| Date |
Text |
| 2007-01-31 09:17:09 | ***FAILED*** |
| | |
| | THE COMMENTS BELOW WERE EITHER NOT ADDRESSED UPON |
| | RESUBMITTAL, OR RESULT FROM MODIFICATIONS THAT WERE |
| | MADE TO THE ORIGINAL PLANS. |
| | |
| | 1) AS THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLANS HAVE CHANGED |
| | SINCE APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 270-06, A MINOR DSI |
| | AMENDMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO, AND APPROVED BY, THE |
| | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT.PLEASE CONTACT ME FOR |
| | MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THIS MATTER. |
| | |
| | 2) THE SIGNS SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION AND WILL BE REVIEWED AT THAT TIME. |
| | |
| | 3) AS A FOLLOW-UP TO PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS, HAS THERE |
| | BEEN ANY FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF INSTALLING A PAVER |
| | ENTRANCEWAY? |
| | |
| | 4) MANY OF YOUR NOTES ARE REFERENCING DETAILS USING THE |
| | INCORRECT SHEET #.VERIFY ALL OF YOUR REFERENCES AND |
| | ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 5) PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THE GATE ON THE PARKING LOT TO |
| | THE NORTH OF THE EXISTING ALUMINUM BUILDING WILL |
| | FUNCTION.IT APPEARS THAT IF IT SLIDES OPEN TO THE |
| | SOUTH, IT WILL IMPEDE WITH THE ADJACENT PARKING AND |
| | SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 6) ARE YOU NO LONGER PROPOSING A GATE ACROSS THE |
| | DRIVEWAY, ISOLATING THE STUDENT PARKING ENTRANCE/EXIT |
| | FROM THE GUEST PARKING AND PARENT DROP-OFF/PICK-UP? |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY AS THIS GATE IS STILL SHOWN ON THE CIVIL |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | 7) THE GATE AT THE NORTH END OF THE PARENT |
| | DROP-OFF/PICK-UP LOOP WILL INTERFERE WITH THE PARKING |
| | DRIVE ISLE TO THE SOUTH IF SLID OPEN TO THE |
| | SOUTH...HOWEVER, THE DETAIL SHOWS IT SLIDING IN BOTH |
| | DIRECTIONS FROM THE MIDDLE. |
| | |
| | 8) THE GATE A SPENCER DRIVE AND THE SOUTHERN ROADWAY |
| | INTO THE PROPERTY SHALL NOT CROSS THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | THE ARROW INDICATES THAT IT WILL BE OPENING FULLY TO |
| | THE SOUTH...HOWEVER, THE DETAIL SHOWS IT SLIDING IN |
| | BOTH DIRECTIONS FROM THE MIDDLE.WHICH PERMIT WILL |
| | THIS WORK BE DONE UNDER?IT IS NOT INDICATED WITH |
| | EITHER PHASE I, NOR PHASE II. |
| | |
| | VERIFY THE CLEARANCE TO OPEN ALL GATES AND ADJUST THE |
| | SLIDE ARROWS ON THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 9) IN REGARD TO THE PARKING LOT OT THE SOUTH OF THE |
| | EXISTING 2-STORY ALUMINUM BUILDING...SHEET A-5 LABELS |
| | THIS AS NEW ASPHALT, BUT IT IS NOT HATCHED AS SUCH. |
| | |
| | 10) ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND LANDSCAPE PLANS, THE |
| | STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN AT THE EXIT TO SPENCER DRIVE |
| | SHALL BE MOVED BEHIND THE EXISTING SIDEWALK.THE CIVIL |
| | PLANS SHOW THIS CORRECTLY. |
| | |
| | 11) THE CIVIL PLANS AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOW AN |
| | EXISTING CHAIN-LINK FENCE ALONG SPENCER DRIVE AND |
| | SEQUOIA DRIVE.THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AND IS |
| | NOT ON THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 12) THE PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN SHOWS THE PARENT DROP-OFF |
| | AS TWO-WAY TRAFFIC...THIS IS TO BE 2 LANES GOING |
| | ONE-WAY NORTH.ADJUST PLAN ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 13) THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE NEW, REVISED |
| | SITE PLAN.PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT |
| | AND ACCURATELY REFLECT EACH OTHER. |
| | |
| | PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT FOR THE ADDITION - A |
| | 5-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | WEST END OF THE PARKING ROW LOCATED SOUTH OF THE |
| | ADDITION.THIS HAS BEEN REMOVED SINCE THE ORIGINAL |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR |
| | PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1435. |
