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS. PROVIDE AT LEAST 1 |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE SITE. 11-4.1.2(1-4). IN |
| | DISCUSSING THE SIDEWALKS AROUND THE PERIMETER WITH THE |
| | DESIGN TEAM AT THE LAST MEETING THERE WILL BE CONCERNS |
| | WITH CROSS SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED THE 2%. THE DESIGN TEAM |
| | INDICATED THAT BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND STREET CURBING |
| | THERE WILL BE PLANTERS FOR TREES, BUT BETWEEN THE TREE |
| | PLANTERS THERE WILL ALSO BE A WALKING SURFACE ( BRICKS) |
| | THAT WILL HAVE CROSS SLOPE GREATER THAN 2%. |
| | IN DISCUSSING THIS ISSUE WITH THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL IF THE SLOPE OF THE BRICK IS GREATER THAN 2% |
| | THEN SOME TYPE OF BARRIER NEEDS TO BE IN EFFECT, EITHER |
| | EDGE PROTECTION OR A GUARD. 11-4.3.7 11-4.3.7 SLOPE. AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A RUNNING SLOPE GREATER THAN 1:20 |
| | IS A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 11-4.8 . |
| | NOWHERE SHALL THE CROSS SLOPE OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE |
| | EXCEED 1:50. |
| | |
| | 26) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 27) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 28) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 29) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 30) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 31) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 32) 2ND REVIEW,DOOR SCHEDULE DOESN?T PROVIDE |
| | RATING FOR ALL THE VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURES (STAIRWELL |
| | DOORS). FBC 1019. |
| | 32A) IN CHECKING THE DOOR SCHEDULE FOR EXIT STAIRWAYS |
| | LS1-1.1 AND A1-1.1 STAIRWELL & VESTIBULE 02 DOESN'T |
| | MATCH IN CONFIGURATION. |
| | 32B) MISSING DOOR RATINGS ON ALL ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, ELEVATOR MECHANICAL ROOMS AND STORAGE |
| | ROOMS, SEE A-8.01-.02 |
| | NOTE : TABLE 715.3 FOOTNOTE "B". SEE 715.3.3 |
| | FIRE DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL ALSO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | FOR A SMOKE AND DRAFT- CONTROL DOOR ASSEMBLY TESTED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH UL 1784 WITH AN ARTIFICIAL BOTTOM SEAL |
| | INSTALLED ACROSS THE FULL WIDTH OF THE BOTTOM OF THE |
| | DOOR ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | 33) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 34) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 35) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 36) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 37) |
| | |
| | 38)A) EMPLYEES LOUNGE LS1-3.1& A-1.3.1 THE FLOOR PLAN |
| | CALCULATES OUT TO BE BETWEEN 844 & 840 SQ FT /15= TO AN |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD OF 56 REQUIRING 2 EXITS AND THE CORRIDORS |
| | TO BE FIRE RATED 1 HR. |
| | TABLE 1016.1. THIS WILL ALSO REQUIRE THE DOORS TO HAVE |
| | THE FIRE RATING NOT SHOWN ON THE DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 38B) TRAINING ROOM LS1-4.1 THE TRAINING ROOM AND |
| | VESTIBULE TOTAL 1495 SQ FT/20= 75 OCCUPANT LOAD. THE |
| | DECUSSION AT LAST WEEKS MEETING WAS THAT WILLIAM |
| | SWICHER HAD INDICATED THIS WAS TO BE FIXED SEATING, WE |
| | HAVE E-MAILED MR. SWICHER TO VERIFY THIS ROOM WILL HAVE |
| | FIXED SEATING BOLTED TO THE FLOOR. AT PRESENT NO REPLY |
| | FROM MR. SWICHER.PLEASE PROVIDE THE1HR RATED |
| | CORRIDOR AND OPENING PROTECTIVES REQUIRED BY TABLE |
| | 1016.1. |
| | |
| | 38C) LS1-3.2 & A1-3.2 IS STILL MISSING THE 1 HR RATING |
| | BETWEEN THE CORRIDOR THAT SEPERATES THE BUSINESS AND |
| | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY. TABLE 1016.1. |
| | |
| | 39) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 40) SECOND REQUEST,THE OTHER ISSUE THAT WAS DISCUSSED |
