| Date |
Text |
| 2007-05-02 15:17:26 | BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST (PLAN REVIEW ONLY): |
| | |
| | 1- WHEN APPLYING FOR PERMIT WILL NEED: |
| | A) RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE:PROVIDECOMPLETE ADDRESS ON TOP OF FORM AND |
| | LEGAL PAPER NEED TO BE NOTARIZED ALSO. |
| | |
| | B) IMPACT FEES PAID. BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY. BRING BACK STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID |
| | RECEIPT. |
| | |
| | C) PAY PERMIT FEES ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 2- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A) NEED TO USE REVISED FORM 600A-2004R |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP |
| | OF FORM. EG: SPECIFY OWNER AND CONTRACTOR. |
| | |
| | C) REVISE CEILING TYPES INFORMATION ON ITEM #10. |
| | WHERE IS THE SINGLE ASSEMBLY LOCATED AT?. SEE PLANS. |
| | ALSO, REVISE THE UNDERATTIC AREA. SEE PLANS AND SEC. |
| | 13-604.1.A.1 OF 2004 FBC. |
| | |
| | D) COMPLETE BOTTOM OF FORM. NEED PREPARER'S NAME AND |
| | DATE AND OWNER/AGENT NAME AND DATE. |
| | |
| | 3- SURVEY DOESN'T MATCH SITE PLAN AND FLOOR PLANS. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) FIXED WINDOWS. DRAWINGS ARE NOT LEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | B) PRECAST LINTELS: WHY DID ARCHITECT APPROVED NOA |
| | 03-0605.04 IF IT DOESN'T APPLY TO THIS JOB. THIS NOA IS |
| | FOR 4", 6" AND 12" PRECAST LINTELSONLY,WHILE |
| | LINTELS SPECIFIED ON PLANS ARE 8". |
| | |
| | C) ALL SIMPSON AND USP STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS |
| | SPECIFIEDON PLANS AND DETAILS. ONLY PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FOR SIMPSON HETA 16 AND LTA1 WERE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 5- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING (NOT |
| | SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE:TO AVOID DENIALS AND UNNECESSARYDELAYS |
| | PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE STAMPED AND |
| | ALSO MAKE SURE NAME OF ARCHITECT REVIEWING THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS IS CLEARLY IDENTIFIED IN THE REVIEW STAMP. |
| | |
| | 6- ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE THE FIRM'S NUMBER IN THE TITLE |
| | BLOCK AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G1-16.004 OF FLORIDA |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | 7- SOIL TEST REPORT: |
| | A) BOTH COPIES TO HAVE ORIGINAL SEAL, SIGNATURE AND |
| | DATEAND |
| | |
| | B) BOTH COPIES TO HAVE ENGINEERING FIRM CERTIFICATE |
| | OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 61G15-23.002 OF FLORIDAADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | 8- GARAGE DOOR STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL CALLS FOR POURED |
| | CONCRETE COLUMNS. PLANS CALL FOR FILLED CELLS. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 9- SHEET A3: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW ALL |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES WERE CALCULATED. OTHERWISE, REVISE ALL |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES AS REQUIRED BY REVISED TABLE |
| | 1609.6.2.1(2) OF 2004 FBC. |
| | |
| | B) ROOF LOADS DON'T MATCH ROOF LOADS SHOWN ON SHEET |
| | S-2. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: ALSO,NEED TO SPECIFY ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R301 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 |
| | FLORIDA RESIDENTIALCODE. |
| | ALSO, INFORMATION ON SHEET A-3 AND S-2 NEED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | 10- SHEET S-1: |
| | A) SEE SOIL TEST REPORT AND UPDATE ALL GENERAL NOTES |
| | AS REQUIRED. SEE TYPE OF SOIL, ETC. |
| | |
| | B) UPDATE ALL GENERAL NOTES. SEE 2004 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE AND 2004 FBC FOR CORRECT REFERENCE |
| | STANDARD AND CORRECT YEAR TO BE REFERENCED AND REVISE |
| | ALL NOTES AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC.106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | C) DROP AND EDGE FOOTING AT GARAGE AREA IS NOT DRAWN |
| | CORRECTLY.REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 11- SHEET S-2: |
| | A) GABLE END DETAIL. PROVIDE SPECIFIC SPECS FOR TYPE |
| | OF CONNECTOR TO BE INSTALLED.1" STRAP IS NOT ENOUGH |
| | INFORMATION TO PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE ROOF LOADS TO MATCH SHEET A-3. SEE COMMENT |
| | 9(B) ABOVE. |
| | |
| | C) NAILING ZONE PLAN IS MISSING ZONE 3. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | D) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATION'S FOR ROOF |
| | SHEATHING FASTENING. SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 |
| | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR MINIMUM FASTENER SIZE, |
| | TYPE AND SPACING TO BE USED. |
| | |
| | E) CONNECTION SCHEDULE: |
| | * SEE CURRENT SIMPSON AND USP CATALOG AND SPECIFY ALL |
| | LOADS, NUMBER AND TYPE OF FASTENERS. OTHERWISE, PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO JUSTIFY DIFFERENCE ON |
| | SPECSTHAT DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY |
| | THE MANUFACTURER.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | ** WHERE IS SIMPSON HVS26 TAKEN FROM?. UNABLE TO FIND |
| | IN SIMPSON CATALOG. |
| | |
| | F) SIZE OF SOFFIT VENT DOESN'T MATCH SIZE SHOWN ON |
| | TYP. WALL SECTION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | G) SPECIFY TRUSS CONNECTORS AT THE END OF TRUSS |
| | GIRDERS BY THE ENTRY AREA. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | H) SPECIFY TRUSS CONNECTOR FOR TRUSSES THAT ARE |
| | RESTING ON THE DOUBLE PT LEDGER BY ENTRY AREA. DETAIL |
| | PROVIDED IS NOT LEGIBLE. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | |
| | 12- STORM SHUTTERS: |
| | A) CLARIFY WHY ARCHITECT APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED IF THERE ARE NOT DRAWINGS TO REVIEWTO |
| | VERIFY APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE DRAWINGS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE OF |
| | PRODUCT PROPOSED INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | C)INSTALLATION SCHEDULE CAN'TBE REVIEWED UNTIL |
| | DRAWINGS ARE SUBMITTED. BUT,INSTALLATION SCHEDULE |
| | NEEDS TO BE REVISED ANYWAY. EG: OPENING #2 SHOWS 26 |
| | 1/2" X 26" OPENING. THE TOTAL SHUTTER SPAN IS 31" AND |
| | THE MINIMUM EDGE DISTANCE IS 3 1/2".PROPOSED |
| | INSTALLATION DOESN'T WORK. CHECK AND REVISE COMPLETE |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 13- PROVIDE STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL FOR 2X BUCK AS |
| | REQUIRED BY ENTRY DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL. SEE SEC. |
| | R613.6.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER |
| | WAY OF INSTALLING BUCK AND PROVIDE DETAIL AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
