| Date |
Text |
| 2007-01-30 11:14:52 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | 1-8.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 9.)A SEPARATE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE SIGN |
| | SHOWN ON A-0.1.SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED.INFORMATIONAL ONLY; THIS IS NOT |
| | REQUIRED TO BE ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 10.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 11.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 12.)S1 WAS DECLARED, BUT THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN SHOWS |
| | S2.PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 13.)EXTRA FP1 SHEETS WERE SUBMITTED.PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | THREE ORIGINALS, ONE PUT INTO EACH ROLLED PERMIT SET. |
| | |
| | |
| | 14-15.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 16.)A LIFE SAFETY PLAN WAS PROVIDED IN RESPONSE TO |
| | THE PREVIOUS COMMENT.PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING |
| | ITEMS: |
| | |
| | A. THE PURPOSE OF THE OVERLAPPING CIRCLES ON THE PLAN |
| | IS NOT CLEAR, AND NO PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL WAS SHOWN. |
| | TYPICALLY THE WORST CASE TRAVEL DISTANCE IS SHOWN FROM |
| | EACH AREA TO THE REQUIRED EXITS.PLEASE REMOVE THE |
| | CIRCLES AS THEY MAKE THE PLAN DIFFICULT TO READ, OR |
| | CLARIFY THE PURPOSE. |
| | |
| | B. THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN STATES THAT TRAVEL DISTANCE IS |
| | UNLIMITED FOR S2 OCCUPANCY, BUT YOU HAVE DECLARED S1 ON |
| | SHEET A0.0.SEE FBC TABLE 1015.1, S1 HAS A MAXIMUM |
| | TRAVEL DISTANCE OF 250FEET, FULLY SPRINKLED BUILDING. |
| | ALSO SEE OTHER NOTES REGARDING ACCESSIBLE EXITS. |
| | |
| | C. OCCUPANT LOAD OF 63 HAS BEEN DECLARED FOR THE |
| | WAREHOUSE AREA.A0.0 DECLARES 32,720 SF.SEE FBC |
| | TABLE 1004.1.2, FBC 1004.1 STATES THAT OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | CANNOT BE LESS THAN THE TABLE, SO SHOULD BE A MINIMUM |
| | OF 65 BASED ON SF AREA. |
| | |
| | D. FBC1005.1, THE LOSS OF ANY ONE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL |
| | NOT REDUCE THE AVAILABLE CAPACITY TO LESS THAN 50 |
| | PERCENT OF THE REQUIRED CAPACITY.BASED ON DESIGN |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE BUSINESS AREA, THE EXITING DOES |
| | NOT COMPLY.PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | E. THE SCALE APPEARS TO BE 1/16.NOTE THE SCALE ON THE |
| | PLAN.PROVIDE OVERALL DIMENSIONS. |
| | 17.)FBC11-4.1.3(9), ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED IN THE SAME NUMBER AS REQUIRED FOR EXITS BY |
| | LOCAL BUILDING/LIFE SAFETY REGULATIONS. A RAMP IS SHOWN |
| | AT THE BUILDING ENTRANCE, NO OTHER ACCESSIBLE EXITS |
| | SHOWN. |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT ALL EXITS ARE |
| | ACCESSIBLE.SEE FBC11-3, DEFINITION OF EGRESS, MEANS |
| | OF; DOES NOT INCLUDE STAIRS, STEPS, OR ESCALATORS. |
| | |
| | 18.)THIS BUILDING REQUIRES MORE THAN ONE EXIT, SEE |
| | FBC1018.2.THIS WAS NOT ADDRESSED FOR ACCESSIBLE |
| | EXITS; ONLY ONE SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 19.)A1.0 SHOWS A CHECK WRITING STAND, PLEASE NOTE ON |
| | THE PLAN THAT THIS AREA IS NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. |
| | |
| | 20-21.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 22.)FBC11-4.1.3(8)(A)(II), ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES |
| | REQUIRED AT LEAST EQUIVALENT TO THE NUMBER OF |
| | ACCESSIBLE EXITS.SEE OTHER COMMENTS.ENTRANCES WITH |
| | STAIRS DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF VERTICAL |
| | ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | |
| | 23.)EXIT OR EXIT ACCESS DOORWAY ARRANGEMENT SHALL |
| | COMPLY WITH FBC1014.2 OR FBC1014.2.2., SHOW DISTANCE |
| | APART, SEE EXCEPTION 2.THERE ARE TO BE TWO ACCESSIBLE |
| | EXITS WHICH ARE REMOTELY LOCATED.ONLY ONE SHOWN ON |
| | THE PLAN (ALL OTHERS HAVE STAIRS). |
| | |
