| Date |
Text |
| 2007-02-06 10:25:16 | ******* UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ****** |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ITEMS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED ALONG WITH NEW |
| | COMMENTS BASED ON CHANGES IN PLANS AND NEW INFORMATION |
| | AND/OR CHANGES MADE TO PLANS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THAT AT THIS TIME DUE TO THE COMPLETELY |
| | REVISED RISER AND CHANGES, A COMPLETE REVIEW FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE CAN NOT BE DONE AS THERE ARE MANY ITEMS NOT |
| | SUBMITTED ON RISER ETC. |
| | |
| | **** IMPORTANT**** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM |
| | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A *NO*, *OK* OR *NO/OK*. |
| | |
| | A) A, NO WILL CONTAIN A FURTHER EXPLANATION AS TO WHY |
| | THE COMMENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED WITH THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE BELOW WITH **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE |
| | #1** |
| | |
| | B) A, OK, WILL HAVE NO COMMENTS EXCEPT PERHAPS A |
| | REFERENCE TO SEE ** NEW NOTES*. THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | NOTE WILL BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | C) A, NO/OK, WILL HAVE FURTHER EXPLANATION AS PART OF |
| | THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL. |
| | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE WILL BE NOTED **PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW NOTE #1** |
| | |
| | D) NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END AND LABELED ** |
| | NEW NOTES ** |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | *** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES *** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE YEAR OF THE CODES IS NOT |
| | STATED ON PLANS. PLEASE KNOW THIS IS OF THE UTMOST |
| | IMPORTANCE AS THE 2005 NFPA-70 HAS BEEN ADOPTED AND |
| | THERE ARE SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCES. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE BE SURE PLANS REFLECT THE FOLLOWING CODES AT A |
| | MINIMUM. |
| | 2002 NFPA-70 (NEC. |
| | 2002 NFPA-72 FAC. |
| | |
| | ** THE LATEST CODE IS NOTE YET ADOPTED BY THE STATE. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER SEE NOT FOR CIRCUITING. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE RISER DIAGRAM HAS NOW BEEN |
| | COMPLETELY REVISED REMOVING MAIN WITH ANY OVER CURRENT |
| | PROTECTION DEVICES FOR SUB PANELS OR OTHER EQUIPMENT |
| | WHICH IS FED. PLEASE SEE THE RISER NOW SEEMS TO ONLY |
| | SHOW A METER TO SOME SORT OF GUTTER WITH NO MAINS ON |
| | THE RISER, OR ANY EQUIPMENT? PLEASE SEE 240.21 IF THE |
| | ATTEMPT IS TRYING TO USE SOME SORT OF TAP CONDUCTOR |
| | RULE. PLEASE SEE THAT ALL MAINS ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | GROUPED, ALL TAPS SHALL TERMINATE IN OVER CURRENT |
| | PROTECTION ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE PANELS ARE SHOWN AS MLO (MAIN LUG ONLY) |
| | WITHOUT ANY MAINS. |
| | PLEASE SEE 230.70, 230.71, 230.72, 230.76, 230.79 ETC |
| | FOR REQUIRED MAINS ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE THERE IS EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS |
| | BEING SHOWN FROM THIS GUTTER OF SORTS TO THE MLO PANELS |
| | AND EQUIPMENT, WHICH IS OK AS LONG AS THERE ARE MAINS |
| | AHEAD OF THIS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS RISER WAS COMPLETELY |
| | DIFFERENT. |
| | PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION OF SERVICE ON PLANS AND |
| | IDENTIFY ALL PANELS/MAINS AND THEIR LOCATIONS ON |
| | PLANS.110.26, 240.24 ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FEEDERS ON THE RISER DO NOT CORRELATE |
| | WITH THE FEEDERS ON THE PANEL SUBMITTED. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.4 |
| | NEC 2002 PLEASE ALSO SEE OTHER COMMENTS WHICH WILL |
| | AFFECT THE RISER AND PANELS AS SHOWN. |
| | |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND PLANS, AS PLANS CALL FOR |
| | WHAT APPEARS TO BE A NEW METER/MAIN COMBO, YET RISER |
| | SHOWS NO MAIN? PLEASE INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE NEW |
| | MCB. |
| | 230.70, 240.4, 310.15B6, 310.16, 230.71, ETC |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: OK, NOTE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE AS THE NOTE #3 STATES THAT |
| | THERE ARE NOT MAINS ETC, THE RATING CAN NOT BE |
| | VERIFIED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT IS BEING STATED |
| | AND SHOWN FROM FPL AND THE MLO PANELS ARE SHOWING A 22K |
| | RATING FOR ALL BRANCH BREAKERS. SINCE THE MAINS ARE NOT |
| | SHOWN AT THIS TIME, THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | ** PLEASE ALSO VERIFY THE INDICATION OF THE BRANCH |