| | WITH THE DESIGN TEAM IS THE ?MECHANICAL MEZZANINE? , |
| | SHEET LS1-1.2, THIS SHEET DOESN?T INDICATE THE |
| | MEZZANINE LEVEL, OR SIZE. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE A FLOOR PLAN INDICATING THE SIZE OF ROOM AND |
| | FLOOR AREA OF THE MEZZANINE. |
| | INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT PLATFORM CAN ONLY BE USED IN |
| | INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES. 505.5. |
| | THE SECOND ISSUE IS THE USE OF ALTERNATING STAIRS FOUND |
| | ON SHEET A6-6.1. SECTION 1009.1 LIMITS THE USE OF |
| | ALTERNATING TREAD STAIRS TOMEZZANINES OF 250 SQ FT |
| | AND LESS. |
| | |
| | 40A) DOME AREA IS 480 SQ FT. |
| | 40B) A2M101 IS 930 SQ FT. |
| | 40C) A2M102 IS 960 SQ FT. |
| | |
| | 41) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 42) SHEET THAT STILL HAVE DETAIL MARKERS MISSING IS |
| | A1-2.1( MISSING THE SHEET LOCATION) |
| | |
| | 43) COMPLIED, STILL NEEDS WALL AND DOOR RATING. |
| | |
| | 44) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 45)3RD REQUEST , PLANS ARE MISSING THE WALL RATING |
| | TAGS ON SHEET A1-GA.FPL VAULT, MAIN ELECTRIC ROOM, FIRE |
| | PUMP ROOM, DOORS ARE NOT LABELED ON THE |
| | DOOR SCHEDULE . ALSO SEE LS).0 FIRE RESISTANCE |
| | RATINGS. |
| | |
| | 46) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 47) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 48) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 49)COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 50) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 51) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 52) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 53) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 54) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 55) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 56) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 57) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 58) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 59) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 60) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 61) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 62) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 63) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 64) LS1-GA.1- LS1-GA.3THE PARKING GARAGE EXITS DO NOT |
| | HAVE THE REQUIRED EGRESS CAPACITY GRAPHICS FILLED IN. |
| | 106.1.2* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| | LIFE SAFETY PLANS NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 65) 3RDREQUEST, LS1-3.0/ A1-3.2 THERE ARE ISSUES WITH |
| | 3 AREAS: |
| | ELEVATOR LOBBY C3.201 |
| | PREFUNCTION LOBBY C3.301 |
| | LOBBY C3.303 |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WAS MADE AWARE THAT THESE AREAS |
| | INDICATED ON THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN DO NOT HAVE AN |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD ASSIGNED TO THEM.NEIL INDICATED HE |
| | WOULD LIKE |
| | THESE AREAS TO BE TREATED JUST AS THE MALL AREA ON THE |
| | FIRST FLOOR, SUBTRACT THE SQUAREFOOTAGE REQUIRED FOR |
| | EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS OUT OF THE GROSS AREA FOR EACH |
| | AREA, THE NET SQUARE FOOTAGE WOULD BE TREATED AS |
| | ADDITIONAL SQ FOOTAGE TO BE CONSIDERED AT 7 SQUARE FEET |
| | PER PERSON.TABLE 1004.1.2. |
| | |
| | THIS ADDITIONAL OCCUPANT LOAD SHALL BE ADDED TO THE |
| | LIFE SAFETY SHEETS, STAIRS AND DOORWAY MAY NEED TO BE |
| | INCREASED IN SIZE DUE TO THE ADDITIONAL LOADING. |
| | |
| | 66)2ND REQUEST,THE OTHER ISSUE IN THIS AREA OF THE |
| | LIBRARY THIRD FLOOR AND THE AMOUNT OF ASSEMBLY |
| | OCCUPANCY, THE EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS NOT BEING RATED |
| | (NORTH SIDE OF ASSEMBLY AREA). STAIR# 8 VESTIBULE |
| | MISSING FIRE RATING. PLEASE REVISE THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN |
