| Date |
Text |
| 2006-12-03 20:12:58 | *** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW**** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW AND NEW |
| | NOTES DUE TO THE PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| | THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | AND INDICATE A "NO OR OK". IF A "NO" IS SHOWN FURTHER |
| | EXPLANATION/NOTES MAY BE PRESENT. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE ANY NEW NOTES ARE BEING ADDED TO THE |
| | BOTTOM OF FIRST REVIEW NOTES. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW A RESPONSE LETTER FROM THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL EXPLAINS HOW EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED OR |
| | A RESPONSE ON THE COMMENT ITSELF IS MOST HELPFUL IN THE |
| | REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER SEE NEW NOTES. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE:NO, IT IS UNCLEAR WHERE THIS DETAIL IS ON |
| | PLANS. DETAIL FOR THE REDUNDANT GROUNDING IS REQUIRED. |
| | WHICH METHOD WILL BE USED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT NEC 517, 517.13 DETAILS IS SHOWN ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE NOTE BELOW RISER DENOTING GROUND BOND PER |
| | NEC MAY NOT USED IN LIEU OF DETAIL REQUIRED. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECT AS ADOPTED BY THE |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE PLANS NOW INDICATE "OC SENSOR" |
| | TYPE DEVICES AT ALL LOCATIONS. PLEASE SEE THAT THE |
| | EMERGENCY LIGHTS AND EXIT LIGHTS SHALL BE SHOWN AHEAD |
| | OF ANY LIGHTING CONTROL DEVICE. PLEASE SEE SOME EXT LTS |
| | DO NOT INDICATE CIRCUITING. PLEASE SEE 700.12E. |
| | PLEASE SEE LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES COULD NOT BE |
| | LOCATED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13, 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND |
| | .1.3. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE LIGHTING CONTROL(S), STATED DEVICES, AND |
| | LOCATIONS OF OVER RIDES AND DEVICES. PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE MAX TIMES ON OVER RIDES. (FYI, TIMER TYPE |
| | 4HRS MAX, OCCUPANT TYPE 30MINS MAX). |
| | PLEASE INDICATE THE MAX LPD(LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES). |
| | PER 13-415.2.ABC.1, TABLES 415. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: NO, SAME NOTE. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| | PLEASE INDICATE ALL ROOM/AREAS DESIGNATIONS ON PLANS |
| | AND CORRELATE PANEL SCHEDULE WHICH IS TO BE SPECIFIC TO |
| | AREAS BEING FED. |
| | 408.4, |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: OK. MEETS EXCEPTION. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: OK? PLEASE SEE RISER SEEMS TO BE OK, HOWEVER A |
| | QUESTION ON THE DESIGNATION OF MULTIPLE BREAKERS IN THE |
| | MDP WHICH MENTIONS DESIGNATIONS TO OTHER PANEL "A'S?? |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY IN RESPONSE/PLANS THE OTHER BREAKERS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE RISER SHOW THE MAIN PANEL IN SPACE AS 400 |
| | MCB. PLEASE SEE THIS APPEARS TO BE A MISPRINT AS THE |
| | SCHEDULE AND SERVICE PROVIDED MENTIONS 300A. |
| | (POSSIBLE, 400MLO/300MCB. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECT. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SHOW, HOW WATTS PER SQ FT, HOW MANY |
| | RECEPTS AND VA PER RECEPT AND HOW THE CONNECTED LOADS |
| | SHOWN ARE BEING DERIVED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE CONNECTED LOADS ARE BEING |
| | DERIVED. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE A LOAD SUMMARY FOR SPACE. PLEASE ALSO |
| | INDICATE ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS AT 125% (3OR MORE HRS). |
| | 220.3,220.10,220.11,220.13,215.3, 230.42 |
| | ETC. |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE MISSING EQUIPMENT GROUNDING |
| | STILL NOT SHOWN FROM PANEL "A" TO "A-1". |
| | PREVIOUS NOTE REQUESTED TO SHOW ALL. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE INDICATE "EQUIPMENT GROUNDING" METHOD FROM MAIN |
| | MDP TO ALL EQUIPMENT. |
| | 250.110, 250.122. |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW, IF USING CONDUIT, THERE MUST BE THE NEW |
| | CONNECTORS WHICH MUST BE LISTED FOR THIS PURPOSE, |
| | OTHERWISE PLEASE INDICATE THE "EQUIPMENT GROUNDING |
| | CONDUCTOR" PER 250.122. |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER VERIFY A 400A MLO PANEL ONLY |
| | BEING 30POLES? THIS DOES NOT NEED TO BE CHANGED ON |
| | PLANS. THIS WILL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD. IF PANEL |
| | INSTALLED, IS INDEED A 42CIRCUIT PANEL, THEN PLANS WILL |
| | BE REQUIRED TO BE REVISED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **PLEASE SEE PANEL "A-1" |
| | INDICATES 30POLES, YET SHOWS 42 CIRCUITS/POLES ARE |
| | SHOWN ON PANEL.. |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE AND ADJUST. |
| | 106.1.2 FBC. |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: OK. SHOWS 65K FOR BRANCH CIRCUIT BREAKER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | *** NEW NOTES FOR SECOND REVIEW*** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE BOTH SETS OF NEW REVISED PLANS |
| | BEING SUBMITTED CONTAIN A "RUBBER-STAMP" FOR THE |
| | REQUIRED ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. PLEASE SEE FLORIDA |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G1-16.003, 004 AND FLORIDA |
| | STATUTES WHICH REQUIRES AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. |
| | (EVIDENCE OF AUTHENTICITY). |
| | PLEASE KNOW, AT THIS TIME ONE SET OF EACH OF THE PLANS |
| | WILL BE RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE, INCLUDING ONE SET OF |
| | ORIGINAL SUBMITTED PLANS WHICH WERE SIGNED WITH AN |
| | ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. |
| | PLEASE KNOW, IF THERE IS ANY VERIFICATION NEEDED FOR |
| | SIGNATURE REQUIRED PLEASE CONTACT THE FLORIDA BOARD OF |
| | ARCHITECT?S LEGAL COUNSEL. MR. LES SMITH INVESTIGATOR |
| | TO THE BOARD OR MR. DAVID MINACCI PROSECUTING |
| | ATTORNEY. |
| | |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