| | BREAKERS BEING SHOWN AT 22K RATING AS THIS IS NOT |
| | COMMON AND WOULD BE EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE. HAVING THE |
| | BRANCH BREAKERS RATED AT 22K IS PERMITTED. |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE COMMENT FOR NEW MAINS ONCE RISER IS |
| | REVISED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE AIC RATINGS FOR NEW SERVICE EQUIPMENT |
| | ALONG WITH SELECTIVE COORDINATION WHICH IS TO BE DONE. |
| | 110.9, 240.12 |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE RISER WAS REVISED AND NOW |
| | SHOWS A NEW PANEL AND AN EXISTING PANEL, HOWEVER THE |
| | COMPETITION OF CIRCUITS ON PLANS AND COORDINATION WITH |
| | THE NEW PANEL SUBMITTED AHS NOT YET BEEN DONE. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS COMMENT WAS TO SUBMIT A PANEL |
| | SCHEDULE WHICH WAS NOT SUBMITTED, NOW THAT ONE IS |
| | SUBMITTED, THERE ARE ITEMS WHICH DO NOT CORRELATE WITH |
| | LOAD CALCULATIONS AND PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME ITEMS ON PLANS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN THE |
| | CIRCUITING FOR WHAT THE EQUIPMENT IS. (OVEN, SA'S, |
| | FRIG, MICROWAVE ETC) ARE NOT CIRCUITED, EVEN THOUGH THE |
| | OVEN IS SHOWN IN LOAD CALCULATIONS? |
| | ** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW AND NEW FOR |
| | ITEMS ON PANEL SCHEDULE AND LOAD CALCULATIONS WHICH DO |
| | NOT MATCH. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT A PANEL SCHEDULE(S) INDICATING ALL |
| | MINIMUM REQUIRED CIRCUITS FOR ALL NEW AND INDICATE |
| | EXISTING. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE PANEL SCHEDULE(S)SHOW ALL OCP DEVICES |
| | AND CONDUCTOR SIZES AS REQUIRED FOR MIN CIRCUITS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW WE ARE UNABLE TO REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | AT THIS TIME. |
| | 240.4,310.16, 424.3B, 210.52, ETC. |
| | FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.4(8). |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE:OK, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE A CIRCUIT ON PANEL |
| | SCHEDULE WHICH MENTIONS *WP BATH*PLEASE SEE MISSING |
| | DEDICATED BATH(S) CIRCUIT(S) PER 210.52D, 210.11C3 |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE CIRCUIT IS ON PANEL |
| | SCHEDULE HOWEVER THE LOAD IS NOT CORRECT AND THE LOAD |
| | WHICH IS TO BE CORRECTED NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | LOAD CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING DINING AREA/BREAKFAST AREA PER |
| | 210.52B1, 210.11C1, 220.16 |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE A NOTE WAS ADDED ON THE PLANS |
| | AND SOME ELECTRICAL OUTLETS ARE SHOWN WITH AFCI |
| | PROTECTION; HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THAT THE SA'S ARE NOT |
| | CIRCUITED AND NOTE MENTIONS THESE ARE TO BE CIRCUITED |
| | TO THE KITCHEN/BATH LIGHTING CIRCUITS. THIS WOULD THEN |
| | REQUIRE ARC FAULT PROTECTION FOR THESE CIRCUIT(S) |
| | ALSO. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE SEE WE ARE UNDER THE 2002 NEC AND REQUIRES AFCI |
| | PROTECTIONS FOR ALL "OUTLETS" IN BEDRM/SLEEPING AREAS. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THIS IS REQUIRED OF NEW SMOKE ALARMS, |
| | FANS, LTS, RECEPTS ETC. |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER PLEASE KNOW AT THIS TIME DUE TO |
| | THE REVISIONS AND CHANGES IN RISER WHICH WILL BE |
| | FORTH-COMING THIS NOTE WILL REMAIN. |
| | |
| | **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR PER |
| | 250.6, 250.24B, 250.110, 250.122 |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE: NO/OK, PLEASE SEE NEW GROUNDING DETAIL |
| | MENTIONS FOOTER STEEL WHERE AVAILABLE. PLEASE KNOW THIS |
| | IS REQUIRED. 250.50 |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE NOTE AND VERIFY THE EXISTING/NEW GROUNDING |
| | ELECTRODE SYSTEM FOR THE NEW SERVICE. 250.50, CWP (IF |
| | METAL) |
| | PLEASE SEE 250.66, 310.15B16 FOR MIN SIZE SHALL BE |
| | 1/0. |
| | |
| | 14) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE HEAT FOR THE AHU HAS NOW |
| | BEEN COMPLETELY REVISED TO WHAT IS BEING SHOWN AS |
| | 12.5KW. PLEASE VERIFY THIS. IF THIS IS INDEED THE CASE, |
| | PLEASE SEE THE SAME CODE SECTION AS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN |
| | FOR THE MINIMUM OVER CIURRENT PROTECTION TO BE SIZED AT |
| | 125% PER 424.3B. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1 ** |
| | PLEASE VERIFY THE SIZE OF THE HEAT STRIPS AS SHOWN. |
| | 5KW SEEMS LOW FOR THIS SIZE ADDITION. PLEASE KNOW THAT |
| | THIS IS ONLY A NOTE GIVEN. IF THIS CHANGES AND AS PANEL |
| | SCHEDULES ARE REQUIRED, PLEASE SEE 424.3B FOR MIN OCP. |
| | |
| | |