| | AND DOOR SCHEDULE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | TABLE 1016.1 FOR |
| | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY, SPRINKLERED >30= 1 HR FIRE RATED |
| | CORRIDORS. |
| | |
| | 67A) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 67B) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 68) SAME AS 38A AND 38 B. 3RD REQUEST,68)2ND REQUEST, |
| | LS1-3.0 CITY HALL SIDE OF PLAN INDICATES (2) AREAS |
| | WHERE THERE ARE ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES, ROOM A3.108 THE |
| | EMPLOYEES LOUNGE, OCCUPANT LOAD OF 60 AND ROOM NUMBER |
| | A3.110THE EXERCISE ROOM WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 19. |
| | |
| | |
| | THE EMPLOYEE LOUNGE WILL REQUIRE 2 MEANS OF EGRESS, |
| | PLANS DO INDICATE (2) DOORWAYS ONE TO AN EXIT ACCESS |
| | CORRIDOR WHICH WILL REQUIRE A 1 HR FIRE RATING. SEE |
| | TABLE 1016.1 |
| | ASSEMBLY, OCCUPANT LOAD > THAN 30,SPRINKLERED = 1HR |
| | RATED CORRIDORS. |
| | |
| | 69) 3RD REQUEST,THE OTHER ISSUE WITH THE EMPLOYEE |
| | LOUNGE REQUIRING (2) MEANS OF EGRESS BEING A OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD GREATER THAN 50 REQUIRING A SECOND EXIT. TABLE |
| | 1014.1. |
| | PAGE 8 |
| | TO USE THE DOOR FROM THE EMPLOYEE LOUNGE TO THE |
| | EXERCISE ROOM FBC 1013.2 STATES: |
| | EGRESS FROM A ROOM OR SPACE SHALL NOT PASS THROUGH |
| | ADJOINING OR INTERVENING ROOMS OR AREAS, EXCEPT WHERE |
| | SUCH ADJOINING ROOMS OR AREAS ARE ACCESSORY TO THE AREA |
| | SERVED. ALSO THE DOORS TO THE GYM MAY END UP BEING |
| | LOCKED.AN EXIT ACCESS SHALL NOT PASS THROUGH A ROOM |
| | THAT CAN BE LOCKED TO PREVENT EGRESS.1013.2. |
| | |
| | 70) 3RD REQUEST, LS1-3.0 EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR |
| | A3.012WILL HAVE TO BE 1 HR FIRE RATED, TO THE (2) |
| | VERTICAL EXITS ENCLOSURES. TABLE 1014.1/ 1014.1.(1). |
| | |
| | 71) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 72) SAME AS 38B) ,LS1-4.0 / LS1-4.1/ A1-4.0& A1-4.1 |
| | THESE SHEETS INDICATE TRAINING ROOM# A4.403 IS AN |
| | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 75@20 SQ FT |
| | / PERSON, . |
| | TABLE 1016.1 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES >30 OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | LOAD REQUIRES 1 HR FIRE SEPARATION IN THE ASSOCIATED |
| | EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS. THE 2 CORRIDORS THAT LEAD TO THE |
| | VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURES WILL NEED TO BE FIRE RATED 1HR |
| | WITH 20 MINUTE OPENING PROTECTIVES. |
| | |
| | 73) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 74) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 75) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 76) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 77) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 78)78-81 THE CONTRACTOR & DESIGN TEAM REMOVED THESE |
| | ITEMS FOR FURTHER UPDATING AND REVIEW!!!! |
| | FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4 |
| | : COMPONENTS & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF |
| | THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING |
| | REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: (NOTE NOT |
| | REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD)PLEASE INDICATE |
| | WHERE EACH OF THE PRODUCTS WILL BE USED, (EXAMPLE, |
| | TRAINER, TCW 250P |
| | ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL SYSTEM W/ UNREINFORCED MULLIONS |
| | SMUVS. TRAINER TCW250P ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL SYSTEM W/ |
| | UNREINFORCED MULLIONS LMU, |
| | ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL) IT APPEARS THAT THESE UNITS WILL |
| | BE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING SPANING BETWEEN THE |
| | 2ND & 3RD FLOOR. THERE ARE NO WINDOW OR DOOR SCHEDULES |
| | IN THIS PLAN, STRUCTURAL ELEVATION SHEET S0-3.0 |