| | 24.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 25.)SIGN THE OWNER/AGENT LINE OF THE ENERGY CALC. |
| | |
| | 26.)THE COMMENT REGARDING REMOVABLE SHUTTERS WAS, I |
| | BELIEVE, ADDRESSED WITH SUBMITTAL OF IMPACT DOOR |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS.IT APPEARS THAT IMPACT RATED |
| | PRODUCTS WILL BE USED.PLEASE NOTE THAT IF NONIMPACT |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE SUBMITTED ON THIRD REVIEW, A |
| | SHUTTER INSTALLATION PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | PERMIT ISSUANCE.PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU WOULD LIKE |
| | TO PROPOSE THE USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS TO DISCUSS |
| | THAT APPROVAL PROCESS.IF ALL PRODUCTS WILL BE IMPACT |
| | RATED, DISREGARD THE COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 27.)PLEASE NOTE THAT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR IMPACT |
| | DOORS WERE SUBMITTED.PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE |
| | REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3.NO OTHER |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED.NOTE THAT ANY |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED PRIOR TO |
| | PERMIT ISSUANCE WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS WITH |
| | SEPARATE FEES.FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO THE EVALUATION REPORT |
| | (MIAMIDADE NOA IN THIS CASE) PROVIDED, FAC9B72. |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORGIF FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL IS NOT AVAILABLE, PLEASE CONTACT ME TO |
| | DISCUSS. |
| | |
| | NO ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED.THIS MAY |
| | BE DONE WHEN THE ROOF PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR (WITH |
| | SEPARATE FEES BASED ON VALUE), OR MAY BE DONE NOW. |
| | CONTRACTOR OR DOR IS TO SELECT THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | |
| | FOR ALL OTHER PRODUCTS, INCLUDING THE STANDING SEAM |
| | ROOF PANELS, IF THERE ARE DIFFERENT OPTIONS FOR |
| | INSTALLATION AND NOT ALL OF THEM ARE COMPLIANT FOR |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THIS BUILDING, CIRCLE THE |
| | INSTALLATION OR PARTICULAR OPTION YOU ARE USING SO THAT |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE CAN BE DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 28.)SQUARE FOOT AREAS ON THE ENERGY CALCS DO NOT |
| | MATCH THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 29.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 30.)INCLUDE THE CORRECT JURISDICTION ON THE ENERGY |
| | CALCS, 604700 FBC13. |
| | |
| | 31.)THE ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE IS A PHOTOCOPY, ORIGINAL |
| | WET SIGNATURE REQUIRED.SEE PANEL SHEETS AND VP |
| | SHEETS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 32.)A1.2, SPECIFY DESIGN CRITERIA FOR STAIR AND GUARD |
| | RAIL RATHER THAN QUOTING A CODE SECTION.PROVIDE A |
| | DETAIL FOR THE STAIR HANDRAIL, GUARD RAILS, AND RAMP |
| | HANDRAIL.SEE FBC11-4.8.5, FBC11-4.9.4.WHEN SCALED, |
| | STAIR HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS ARE NOT LONG ENOUGH. |
| | |
| | CLARIFY 5-A4.0 HANDRAIL.IT APPEARS ON THE BOTTOM HALF |
| | OF THE RAMP BUT NOT THE TOP HALF. |
| | |
| | 33.)5-A4.0, SHOW THE MINIMUM DIMENSION WHERE THE RAMP |
| | CHANGES DIRECTION.WHEN SCALED IT IS COMPLIANT AT |
| | 60IN, FBC11-4.8.4(3). |
| | |
| | 34.)SOILS REPORTS NOT NECESSARY AS THEY WERE PROVIDED |
| | WITH THE FOUNDATION PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 35.)THE PANEL CALCS STATES THAT THE PROJECT NAME IS |
| | SEA HUNTER BOATS ON SOME PAGES. |
| | |
| | 36.)S2.1, ENGINEER HAS SPECIFIED 69PSF FOR THE FLAT |
| | DECK ROOF, ZONES 2 AND 3.PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 37.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B). |
| | |
| | |
| | TO EXPEDITE PLAN REVIEW, INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING. |