| Date |
Text |
| 2006-12-27 08:08:23 | ***** UNSAT2ND REVIEW **** |
| | |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL |
| | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH SOME NEW COMMENTS, |
| | SOME BASED ON PLANS NOW SUBMITTED, NEW DOCUMENTS BEING |
| | REVIEWED FOR THE FIRST TIME AND SOME NEW COMMENTS NOT |
| | MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A NO, OK OR A NO/OK. |
| | THESE WILL BE FOR THE EXACT NUMERICAL NOTATION OF THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES. |
| | |
| | A NO IS IF THE COMMENT WAS NOT FULLY ADDRESSED AND/OR |
| | FURTHER EXPLANATION OR CHANGES IN PLANS OR DOCUMENTS |
| | ARE STILL NEEDED. THIS REVIEWER WILL TRY TO BETTER |
| | EXPLAIN NOTE ABOVE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT. |
| | |
| | AN OK WILL BE LABELED AS SUCH ON THE SAME NUMERICAL |
| | COMMENT AND WILL HAVE OLD NOTE REMOVED FROM COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | A NO/OK MEANS PART OF THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE ANY NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END OF |
| | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AND NOTED AS SUCH. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THIS IS THE SAME NOTE. PLEASE |
| | SEE THERE ARE STILL CODES ON ELECTRICAL PLANS WHICH ARE |
| | FROM THE 1996 NEC. (NOTE #37) |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE BE SURE PLANS REFLECT THE FOLLOWING CODES AT A |
| | MINIMUM. |
| | 2002 NFPA-70 (NEC. |
| | 2002 NFPA-72 FAC. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: OK/NO, SYMBOL WAS CHANGED; HOWEVER PLEASE SEE |
| | THAT THE NOTE ON E-2 STILL INDICATES SMOKE DETECTORS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE NFPA-72 DEFINITIONS, THE SYMBOL FOR SMOKE |
| | DETECTION DEVICES SHOULD BE SA IF INDEED A DEVICE WHICH |
| | WILL BE INSTALLED TO DETECT AND SOUND. IF THERE IS A |
| | FIRE ALARM SYSTEM, THEN ONLY THEN WOULD THEY BE SD. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: NO/OK, PLEASE SEE NOTES ON PLANS ON E-2 WHICH |
| | ARE LABELED AS KEYNOTES STILL ARE IN QUESTION. PLEASE |
| | SEE MISSING #6. PLEASE ACTUALLY SHOW THE EQUIPMENT AND |
| | LOCATIONS ON PLANS. COMPLIANCE FOR SOME CODE REVIEW |
| | ITEMS CAN NOT BE DONE. |
| | PLEASE SEE MANY OF THE PREVIOUS ITEMS FROM THIS COMMENT |
| | WAS ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL. |
| | |
| | |
| | **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND PLANS, AS PLANS CALL FOR A |
| | NEW METER/MAIN COMBO, YET RISER SHOWS AND MAIN AND A |
| | NEW PANEL?? |
| | PLEASE SEE RISER SHOWS THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE |
| | CONDUCTORS FROM THE METER TO THE MAIN AS "FEEDERS". |
| | PLEASE KNOW, THESE ARE INDEED SERVICE ENTRANCE |
| | CONDUCTORS TO THE MAIN. PLEASE KNOW FEEDERS ARE ONLY |
| | AFTER THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT. |
| | PLEASE SEE IN EITHER CASE THE CONDUCTOR SIZES ARE |
| | MISSING FOR THE SEC'S AND THE FEEDERS FROM THE MAIN TO |
| | PANELS? |
| | PLEASE SEE 240.4, 310.16, 100, 215.5, 230.7 ETC |
| | NO REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE OF THESE CAN BE DONE AT THIS |
| | TIME. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: OK/NO, PLEASE SEE NOTE #10 COMMENTS WITH |
| | RESPECT TO CORRELATION OF OVER CURRENT PROTECTION, |
| | CONDUCTOR SIZES AND SIZE OF LOADS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE INDICATE ALL PANEL AND EQUIPMENT SIZE AND |
| | CORRELATE WITH CONDUCTORS AND OCP. |
| | 240., 230.310 ETC. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: OK/NO, PLEASE SEE THE PANEL SCHEDULE WAS |
| | SUBMITTED, HOWEVER THERE ARE ITEMS WHICH DO NO MEET |
| | MINIMUM CODE FOR OCP, CONDUCTORS SIZES ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE COMMENTS ON THESE NOTES AND REDLINED PLANS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT A PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATING ALL MINIMUM |
| | REQUIRED CIRCUITS FOR ALL NEW AND INDICATE EXISTING. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS ALL OCP DEVICES AND |
| | CONDUCTOR SIZES AS REQUIRED FOR MIN CIRCUITS. PLEASE |
| | KNOW WE ARE UNABLE TO REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AT |
| | THIS TIME. |
| | 240.4,310.16, 424.3B, 210.52, ETC. |
| | FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.3.5.4(8). |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE 220.31B FOR MINIMUM LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS, THIS MAY ACTUALLY AFFECT THE SERVICE AND |