| | INDICATES NOT TO SCALE!!! |
| | WITH THE IMPORTANCE FACTORS ON THIS BUILDING THE |
| | PRESSURES ARE GREATER THAN USUAL, PLEASE HIGHLIGHT |
| | WHICH UNIT WILL BE USED WHEN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS |
| | MORE THAN ONE IN THE NOA. ALSO WITH THE WINDOW UNITS |
| | LISTED ABOVE ARE GOING TO BREAK AT THE |
| | 30?-0? LINE LARGE MISSILE / SMALL MISSILEBREAK LINE, |
| | HOW WILL THE MULLIONS AND OR WINDOW UNITS BREAK? |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | A) FIXED WINDOWS |
| | B) OPERABLE WINDOWS |
| | C) MULLIONS NOT COVERED BY NOA |
| | D) GLAZED DOORS, AUTOMATIC SLIDERS, SWING DOORS OR |
| | PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF ACCESS |
| | HATCHES |
| | E) EXTERIOR METAL DOORS IF SINGLE OR PAIRS |
| | F) ROLL-UP OR SECTIONAL DOORS |
| | G) LOUVERS- WALL |
| | H) PANEL WALLS: SOFFITS, EFIS, STOREFRONTS, CURTAIN |
| | WALLS |
| | I) SKYLIGHTS |
| | J)PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS |
| | K) ROOFING PRODUCTS: BUILT UP, MODIFIED, SINGLE PLY |
| | SYSTEMS, METAL ROOFING |
| | SPRAY APPLIED POLYURETHANE, ROOF SYSTEM |
| | FASTENERS, UNDERLAYMENTS AND |
| | WATERPROOFING ,********** NO ROOFING PRODUCTS |
| | SUBMITTED AT ALL!!!!!!************* |
| | L) ACCESS ROOF HATCHES: SINCE THERE IS NO PRODUCTS THAT |
| | ARE CURRENTLY LISTED WITH EITHER THE STATE WEB SITE OR |
| | MIAMI-DADE THIS PRODUCT WILL REQUIRE LOCAL APPROVAL |
| | FORMS WILL BE ATTACHED. |
| | |
| | 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. |
| | IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT |
| | RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 |
| | M) IN BUILDINGS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE |
| | BALANCE OF GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING |
| | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT |
| | RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR |
| | PROTECTED WITH AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, |
| | OR MIAMI-DADE TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN |
| | AS FOLLOWS: 1.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 |
| | FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED |
| | MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE TEST. |
| | |
| | 79) 2ND REQUEST, W P B ADMINISTRTIVE CODE 106.3.3* |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED |
| | BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 80) SAME REQUEST AS 79. W.P.B. ADMIN CODE 106.3* |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 81) 1714.5.3 EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES. |
| | EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES NOT COVERED BY SECTION |
| | 1715.4.2 OR SECTION 1714.5.3.1 SHALL BE TESTED FOR |
| | STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 330 |
| | PROCEDURE A, AT A LOAD OF 1.5 TIMES THE REQUIRED DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE LOAD. THE LOAD SHALL BE SUSTAINED FOR 10 |
| | SECONDS WITH NO PERMANENT DEFORMATION OF ANY MAIN FRAME |
| | OR PANEL MEMBER IN EXCESS OF 0.4 PERCENT OF ITS SPAN |
| | AFTER THE LOAD IS REMOVED. HIGH-VELOCITY HURRICANE |
| | ZONES SHALL COMPLY WITH TAS 202. AFTER EACH SPECIFIED |
| | LOADING, THERE SHALL BE NO GLASS BREAKAGE, PERMANENT |
| | DAMAGE TO FASTENERS, HARDWARE PARTS, OR ANY OTHER |
| | DAMAGE WHICH CAUSES THE DOOR TO BE INOPERABLE. |
| | |
| | 82) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 83) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 84)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, |
| | IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE |
| | ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | WEST PALM BEACH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT WEST |
| | PALM BEACH, FL 33402 |
| | TEL (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX (561)805-6731 |
| | |
| | |