| | 15) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 16) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 16) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 17) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 18) NOTE: OK, FOR THIS COMMENT, HOWEVER SEE #6 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 19) NOTE: NO, AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED AND THE NOTE # 3 |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE INDICATE THE NEW SERVICE LOCATION ON PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE 240.24, 230.70 ETC. |
| | |
| | 20) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 21) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THAT THE ENTIRE PACKAGE OF |
| | TRUSS PLANS AND LAYOUTS ARE THE SAME AS PREVIOUSLY |
| | SUBMITTED. PLEASE KNOW THAT THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR |
| | NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY THE OTHER TRADE(S). |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT ONE SET WILL BE RETAINED ALONG WITH |
| | OTHER RETAINED PLANS. PLEASE CONTACT THE FLORIDA BOARD |
| | OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON |
| | THIS MATTER. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW NOTES, AS THE TRUSS |
| | ENGINEERING PLANS CONTAIN A RAISED SEAL OVER A "RUBBER |
| | STAMPED" SIGNATURE WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER FAC |
| | 61G15-23.002, FS 471.025 |
| | |
| | 22) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 23) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 24) NOTE:NO, SAME COMMENT, PLEASE SEE THE SECTION |
| | GIVEN PREVIOUSLY AS THE AMOUNT OF THE RECESSED LIGHTING |
| | SHALL BE FIGURED INTO THE CALCULATIONS IN ADDITION TO |
| | THE LOAD CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1 ** |
| | PLEASE SEE 220.3B4. |
| | PLEASE SHOW ALL RECESSED LTS BASED ON MAX WATTAGE FOR |
| | FIXTURE(S). THIS MAY NOTBE FIGURED IN W/ 3W/PER SQ |
| | FT. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE FIXTURE INFORMATION ON LEGEND. |
| | |
| | 25) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THIS COMMENT REMAINS THE SAME |
| | AS THE LOAD ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE WHICH IS NOW |
| | SUBMITTED STILL EXCEEDS THAT FOR A SMALL APPLIANCE |
| | CIRCUIT. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LOAD CALCULATIONS STILL INDICATE A LOAD |
| | OF 2500 VA??? |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE SEE SMALL APPL CIRCUITS ARE SHOWN AT 2500VA |
| | WHICH FAR EXCEEDS THE RATING OF A 20A CIRCUIT AND #12 |
| | AWG. |
| | 240.4,310.16, 220, ETC |
| | |
| | ***** NEW NOTES *** |
| | |
| | 26) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS ON LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS WHICH DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE LOADS ON |
| | THE PANEL SCHEDULE SUBMITTED. |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE ALL. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE 408.4 AS THE PANEL SCHEDULE WHICH IS |
| | NOW SUBMITTED SHALL CONTAIN MORE DETAIL FOR THE |
| | CIRCUITS BEING SHOWN. PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING |
| | COMMENTARY WHICH IS BEING EXTRACTED DIRECTLY FROM THE |
| | CODE. |
| | PANEL SCHEDULES ARE *TO REQUIRE THAT THE IDENTIFICATION |
| | FOR EVERY CIRCUIT SUPPLIED BY A PANEL-BOARD OR |
| | SWITCHBOARD BE LEGIBLE AND CLEARLY STATE THE SPECIFIC |
| | PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE CIRCUIT IS USED. CIRCUITS USED |
| | FOR THE SAME PURPOSE MUST BE IDENTIFIED AS TO THEIR |
| | LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, SMALL APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS |
| | CAN SUPPLY OUTLETS IN THE KITCHEN, DINING ROOM, AND |
| | KITCHEN COUNTERTOPS. IDENTIFYING THE CIRCUITS AS SMALL |
| | APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE; INSTEAD, |
| | THEY SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AS "KITCHEN WALL |
| | RECEPTACLES,'' DINING ROOM FLOOR RECEPTACLE,'' OR |
| | "KITCHEN COUNTERTOP RECEPTACLES LEFT OF SINK.'' CIRCUIT |
| | DIRECTORIES CONTAINING MULTIPLE ENTRIES WITH ONLY |
| | "LIGHTS'' OR "OUTLETS'' DO NOT PROVIDE THE SUFFICIENT |
| | DETAIL REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION.* |
| | |
| | 27) NOTE: PLEASE SEE OTHER SHEETS INDICATE A |
| | RECIRCULATION PUMP FOR HOT WATER HOWEVER THE ELECTRICAL |
| | PLANS DO NOT SEEM TO INDICATE OR SHOW THIS. |
| | PLEASE COMPLETE AND CORRELATE WITH OTHER SHEETS FOR |
| | EQUIPMENT. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.4 ADMIN SECTION. |
| | 310.16, 240.4, ETC (NEC) |
| | |
| | 28) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COPY OF FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW AS THERE ARE MANY ITEMS NOT SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REVIEW, THERE MAY BE FUTURE COMMENTS ON NEXT |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