| | SIZE. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE COMPLETE PANEL SCHEDULE AND CORRELATE LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR ALL DEDICATED ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS ON |
| | PLANS. PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL DEDICATED CIRCUITS |
| | WHICH ARE NOT FIGURED INTO THE LOAD CALCS. FRIG, GDO, |
| | OTHERS SHOWN ETC. |
| | 220.31B, 220.16, 210.11 |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE CIRCUIT(S) SHOWN; HOWEVER |
| | PLEASE SEE THESE CAN NOT BE #14 OR 15A OCP. |
| | PLEASE SEE MASTER BATH RECEPTS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING DEDICATED BATH(S) CIRCUIT(S) PER |
| | 210.52D, 210.11C3 |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE:NO, COULD NOT LOCATE ANY INDICATION OF THIS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING DINING AREA/BREAKFAST AREA PER |
| | 210.52B1, 210.11C1, 220.16 |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE OCP AND CONDUCTOR SIZES |
| | FOR THE EACH OF THE CIRCUITS DO NOT MEET CODE. PLEASE |
| | SEE PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS 50A OCP AND #6 AND EACH |
| | APPLIANCE CIRCUIT AS 240V? |
| | PLEASE ADJUST AND CORRELATE. |
| | |
| | |
| | **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE DISPOSAL IS BEING SHOWN WITH 2KW LOAD. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THIS UNIT IS MOST LIKELY A 120V UNIT AND |
| | 2KW EXCEEDS THE RATING OF A 20A CIRCUIT. PLEASE KNOW AS |
| | NO PANEL SCHEDULE WAS NOT SUBMITTED, IT IS UNCLEAR OF |
| | THE OCP AND THE SIZE OF THE CONDUCTORS INTENDED. 240.4, |
| | 310.16, ETC |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE:OK. |
| | |
| | 14) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 15) NOTE:NO, PLEASE CLARIFY THE EXISTING AREAS AND |
| | NEW, AND MUCH IF THE EXISTING DWELLING IS BEING |
| | REMODELED AND CODE COMPLIANCE FOR RECEPT SPACING NEEDS |
| | TO BE VERIFIED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SOME AREAS WHICH APPEAR TO CONTAIN |
| | NEW WALLS, YET DO NOT MEET 210.52 FOR RECEPT SPACING. |
| | PLEASE INDICATED ALL NEW AND EXISTING (E) WHICH WILL OR |
| | DO MEET ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 16) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 17) NOTE:OK/NO, PLEASE SEE A/C UNITS AS NOW SHOWN, |
| | HOWEVER PLEASE SEE MISSING DISCONNECTS FOR THE AHU?S |
| | WHICH SHOWS A RECEPT FOR UNIT. PLEASE SEE 440.11, |
| | 440.12 AS RECEPTS ARE NOT PERMITTED FOR THE CONNECTION |
| | OF THESE UNITS AND TO USE AS DISCONNECT EITHER. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE NEW NOTES WITH RESPECT TO CU?S. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE ANY NEW A/C EQUIPMENT AND DISCONNECTS |
| | IF APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | 18) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE THE WASHER AND DRYER WAS |
| | IDENTIFIED, HOWEVER THERE ARE STILL TWO OTHER LOCATION |
| | WHICH APPEARS TO BE EQUIPMENT OF SOME KIND.PLEASE SEE |
| | PANEL SCHEDULE MENTIONS A WATER HEATER AND ELECTRIC FOR |
| | THIS UNIT, HOWEVER THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON PLANS. PLEASE |
| | SEE REDLINED SET. |
| | |
| | **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE NEW EQUIPMENT WHICH SEEMS TO BE SHOWN IN |
| | GARAGE BUT NOT IDENTIFIED? |
| | WASHER/ DRYER? |
| | |
| | **** NEW NOTES*** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING GFI RECEPTS PER 210.63 , |
| | 210.8A3. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH CONTAIN A |
| | NOTE IN ASTERISK ** WHICH SAID ** IMPORTANT**, WHICH |
| | REQUESTED FOR ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS TO BE COMPLETELY |
| | REMOVED FROM SETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW SHEETS INTO THE |
| | TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW. PLEASE KNOW THIS WILL |
| | HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS TO EXPEDITE PLANS IN THE |
| | REVIEW AND PROCESSING. IF THESE ARE NOT REMOVED, THE |
| | CONTRACTOR WILL BE CONTACTED TO COME IN AND DO THIS |
| | BEFORE PLANS CAN BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE. |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED NOTICE TO FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2006-12-26 16:38:04 | 2006-12-26 18:07:32 |
| | NOTES TO FOLLOW, REVIEW STOPPED. |
